<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Does a high degree of confirmation make an inductive argument valid? I will argue that it depends on the kind of question to which the argument is meant to be providing an answer. We should distinguish inductive generalization from inductive extrapolation even in cases where they might appear to have the same answer, and also from confirmation of a hypothesis.</p></abstract>

Does a high degree of confirmation make an inductive argument valid? I will argue that it depends on the kind of question to which the argument is meant to be providing an answer. We should distinguish inductive generalization from inductive extrapolation even in cases where they might appear to have the same answer, and also from confirmation of a hypothesis.

High Confirmation and Inductive Validity

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"High Confirmation and Inductive Validity"}

Does a high degree of confirmation make an inductive argument valid? I will argue that it depends on the kind of question to which the argument is meant to be...

High Confirmation and Inductive Validity

Pubblicato online: 23 nov 2016

Pagine: 119 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0036

Parole chiave
probability, inductive generalization, inductive validity, confirmation

© 2016 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

High Confirmation and Inductive Validity

Pubblicato online: 23 nov 2016

Pagine: 119 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0036

Parole chiaveprobability, inductive generalization, inductive validity, confirmation

© 2016 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Parole chiave
probability, inductive generalization, inductive validity, confirmation