Interactivity And Mental Arithmetic: Coupling Mind And World Transforms And Enhances Performance

Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 3–34.Search in Google Scholar

Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 197–205.10.1177/0734282908330580Search in Google Scholar

Baber, C., Parekh, M., & Cengiz, T. G. (2014). Tool use as distributed cognition: how tools help, hinder and define manual skill. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 116.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00116Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, R. A., Avraamides, M. N., Cary, M., & Strasberg, S. (2007). What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 747–756.10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.747Search in Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2010). Material surrogacy and the supernatural: Reflections on the role of artefacts in “off-line” cognition. In L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind (pp. 23–28). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Search in Google Scholar

DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 353–386.10.1080/09541440244000328Search in Google Scholar

Fu, W., & Gray, W.D. (2000). Memory versus perceptual-motor tradeoffs in a blocks world task. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society. (pp. 154–159). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279–297.10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.279Search in Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516–522.10.1111/1467-9280.00395Search in Google Scholar

Gray, W.D., & Fu, W-T. (2004). Soft constraints behavior: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cogntive Science, 28, 359–382.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive Theory (pp. 21–41). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-USearch in Google Scholar

Kirsh, D. (2013). Thinking with external representation. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 171–194). London: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Magnani, L. (2007). Semiotic brains and artificial minds: How brains make up material cognitive systems. In R. Gudwin & J. Queiroz (Eds.), Semiotics and Intelligent Systems Development (pp. 1–41). Hershey: Idea Group.Search in Google Scholar

Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Moyer, P.S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 175–197.10.1023/A:1014596316942Search in Google Scholar

Neth, H., & Payne, S. J. (2001). Addition as Interactive Problem Solving. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 698–703). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Neth, H., & Payne, S. J. (2011). Interactive coin addition: How hands can help us think. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 279–284). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.) Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press Columbia University.Search in Google Scholar

Schiefele, U., & Csikszentmihaly, M. (1995). Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement. Journal for Research into Mathematics Education, 26, 163–181.10.2307/749208Search in Google Scholar

Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihaly, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). Interactivity, efficiency, and individual differences in mental arithmetic. Experimental Psychology, 60, 302–311.10.1027/1618-3169/a000200Search in Google Scholar

Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Euden, G., & Hearn, V. (2011). Einstellung defused: Interactivity and mental set. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1889–1895.10.1080/17470218.2011.605151Search in Google Scholar

Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Sirota, M., & Villejoubert, G. (2013). Reducing the impact of math anxiety on mental arithmetic: The importance of distributed cognition. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3615–3620). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3Search in Google Scholar