INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Categoria dell'articolo: Clinical Practice
Pubblicato online: 19 nov 2020
Pagine: 129 - 135
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00162
Parole chiave
© 2020 Greta Mulders et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.


Summary of questionnaire responses
Number of unique nurse responses (from individual centres) | 45 | UK | 10 | |
USA | 9 | |||
Netherlands | 6 | |||
Canada | 5 | |||
New Zealand | 4 | |||
Ireland | 2 | |||
Sweden | 2 | |||
Australia, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Romania, Switzerland | 1 each | |||
Ever switched clotting factor product? | 45 | Yes | 43 | 95% |
No | 2 | 5% | ||
Reason(s) for switch (more than one answer possible) | 33 | Clinical need | 34 | |
Funder/purchaser changed product | 30 | |||
Patient request/preference | 21 | |||
Was switch protocol-based? | 40 | Yes | 20 | 50% |
No | 20 | 50% | ||
If so, who wrote the protocol? | 24 | Haemophilia team | 15 | 62.5% |
Nurse/nurse specialist | 4 | 16.5% | ||
Doctors | 5 | 21% | ||
Frequency of blood tests for pharmacokinetics before switch | 26 | Don’t know | 1 | 4% |
No prior testing | 6 | 23% | ||
Blood testing at least once | 18 | 69% | ||
Depends on product | 1 | 4% | ||
Frequency of blood tests for pharmacokinetics after switch | 25 | None | 4 | 16% |
Depends on product | 4 | 16% | ||
Depends on clinical need | 1 | 4% | ||
No/inappropriate response | 16 | 64% | ||
Screen for inhibitors before switch? | 43 | Yes | 37 | 86% |
No | 6 | 14% | ||
Was patient association involved? | 43 | Yes | 11 | 26% |
No | 27 | 63% | ||
Not sure | 5 | 11% |