[Baratta, A. M. 2010. Nominalization development across an undergraduate academic degree program. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1017-1036.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bhatia V. K. 1993. Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, D. 1995. Dimensions of register variation. A cross linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519871]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, D., & Gray, B. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2-20.10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, D., & Gray, B. 2013. “Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing”. In B. Aarts & G. Leech (Eds.). The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 99-13210.1017/CBO9781139060998.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. 2004. The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.10.4324/9780203774854]Search in Google Scholar
[Bondi, M., & Hyland, K. 2006. “Introduction”. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines. Germany: Peter Lang. pp. 7-1710.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Briones, S., Fortuny, L., Sastre, S., & Pocovi, M. B. 2003. Grammatical metaphors in scientific English. The ESPecialist, 24 (2), 131-142.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chafe, W., & Danielewicz, J. 1987. “Properties of spoken and written language”. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language. San Diego, C.A.: Academic Press Inc. pp. 83-113]Search in Google Scholar
[Davtgari Asl, H., & Shahab, S. 2015. Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in Pharmaceutical Research Articles. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities, 3(4), 111-116.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eggins, S. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Galve, G. I. 1998. The textual interplay of grammatical metaphor on the nominalization occurring in written medical English. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 363-385.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00002-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gardner, D., & Davies, M. 2013. A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 1-24.10.1093/applin/amt015]Search in Google Scholar
[Granger, S. 1997. “On identifying the syntactic and discourse features of participle clauses in academic English: Native and nonnative writers compared”. In J. Aarts, I. de Monnink, & H. Wekker (Eds.), Studies in English language and teaching. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 185-198]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K. 1998. “Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge”. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge. pp. 185-236]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. 1999. Construing experience through meaning, a language based approach to cognition. New York: Norfolk.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. 2005.Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood, S. 2004. Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Technology, Sydney.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jalilifar, A., Alipour, M., & Parsa, S. 2014. A comparative study of nominalization in applied linguistics and biology books. Research in Applied Linguistics, 5, 24-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kazemian, B., Behnam, B., & Ghafoori, N. 2013. Ideational grammatical metaphor in scientific texts: A Hallidayan perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 146-168.10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lim, J. M. H. 2006. Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282-309.10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mahbudi, A., Mahbudi, L., & Amalsaleh, E. 2014. A comparison between the use of nominalization in medical papers by English and Iranian writers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(6), 1-6.10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.6p.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, J. R. 2008. Incongruent and proud: De-vilifying nominalization. Discourse and Society, 19, 801-810.10.1177/0957926508095895]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinez, I. A. 2003. Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 103-123.10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00003-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravelli, J. L. 2003. “Renewal of connection: integrating theory and practice in an understanding of grammatical metaphor”. In A. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers, & J. L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 37-64). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.236.04rav]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarnackaitė, V. 2011. Nominalization as a cohesive device in political discourse. Unpublished Bachelor thesis, University of Lithuania.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sayfouri, N. 2010. SFL and ESP genre analysis of English research articles in Iranian and English-American medical journals: A contrastive study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran, Iran.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shirali, F. 2014. A comparative study of nominalization in an English applied linguistics textbook and its Persian translation. Unpublished master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Susinskiene, S. 2009. Textual functions of nominalizations in English scientific discourse. Zmogus ir zodis, 11(3), 58-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Susinskiene, S. 2010. Nominalization as a cohesive device in British newspaper editorials. Filologija, 15, 142-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 1994. Academic writing for graduate students: A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taverniers, M. 2003. “Grammatical metaphor in SFL: A historiography of the introduction and initial study of the term”. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. J.Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 236.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp.5-3310.1075/cilt.236.02tav]Search in Google Scholar
[Taverniers, M. 2004. Grammatical metaphors in English. Modern Sprak, 98(1), 17-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[To, V., Le, T., & Le, Q. 2013. A comparative study of nominalisation in IELTS writing test papers. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 1(4), 15-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vongpumivitch, V., Huang, J., & Chang, Y. 2009. Frequency analysis of the words in the Academic Word List (AWL) and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 33-41.10.1016/j.esp.2008.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenyan, G. 2012. Nominalization in medical papers: A comparative study. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(1), 86-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xue-feng, W. 2012. Developing nominalization awareness in teaching writing to Chinese learners of English. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(11), 1650-1660.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zinsser, W. 1980. On writing well. New York: Harper.]Search in Google Scholar