Intrapartumsonography– eccentricity or necessity?

1. Hayachi RH: Ultrasound uses in obstetrics. ClinPerinatol 1983; 10: 253–261.10.1016/S0095-5108(18)31004-2 Search in Google Scholar

2. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH: Intrapartumsonography to determine the fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 12: 172–177.10.1080/jmf.12.3.172.17712530614 Search in Google Scholar

3. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O: Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2002; 19: 258–263.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x11896947 Search in Google Scholar

4. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O: Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2002; 19: 264–268.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x11896948 Search in Google Scholar

5. Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A: Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13: 59–63.10.1080/jmf.13.1.59.6312710859 Search in Google Scholar

6. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M et al.: Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J ObstetGynecol 2005; 192: 868–874.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.02815746684 Search in Google Scholar

7. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH: Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartumsonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2003; 21: 437–440.10.1002/uog.10312768552 Search in Google Scholar

8. Sherer DM, Onyeije CI, Bernstein PS, Kovacs P, Manning FA: Utilization of real-time ultrasound on labor and delivery in an active academic teaching hospital. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16: 303–307.10.1055/s-2007-99387610586984 Search in Google Scholar

9. Chou MR, Kreiser D, Taslimi MM, Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY: Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J ObstetGynecol 2004; 191: 521–524.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.02915343230 Search in Google Scholar

10. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Nicolaides KH: Intrapartumsonography to determine fetal occipital position: interobserver agreement. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2004; 24: 421–424.10.1002/uog.106515343597 Search in Google Scholar

11. Rozenberg P, Porcher R, Salomon LJ, Boirot F, Morin C, Ville Y: Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominalsonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 31: 332–337. Search in Google Scholar

12. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC: A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2009; 33: 313–319.10.1002/uog.632919248000 Search in Google Scholar

13. Dückelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW, Kalache KD: Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’ on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 35: 216–222. Search in Google Scholar

14. Tutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebø TM: Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2013; 41: 425–429.10.1002/uog.1242223371409 Search in Google Scholar

15. Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kämena A, Tutschek B: Intrapartumtranslabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2006; 28: 753–760.10.1002/uog.384817063455 Search in Google Scholar

16. Eggebø TM, Hassan WA, Salvesen KÅ, Lindtjørn E, Lees CC: Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2014; 43: 195–201.10.1002/uog.1321024105705 Search in Google Scholar

17. Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KÅ, Eggebø TM: Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 37: 702–708. Search in Google Scholar

18. Ghi T, Youssef A, Maroni E, Arcangeli T, De Musso F, Bellussi F et al.: Intrapartumtransperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2013; 41: 430–435. Search in Google Scholar

19. Cuerva MJ, Bamberg C, Tobias P, Gil MM, De La Calle M, Bartha JL: Use of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of complicated operative forceps delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2014; 43: 687–692.10.1002/uog.1325624265172 Search in Google Scholar

20. Youssef A, Maroni E, Ragusa A, De Musso F, Salsi G, Iammarino MT et al.: Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2013; 41: 419–424.10.1002/uog.1233523124698 Search in Google Scholar

21. Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, Morselli-Labate AM, Paccapelo A, Mon- taguti E: Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2014; 44: 82–89.10.1002/uog.1332424496823 Search in Google Scholar

22. Eggebø TM, Heien C, Økland I,Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA: Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2008; 32: 199–204.10.1002/uog.536018528923 Search in Google Scholar

23. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G: Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartumtranslabial ultrasound. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2009; 33: 331–336.10.1002/uog.631319202576 Search in Google Scholar

24. Hassan WA, Eggebø TM, Ferguson M, Lees C: Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartumcervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2013; 41: 413–418.10.1002/uog.1231623024020 Search in Google Scholar

25. Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, Kedem A, Katorza E, Moran O et al.: Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2013; 41: 442–446.10.1002/uog.1230423001876 Search in Google Scholar

26. Blasi I, D’Amico R, Fenu V, Volpe A, Fuchs I, Henrich W et al.: Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2010; 35: 210–215.10.1002/uog.750420101635 Search in Google Scholar

27. Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, Kedem A, Katorza E, Moran O et al.: Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2013; 41: 436–441.10.1002/uog.1237823355510 Search in Google Scholar

28. Hassan WA, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D et al.: The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progres of labour by ultrasound. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2014; 43: 189–194. Search in Google Scholar

29. Cunningham F, Leveno KJ, Bloom SI, Hauth JC, Gilstrap JC (eds.): Williams Obstetrics. Vol. 1, McGraw-Hill 2005; 15–38. Search in Google Scholar

30. Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Bamberg C, Dudenhausen JW, Ka- lache KD: Impact of intrapartal ultrasound to assess fetal head position and station on the type of obstetrical interventions at full cervical dilatation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 484–488.10.3109/14767058.2011.58705721726168Search in Google Scholar