This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Franken DR, Acosta AA, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Oehninger S, Hodgen GD: The hemizona assay: Its role in identifying male factor infertility in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 1075–1080.FrankenDRAcostaAAKrugerTFLombardCJOehningerSHodgenGD:The hemizona assay: Its role in identifying male factor infertility in assisted reproduction.Fertil Steril1993;59:1075–1080.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55931-7Search in Google Scholar
Arslan H, Sakarya ME, Atilla MK: Clinical value of power Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of varicocele. J Clin Ultrasound 1998; 26: 229.ArslanHSakaryaMEAtillaMK:Clinical value of power Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of varicocele.J Clin Ultrasound1998;26:229.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199805)26:4<229::AID-JCU13>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar
Masson P, Brannigan RE: The varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 2014; 41: 129–144.MassonPBranniganRE:The varicocele.Urol Clin North Am2014;41:129–144.10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.001Search in Google Scholar
Gorelick JI, Goldstein M: Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 613–616.GorelickJIGoldsteinM:Loss of fertility in men with varicocele.Fertil Steril1993;59:613–616.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55809-9Search in Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Male Reproduction and Urology: Report on varicocele and infertility: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1556–1560.Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Male Reproduction and Urology:Report on varicocele and infertility: A committee opinion.Fertil Steril2014;102:1556–1560.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.007Search in Google Scholar
Lorenc T, Krupniewski L, Palczewski P, Gołębiowski M: The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of varicocele. J Ultrason 2016; 16: 359–370.LorencTKrupniewskiLPalczewskiPGołębiowskiM:The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of varicocele.J Ultrason2016;16:359–370.10.15557/JoU.2016.0036Search in Google Scholar
Belay RE, Huang GO, Shen JK, Ko EY: Diagnosis of clinical and subclinical varicocele: how has it evolved? Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 182–185.BelayREHuangGOShenJKKoEY:Diagnosis of clinical and subclinical varicocele: how has it evolved?Asian J Androl2016;18:182–185.10.4103/1008-682X.169991Search in Google Scholar
Freund J, Handelsman DJ, Bautovich GJ, Conway AJ, Morris JG: Detection of varicocele by radionuclide blood-pool scanning. Radiology 1980; 137: 227–230.FreundJHandelsmanDJBautovichGJConwayAJMorrisJG:Detection of varicocele by radionuclide blood-pool scanning.Radiology1980;137:227–230.10.1148/radiology.137.1.7422850Search in Google Scholar
Paz A, Melloul M: Comparison of radionuclide scrotal blood-pool index versus gonadal venography in the diagnosis of varicocele. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 1069–1074.PazAMelloulM:Comparison of radionuclide scrotal blood-pool index versus gonadal venography in the diagnosis of varicocele.J Nucl Med1998;39:1069–1074.10.1097/00005392-199901000-00129Search in Google Scholar
Kim YS, Kim SK, Cho IC, Min SK: Efficacy of scrotal Doppler ultrasonography with the Valsalva maneuver, standing position, and resting-Valsalva ratio for varicocele diagnosis. Korean J Urol 2015; 56: 144–149.KimYSKimSKChoICMinSK:Efficacy of scrotal Doppler ultrasonography with the Valsalva maneuver, standing position, and resting-Valsalva ratio for varicocele diagnosis.Korean J Urol2015;56:144–149.10.4111/kju.2015.56.2.144Search in Google Scholar
Semiz I, Tokgöz O, Tokgoz H, Voyvoda N, Serifoglu I, Erdem Z: The investigation of correlation between semen analysis parameters and intraparenchymal testicular spectral Doppler indices in patients with clinical varicocele. Ultrasound Q 2014; 30: 33–40.SemizITokgözOTokgozHVoyvodaNSerifogluIErdemZ:The investigation of correlation between semen analysis parameters and intraparenchymal testicular spectral Doppler indices in patients with clinical varicocele.Ultrasound Q2014;30:33–40.10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000055Search in Google Scholar
Gonda RL Jr, Karo JJ, Forte RA, O’Donnell KT: Diagnosis of subclinical varicocele in infertility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 71–75.GondaRLJrKaroJJForteRAO’DonnellKT:Diagnosis of subclinical varicocele in infertility.AJR Am J Roentgenol1987;148:71–75.10.2214/ajr.148.1.71Search in Google Scholar
Aydos K, Baltaci S, Salih M, Anafarta K, Bedük Y, Gülsoy U: Use of color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of varicoceles. Eur Urol 1993; 24: 221–225.AydosKBaltaciSSalihMAnafartaKBedükYGülsoyU:Use of color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of varicoceles.Eur Urol1993;24:221–225.10.1159/000474298Search in Google Scholar
Eskew LA, Watson NE, Wolfman N, Bechtold R, Scharling E, Jarow JP: Ultrasonographic diagnosis of varicoceles. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 693–697.EskewLAWatsonNEWolfmanNBechtoldRScharlingEJarowJP:Ultrasonographic diagnosis of varicoceles.Fertil Steril1993;60:693–697.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56224-4Search in Google Scholar
Mihmanli I, Kurugoglu S, Cantasdemir M, Zulfikar Z, Halit Yilmaz M, Numan F: Color Doppler ultrasound in subclinical varicocele: An attempt to determine new criteria. Eur J Ultrasound 2000; 12: 43–48.MihmanliIKurugogluSCantasdemirMZulfikarZHalit YilmazMNumanF:Color Doppler ultrasound in subclinical varicocele: An attempt to determine new criteria.Eur J Ultrasound2000;12:43–48.10.1016/S0929-8266(00)00102-6Search in Google Scholar
Kim SW: Varicocele and male infertility. J Korean Med Assoc 2012; 55: 37–46.KimSW:Varicocele and male infertility.J Korean Med Assoc2012;55:37–46.10.5124/jkma.2012.55.1.37Search in Google Scholar
Beddy P, Geoghegan T, Browne RF, Torreggiani WC: Testicular varicoceles. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 1248–1255.BeddyPGeogheganTBrowneRFTorreggianiWC:Testicular varicoceles.Clin Radiol2005;60:1248–1255.10.1016/j.crad.2005.06.01016291306Search in Google Scholar
Gat Y, Bachar GN, Zukerman Z, Belenky A, Gorenish M: Physical examination may miss the diagnosis of bilateral varicocele: A comparative study of 4 diagnostic modalities. J Urol 2004; 172: 1414–1417.GatYBacharGNZukermanZBelenkyAGorenishM:Physical examination may miss the diagnosis of bilateral varicocele: A comparative study of 4 diagnostic modalities.J Urol2004;172:1414–1417.10.1097/01.ju.0000138540.57137.5f15371858Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg S: Diagnostic Ultrasound. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 1998.GoldbergS:Diagnostic Ultrasound.Lippincott-Raven,Philadelphia1998.Search in Google Scholar
Trum JW, Gubler FM, Laan R, van der Veen F: The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1232–1235.TrumJWGublerFMLaanRvan der VeenF:The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele.Hum Reprod1996;11:1232–1235.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a0193628671430Search in Google Scholar
Lurvey R, Durbin-Johnson B, Kurzrock EA: Adolescent varicocele: A large multicenter analysis of complications and recurrence in academic programs. J Pediatr Urol 2015; 11: 186.e1–186.e16.LurveyRDurbin-JohnsonBKurzrockEA:Adolescent varicocele: A large multicenter analysis of complications and recurrence in academic programs.J Pediatr Urol2015;11:186.e1–186.e16.10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.05.003499780426071075Search in Google Scholar
Zampieri N, Chironi C, Sulpasso M: Treatment of varicocele with transfemoral retrograde sclero-embolization in pediatric patients under local anesthesia. Minerva Pediatr 2015; 67: 227–229.ZampieriNChironiCSulpassoM:Treatment of varicocele with transfemoral retrograde sclero-embolization in pediatric patients under local anesthesia.Minerva Pediatr2015;67:227–229.Search in Google Scholar
Diamond D: Adolescent versus adult varicoceles – how do evaluation and management differ? J Urol 2009; 181: 2418–2419.DiamondD:Adolescent versus adult varicoceles – how do evaluation and management differ?J Urol2009;181:2418–2419.10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.031Search in Google Scholar
Riccabona M, Oswald J, Koen M, Lusuardi L, Radmayr C, Bartsch G: Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: Sequential comparison of 4 techniques. J Urol 2003; 169: 666–668.RiccabonaMOswaldJKoenMLusuardiLRadmayrCBartschG:Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: Sequential comparison of 4 techniques.J Urol2003;169:666–668.10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63988-2Search in Google Scholar
Kocvara R, Dvorácek J, Sedlácek J, Díte Z, Novák K: Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: A microsurgical repair. J Urol 2005; 173: 1751–1754.KocvaraRDvorácekJSedlácekJDíteZNovákK:Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: A microsurgical repair.J Urol2005;173:1751–1754.10.1097/01.ju.0000154357.72837.43Search in Google Scholar
Hassan JM, Adams MC, Pope JC 4th, Demarco RT, Brock JW 3rd: Hydrocele formation following laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Urol 2006; 175: 1076–1079.HassanJMAdamsMCPopeJC4thDemarcoRTBrockJW3rd:Hydrocele formation following laparoscopic varicocelectomy.J Urol2006;175:1076–1079.10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00402-7Search in Google Scholar
Misseri R, Gershbein AB, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI: The adolescent varicocele. II: The incidence of hydrocele and delayed recurrent varicocele after varicocelectomy in a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2001; 87: 494–498.MisseriRGershbeinABHorowitzMGlassbergKI:The adolescent varicocele. II: The incidence of hydrocele and delayed recurrent varicocele after varicocelectomy in a long-term follow-up.BJU Int2001;87:494–498.10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00110.x11298041Search in Google Scholar
Feber KM, Kass EJ: Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: Long-term experience with the Palomo procedure. J Urol 2008; 180: 1657–1660.FeberKMKassEJ:Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: Long-term experience with the Palomo procedure.J Urol2008;180:1657–1660.10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.09918708215Search in Google Scholar
Schiff J, Kelly C, Goldstein M, Schlegel P, Schelgel P, Poppas D: Managing varicoceles in children: Results with microsurgical varicocelectomy. BJU Int 2005; 95: 399–402.SchiffJKellyCGoldsteinMSchlegelPSchelgelPPoppasD:Managing varicoceles in children: Results with microsurgical varicocelectomy.BJU Int2005;95:399–402.10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05308.x15679802Search in Google Scholar
Wang J, Xia SJ, Liu ZH, Tao L, Ge JF, Xu CM et al.: Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: A meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2015; 17: 74–80.WangJXiaSJLiuZHTaoLGeJFXuCM:Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: A meta-analysis.Asian J Androl2015;17:74–80.10.4103/1008-682X.136443429188225248652Search in Google Scholar
VanderBrink BA, Palmer LS, Gitlin J, Levitt SB, Franco I: Lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus microscopic varicocelectomy: Is there a difference? Urology 2007; 70: 1207–1210.VanderBrinkBAPalmerLSGitlinJLevittSBFrancoI:Lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus microscopic varicocelectomy: Is there a difference?Urology2007;70:1207–1210.10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.03618158049Search in Google Scholar
Cassidy D, Jarvi K, Grober E, Lo K: Varicocele surgery or embolization: Which is better? Can Urol Assoc J 2012; 6: 266–268.CassidyDJarviKGroberELoK:Varicocele surgery or embolization: Which is better?Can Urol Assoc J2012;6:266–268.10.5489/cuaj.295Search in Google Scholar
Bou Nasr E, Binhazzaa M, Almont T, Rischmann P, Soulie M, Huyghe E: Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy vs. percutaneous embolization in infertile men: Prospective comparison of reproductive and functional outcomes. Basic Clin Androl 2017; 27: 11.Bou NasrEBinhazzaaMAlmontTRischmannPSoulieMHuygheE:Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy vs. percutaneous embolization in infertile men: Prospective comparison of reproductive and functional outcomes.Basic Clin Androl2017;27:11.10.1186/s12610-017-0055-x546339428603623Search in Google Scholar