BETWEEN THE RIGHT AND THE COMMON. HOW GROUPS REACT TO SOCIALLY UNDESIRABLE BEHAVIOUR

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M. 2006. Psychologia społeczna. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka. Search in Google Scholar

Chwe, M. S. Y. 2000. Communication and coordination in social networks. Review of Economic Studies, 67(1), 1-16. Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, James S. 1986. Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology: 1309-1335. 10.1086/228423Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Coleman, J., Katz, E. & Menzel, H. 1957. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20(4), 253-270. 10.2307/2785979Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Easley, David & Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Vol. 8 Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511761942Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Peter, JoachimI. Krueger, Tobias Greitemeyer, Claudia Vogrincic, Andreas Kastenmüller, Dieter Frey, Moritz Heene, Magdalena Wicher, and Martina Kainbacher. 2011. “The Bystander-Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review on Bystander Intervention in Dangerous and Non-Dangerous Emergencies. Psychological Bulletin 137 (4): 517-537. 10.1037/a0023304Search in Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. & Soong, R. 1983. Treshold models of diffusion and collective behavior. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 9, 165-179. 10.1080/0022250X.1983.9989941Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Haman, Jacek. 2014. Gry wokoł nas. Socjolog i teoria gier. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Matthew O. 2008. Social and Economic Networks Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400833993Search in Google Scholar

Kärnä, Annti, Marinus Voeten, Elisa Poskiparta & Christina Salmivalli. 2010. Vulnerable Children in Varying Classroom Contexts: Bystanders’ Behaviors Moderate the Effects of Risk Factors on Victimization. “Merrill-Palmer Quarterly” 56 (3): 261-282. 10.1353/mpq.0.0052Search in Google Scholar

Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2009. Grzech zaniechania. Świadkowie przemocy szkolnej w perspektywie teorii gier. “Decyzje” 11: 5-47. Search in Google Scholar

Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2013.Między głosem sumienia a więzami przyjaźni. Zachowanie świadkow dręczenia (bullying) a struktura klasy szkolnej. Decyzje, nr 20/2013, s. 67-104. Search in Google Scholar

Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2014a. Świadkowie przemocy na strukturalnym polu minowym. Analiza zależności między strukturą grupy a zakresem reakcji na agresję. Decyzje, nr 2/2014. Search in Google Scholar

Komendant-Brodowska, Agata. 2014b. Grupowe uwarunkowania przemocy szkolnej. Doctoral thesis, available at the University of Warsaw. https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/749 Search in Google Scholar

Lelarge, M. 2012. Diffusion and cascading behavior in random networks. Games and Economic Behavior, 75(2), 752-775. 10.1016/j.geb.2012.03.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Olweus, Dan. 1993. Bullying at School: What we Know and what we can Do. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Palfrey, T. R. & Rosenthal, H. 1984. Participation and the provision of discrete public goods: A strategic analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 24(2), 171-193.10.1016/0047-2727(84)90023-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press, Simon and Shuster. Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, B. & Gross, N. C. 1950. Acceptance and diffusion of hybrid corn seed in two Iowa communities. Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts. Search in Google Scholar