[1. Al-Atawi, A. and Saleh, W. (2014) Travel behaviour in Saudi Arabia and the role of social factors. Transport, 29(3), 269-277. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.91319910.3846/16484142.2014.913199]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Beirão, G. and Sarfield Cabral, J. A. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.00910.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Borooah, V. K. (2002) Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412984829]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Brant, R. (1990). Assessing probability in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171-1178. DOI: 10.2307/253245710.2307/2532457]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Cascetta, E. and Cartenì, A. (2014) A quality-based approach to public transportation planning: Theory and a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 84-106. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75853210.1080/15568318.2012.758532]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Celik, E., Aydin, N. and Taskin Gumus, A. (2014) A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transport Policy, 36, 283-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.00510.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Celik, E., Bilisik, O. N., Erdogan, M., Taskin Gumus, A. and Baracli, H. (2013) An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 58, 28-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.06.00610.1016/j.tre.2013.06.006]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Cirillo, C., Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2014) On the asymmetric user perception of transit service quality. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(4), 216-232. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2010.49423110.1080/15568318.2010.494231]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Cirit, F. (2014) Sustainable urban transport policies and comparison of mass transit systems, Planning expertise thesis, General Directorate of Economic sectors and Coordination, Turkish Ministry of Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A. and Cecín, P. (2010) Modelling user perception of bus transit quality. Transport Policy, 17(6), 388-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.00610.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.006]Search in Google Scholar
[11. De Oña, R., Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2014) Key factors affecting rail service quality in the Northern Italy: a decision tree approach. Transport, 29(1), 75-83. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.89821610.3846/16484142.2014.898216]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Diana, M. (2012) Measuring the satisfaction of multimodal travelers for local transit services in different urban context. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.01810.1016/j.tra.2011.09.018]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Dölarslan, E. S. (2014) Assessing the effects of satisfaction and value on customer loyalty behaviors in service environments: High-speed railway in Turkey as a case study. Management Review Research, 37(8), 706-727. DOI: .1108/MRR-06-2013-015210.1108/MRR-06-2013-0152]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2007) Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(3), 21-34. Retrieved from http://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/JPT-10-3-Eboli.pdf10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.2]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2011) A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transport Policy, 18(1), 172-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.00710.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Feng, C. M. and Hsieh, C. H. (2009) Implications of transport diversity for quality of life. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(1), 13-18. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(13)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(13)]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Fu, V. (1998). Estimating generalized ordered logit models. Stata Technical Bulletin, 44, 27-30. Stata technical bulletin reprints, Vol. 8, College Station, Tex.: Stata Press, 160-164. Retrieved from http://stata-press.com/journals/stbcontents/stb44.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Filipović, S., Tica, S., Živanović, P. and Milovanović, B. (2009) Comparative analysis of the basic features of the expected and perceived quality of mass passenger public transport service in Belgrade. Transport, 24(4), 265-273. DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.265-27310.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.265-273]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Garrido, C., de Oña, R. and de Oña, J. (2014) Neural networks for analyzing service quality in public transportation. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(15), 6830-6838. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.04510.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.045]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Grujičić, D., Ivanović, I., Jović, J. and Đorić, V. (2014). Customer perception of service quality in public transport. Transport, 29(3), 285-295. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.95168510.3846/16484142.2014.951685]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Gulhan, G., Ceylan, H., Baskan, O. and Ceylan, H. (2014) Using potential accessibility measure for urban public transportation planning: A case study of Denizli, Turkey. Promet – Traffic & Transportation, 26(2), 129-137. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v26i2.123810.7307/ptt.v26i2.1238]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Fiorio, C. V., Florio, M. and Perucca, G. (2013) User satisfaction and the organization of local public transport: Evidence from European cities. Transport Policy, 29, 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.06.00410.1016/j.tranpol.2013.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Haldenbilen, S. (2003). Evaluation of sustainable transport indicators for Turkey based on genetic algorithm approach, PhD thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Pamukkale University, Denizli (in Turkish).]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Haldenbilen, S. and Ceylan, H. (2005) Transport demand management in Turkey: A genetic algorithm approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 28(6), 403-426. DOI: 10.1080/0308106050051550710.1080/03081060500515507]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, P., Singhal, S. and Sharma, P. (2014) Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 60-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.00710.1016/j.trf.2014.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Kroesen, M. (2014). Modeling the behavioral determinants of travel behavior: An application of latent transition analysis. Transport Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 65, 56-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.01010.1016/j.tra.2014.04.010]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Lai, W. T. and Chen, C. F. (2011) Behavioral intentions of public transit passenger–The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.00310.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Litman, T. (2011) Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, BC, Canada. Available from http://www.vtpi.org/sus_tran_ind.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Litman, T. (2014) Well measured: Developing indicators for sustainable and livable transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, BC, Canada. Available from http://www.vtpi.org/wellmeas.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Long, J. S. and Freese, J. 2001. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. May, A. D. (2013) Urban transport and sustainability: The key challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(3), 170-185. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2013.71013610.1080/15568318.2013.710136]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Mokonyama, M. and Venter, C. (2013) Incorporation of customer satisfaction in public transport contracts – A preliminary analysis. Research in Transportation Economics, 39(1), 58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.02410.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.024]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Pantouvakis, A. and Lymperopoulos, K. (2008) Customer satisfaction and loyalty in the eyes of new and repeat customers. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 18(6), 623-643. DOI: 10.1108/0960452081092010310.1108/09604520810920103]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M., Shires, J. and White, P. (2006) The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy, 13(4), 295-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.00410.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.004]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Powers, D. A. and Xie, Y. (2000) Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. San Diego, California: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012563736-7/50005-7]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Quddus, M. A., Wang, C. and Ison, S. G. (2010) Road traffic congestion and crash severity: Econometric analysis using ordered response models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136(5), 424-435. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000004410.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000044]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T. and Hartig, T. (2013) Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.00510.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Román, C., Martín, J. C. and Espino, R. (2014) Using stated preferences to analyze the service quality of public transport. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 28-46. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75846010.1080/15568318.2012.758460]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Shay, E. and Khattak, A. J. (2010) Toward sustainable transport: Conventional and disruptive approaches in the US context. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4(1), 14-40. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75852310.1080/15568318.2012.758523]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Stathopoulos, A. and Marcucci, E. (2014) De gustibus disputandum est: Non-linearity in public transportation service quality evaluation. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 47-68. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.75852310.1080/15568318.2012.758523]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Steg, L. and Gifford, R. (2005) Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.00310.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[42. St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D. and El-Geneidy, A. (2014) The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 160-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.00410.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Too, L. and Earl, G. (2010) Public transport service quality and sustainable development: a community stakeholder perspective. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 51-61. DOI: 10.1002/sd.41210.1002/sd.412]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Tyrinopoulos, Y. and Antoniou, C. (2008). Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications, Transport Policy, 15(4), 260-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.00210.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Turkish General Directorate of State Airports Authority. (2014a) 2013 Annual report. Ankara: Turkey.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Turkish General Directorate of State Airports Authority. (2014b) Passenger traffic (arrival-departure). Ankara: Turkey.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Turkish Ministry of Development. (2012) Turkey’s sustainable development report: Claiming the future, 2012. Ankara: Turkey.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Turkish Ministry of Transport. (2010). Türkiye ulaşım ve iletişim stratejisi: Hedef 2023. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications. (2013a) Ulaşan ve erişen Türkiye, 2013. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications. (2013b) İstatistiklerle ulaştırma denizcilik ve haberleşme. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish).]Search in Google Scholar
[51. TurkStat. (2012) 2011 Life Satisfaction Survey dataset. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara: Turkey.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. TurkStat. (2013) 2013 Life Satisfaction Survey dataset. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara: Turkey.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. TurkStat. (2014a) Motorlu kara yaşıtları haber bülteni, Ağustos 2014. Ankara: Turkey (in Turkish)]Search in Google Scholar
[54. TurkStat. (2014b) The number of freights and passengers in local ports. Ankara: Turkey.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G. and Mannering, F. L. (2003) Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. .10.1201/9780203497111]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58-82. Retrieved from http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st009710.1177/1536867X0600600104]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Williams, R. (2010) Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm, The Stata Journal, 10(4), 540-567. Retrieved from http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0208]Search in Google Scholar