[ANTONIOU, M., BEST, C.T., TYLER, M.D. and KROOS, C., 2011. Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic codeswitching. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 39, no.4, pp. 558-570.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001]Search in Google Scholar
[BARLOW, J., BRANSON, P. and NIP, I., 2013. Phonetic equivalence in the acquisition of/l/by Spanish-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol.16, no. 1, pp. 68-85.10.1017/S1366728912000235]Search in Google Scholar
[BEAVER, D., CLARK, B., FLEMMING, E., JAEGER, T. and WOLTERS, M., 2007. When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second-occurrence focus. Language, vol. 83, no. 2, pp.245-276.10.1353/lan.2007.0053]Search in Google Scholar
[BOERSMA, P., 2002. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, vol. 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[BONGAERTS, T., PLANKEN, B. and SCHILS, E., 1995. Can late starters attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. The age factor in second language acquisition, pp. 30-50.10.21832/9781800418240-003]Search in Google Scholar
[BONGAERTS, T., 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In: D. Birdsong, ed. Second language learning and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Browman Associates, pp. 133-159]Search in Google Scholar
[BROWMAN, C. and GOLDSTEIN, L., 1992. Targetless schwa: An articulatory analysis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody, pp. 26-56.10.1017/CBO9780511519918.003]Search in Google Scholar
[BURZIO, L., 2007. Phonology and phonetics of English stress and vowel reduction. Language Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 154-176.10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.019]Search in Google Scholar
[BYBEE, J., 2012. Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivation for sound change. The initiation of sound change: Perception, production, and social factors, pp. 211-234.10.1075/cilt.323.16byb]Search in Google Scholar
[BYERS, E., 2012. Reduced vowel production in American English among Spanish-English bilinguals. Miami, Florida: Florida International University Electronic Thesis. Available at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1906&context=etd.]Search in Google Scholar
[BYERS, E. and YAVAS, M., 2016. Durational variability of schwa in early and late Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, vol. 20, pp. 190-209.10.1177/1367006914547936]Search in Google Scholar
[CARTER, P. and LYNCH, A., 2015. Multilingual Miami: Current trends in sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass, vol. 9, pp. 369-385.10.1111/lnc3.12157]Search in Google Scholar
[CHOMSKY, N. and HALLE, M., 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.]Search in Google Scholar
[DALBY, J., 1986. Phonetic structure of fast speech in American English. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[DUNN, A. and FOXTREE, J., 2009. A quick, gradient bilingual dominance scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 12, pp. 273-289.10.1017/S1366728909990113]Search in Google Scholar
[ENZINNA, N., 2015. The Spanish-influenced prosody in Miami English. In: A. Chong, et al. eds. Cornell Working Papers in Phonetics and Phonology. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 78-120.]Search in Google Scholar
[ENZINNA, N., 2016. Spanish-influenced rhythm in Miami English. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, vol. 1, pp.34-41.10.3765/plsa.v1i0.3733]Search in Google Scholar
[ERICKSON, D., 2002. Articulation of extreme formant patterns for emphasized vowels. Phonetica, vol. 59, no. 2-3, pp. 134-49.10.1159/000066067]Search in Google Scholar
[FLEGE, J.E., 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, vol.15, no.1, pp. 47-65.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6]Search in Google Scholar
[FLEGE, J., 1995. Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In: W. Strange, ed. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 78-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[FLEGE, J. E. 2005. Origins and development of the speech learning Model. Retrieved December, 13, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[FLEGE, J., BIRDSONG, D., BIALYSTOK, E., MACK, M., SUNG, H. and TSUKADA, K., 2006. Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 153-175.10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[FLEGE, J.E. and BOHN, O.S., 1989. An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol.11, issue 1, pp. 35-62.10.1017/S0272263100007828]Search in Google Scholar
[FLEMMING, E., 2009. The phonetics of schwa vowels. In: D. Minkova, ed. Phonological weakness in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 78-98.10.1007/978-0-230-29686-2_5]Search in Google Scholar
[FLEMMING, E. and JOHNSON, S., 2007. Rosa’s roses: Reduced vowels in American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, vol. 37, pp. 83-96.10.1017/S0025100306002817]Search in Google Scholar
[Florida International University. (2017). About us. Accessed 2-23-2017. Available at: http://www.fiu.edu/about-us/.]Search in Google Scholar
[FOKES, J. and BOND, Z., 1993. The elusive/illusive syllable. Phonetica, vol. 50, pp. 102-123.10.1159/000261929]Search in Google Scholar
[FOURAKIS, M., 1991. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1816-1827.10.1121/1.401662]Search in Google Scholar
[FOWLER, C.A. and BRANCAZIO, L., 2000. Coarticulation resistance of American English consonants and its effects on transconsonantal vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Language and Speech, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1-41.10.1177/00238309000430010101]Search in Google Scholar
[FOWLER, C., SRAMKO, V., OSTRY, D., ROWLAND, S. and HALLÉ, P., 2008. Cross-language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 34, pp. 649-663.10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[GAHL, S., YAO, Y. and JOHNSON, K., 2012. Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 789-806.10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[GARDNER, W., 1986. Measurement of spectral correlation. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1111-1123.10.1109/TASSP.1986.1164951]Search in Google Scholar
[GICK, B., 2002. An x-ray investigation of pharyngeal constriction in American English schwa. Phonetica, vol. 59, pp. 38-48.10.1159/000056204]Search in Google Scholar
[GOLDSTEIN, L., 2011. Back to the past tense in English. Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen. Santa Cruz, California: Linguistics Research Center, pp. 69-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[GROSJEAN, F., 2008. Studying bilinguals. Boston, MA: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[GUION, S.G., HARADA, T. and CLARK, J., 2004. Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 7, pp. 207-226.10.1017/S1366728904001592]Search in Google Scholar
[GUT, U., 2007. Foreign accent. Speaker classification I. Berlin: Springer Publishing, pp.75-87.10.1007/978-3-540-74200-5_4]Search in Google Scholar
[GUT, U. (2010): Cross-linguistic influence in l3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, vol. 7, pp. 19-38.10.1080/14790710902972248]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMMOND, M., 1997. Vowel quantity and syllabification in English. Language, pp. 1-17.10.2307/416591]Search in Google Scholar
[HAYES, B., KIRCHNER, R. and STERIADE, D., 2008. Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[HERTRICH, I. and ACKERMANN, H., 1995. Coarticulation in slow speech: durational and spectral analysis. Language and Speech, vol.38, no. 2, pp. 159-187.10.1177/002383099503800203]Search in Google Scholar
[HITCHCOCK, L. and GREENBERG, S., 2001. Vowel height is intimately associated with stress accent in spontaneous American English discourse. INTERSPEECH, pp. 79-82.10.21437/Eurospeech.2001-32]Search in Google Scholar
[HUBER, J.E. et al. 1999. Formants of children, women, and men: The effects of vocal intensity variation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , vol.106, no.3, pp. 1532-154210.1121/1.427150]Search in Google Scholar
[JOHNSON, K., 2003. Acoustic and auditory phonetics. 2nd edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[JONES, D., 1922. An outline of English phonetics. Leipzig: Germany. BG Teubner.]Search in Google Scholar
[KANG, K.H. and GUION, S.G., 2006. Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals a. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, no.3, pp. 1672-1683.10.1121/1.2166607]Search in Google Scholar
[KLATT, D.,1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 59, pp. 1208-1221.10.1121/1.380986]Search in Google Scholar
[KLATT, D. and COOPER, W., 1975. Perception of segment duration in sentence contexts. In Structure and process in speech perception. Berlin: Springer Publishing, pp. 69-89.10.1007/978-3-642-81000-8_5]Search in Google Scholar
[KONDO, Y., 1994. Targetless schwa: is that how we get the impression of stress timing in English. In: Proceedings of the Edinburgh Linguistics Department Conference, vol. 94, pp. 63-76.]Search in Google Scholar
[KUHL, P., ANDRUSKI, J., CHISTOVICH, I., CHISTOVICH, L., KOZHEVNIKOVA, E., RYSKINA, V., STOLYAROVA, E., SUNDBERG, U. and LACERDA, F., 1997. Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, vol. 277, no. 5326, pp. 684-686.10.1126/science.277.5326.684]Search in Google Scholar
[LABOV, W., ASH, S. and BOBERG, C., 2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Germany. Walter de Gruyter Publishing.10.1515/9783110167467]Search in Google Scholar
[LADEFOGED, P.,1993. A course in phonetics. Fort Worth, Texas: Hartcourt Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[LENNES, M., 2011. SpeCT- The Speech Corpus Toolkit for PRAAT (Script). Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/~lennes/praat-scripts.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEE, B., GUION, S. and HARADA, T., 2006. Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 28, pp. 487-513.10.1017/S0272263106060207]Search in Google Scholar
[LI, P., ZHANG, F., TSAI, E. and PULS, B., 2013. Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 17, pp. 673-680.10.1017/S1366728913000606]Search in Google Scholar
[LINDBLOM, B., 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 35, pp. 1773-1781.10.1121/1.1918816]Search in Google Scholar
[LINDBLOM, B., 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In: Speech production and speech modelling. The Netherlands: Springer Publishing, pp. 403-439.10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16]Search in Google Scholar
[LOPEZ, L., 2015. Vowels in the 305: A First Pass at Miami Latino English. Miami, Florida: Florida International University Electronic Theses. Available at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3009&context=etd.]Search in Google Scholar
[LULICH, S., 2014. Combined analysis of real-time three-dimensional tongue ultrasound and digitized three-dimensional palate impressions: Methods and findings. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 24, pp. 2104-2104.10.1121/1.4899568]Search in Google Scholar
[MARIAN, V., BLUMENFELD, H. and KAUSHANSKAYA, M., 2007. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 940-967.10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)]Search in Google Scholar
[MARINOVA-TODD, S., 2003. Comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Microfilms.]Search in Google Scholar
[McAULIFFE, M., ROBB, M. and MURDOCH, B. 2007. Acoustic and perceptial analysis of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 21, pp. 885-894.]Search in Google Scholar
[MORRISON, G., 2008. L1-Spanish speakers’ acquisition of the English/i/-/I/ contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech, vol. 51, pp. 285-315.10.1177/0023830908099067]Search in Google Scholar
[NEVINS, A., 2011. Phonologically-conditioned allomorph selection. The Companion to Phonology, pp. 2357-2382.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0099]Search in Google Scholar
[NUSBAUM, H., PISONI, D. and DAVIS, C., 1984. Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 357-376.]Search in Google Scholar
[OLIVE, J., GREENWOOD, A. and COLEMAN, J., 1993. Acoustics of American English Speech: A Dynamic Approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.]Search in Google Scholar
[OLLER, D., EILERS, R., URBANO, R. and COBO-LEWIS, A., 1997. Development of precursors to speech in infants exposed to two languages. Journal of Child Language, vol. 24, pp. 407-425.10.1017/S0305000997003097]Search in Google Scholar
[ORTEGA-LLEBARIA, M., PRIETO, P., and del MAR VANRELL, M., 2007. Perceptual evidence for direct acoustic correlates of stress in Spanish. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 1121-1124.]Search in Google Scholar
[PETERSON, G.E. and BARNEY, H.L., 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175-184.10.1121/1.1906875]Search in Google Scholar
[PISKE, T., FLEGE, J., MACKAY, I. and MEADOR, D., 2002. The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 49-71.10.1159/000056205]Search in Google Scholar
[PLUYMAEKERS, M., ERNESTUS, M. and BAAYEN, R.H., 2005. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.118, no. 4, pp. 2561-2569.10.1121/1.2011150]Search in Google Scholar
[RONQUEST, R., 2013. An acoustic examination of unstressed vowel reduction in heritage Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, pp. 151-171.]Search in Google Scholar
[SANCIER, M. and FOWLER, C., 1997. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 25, pp. 421-436.10.1006/jpho.1997.0051]Search in Google Scholar
[SHOCKEY, L., 2008. Sound patterns of spoken English. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[SILVERMAN, D., 2011. Schwa. In: E. van Oostendorp, E. and R. Hume, eds. The Blackwell companion to phonology. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0026]Search in Google Scholar
[STEVENS, K. and HOUSE, A., 1963. Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research.10.1044/jshr.0602.111]Search in Google Scholar
[TAUBERER, J. and EVANINI, K., 2009. Intrinsic vowel duration and the post-vocalic voicing effect: some evidence from dialects of North-American English. INTERSPEECH, pp. 2211-2214.10.21437/Interspeech.2009-629]Search in Google Scholar
[TROFIMOVICH, P. and BAKER, W. 2006. Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1-3010.1017/S0272263106060013]Search in Google Scholar
[UMEDA, N., 1975. Vowel duration in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 434-445.10.1121/1.380688]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN OOSTENDORP, M., 1995. Vowel quality and syllable projection. Tilburg: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.]Search in Google Scholar
[WRIGHT, R., 2003. Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In: J. Local, R. Ogden and R. Temple, eds. Papers in laboratory phonology VI: Phonetic interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75-87.]Search in Google Scholar
[YAVAŞ, M. and BYERS, E., 2014. Production of voiceless stops in early sequential bilinguals. Unusual productions in phonology: Universal and language-specific considerations. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 242-258.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZAMPINI, M., 2008. L2 speech production research. Phonology and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 219-250.10.1075/sibil.36.11zam]Search in Google Scholar