Governmental Research Support Programs and Private Entities in Slovakia

AGHION, P.; HOWITT, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica. 1992, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 323-351.10.2307/2951599Search in Google Scholar

ARROW, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 1962. ISBN: 0-87014-304-2.Search in Google Scholar

BALÁŽ, V. (2005). Politika Inovácií V Slovenskej Republike. Politická ekonomie. 2005, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 513-526.Search in Google Scholar

BARAJAS, A.; HUERGO, E. (2010). International R&D cooperation within EU framework programe: the case of spanish firms. In Economics of Innovation and new technology - Special Issue on the Role and Dynamics of Corporate R&D. 2010, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 87-111.Search in Google Scholar

BUSOM, I. (2000). Empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. In Economics of innovation and new technology. 2000. Vol. 9, No.2, pp. 111-148.10.1080/10438590000000006Search in Google Scholar

CZARNITZKI, D.; FIER, A. (2002). Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment? Evidence from German service sector. Applied Economics Quarterly. 2002, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 1-25.Search in Google Scholar

ČAPLÁNOVÁ, A.; SIVÁK, R.; HUDSON, J. (2012). Vplyv priamych zahraničných investícií na inovačnú činnosť firiem. Politická ekonomie. 2012, Vol 60, No. 6, pp. 764779.Search in Google Scholar

DUBRAVSKÁ, M.; Širá, E. (2014). Analýza vybraných ukazovatel'ov rozvoja ino-vatívneho prostredia v SR a ČR. In XVII. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách. Sborník příspěvků. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, (ISBN 978-80-210-6840-7, p. 194-200)10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-6840-2014-23Search in Google Scholar

DUGUET, E. (2004). Are subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data. Revue Economie Politique. 2004, Vol. 114. No. 2 pp. 263-292.Search in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMISSION. (2011). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011. [PRO INNO Europe®]. European Union 2012. ISBN 978-92-79-23174-2. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2011_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMISSION. (2011). Lessons from a Decade of Innovation Policy -What can be learnt from the INNO Policy TrendChart and The Innovation Union Scoreboard - Executive Summary.Search in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMISSION. (2013). Research and Innovation Performance in Slovakia -Country Profile. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 97892-79-30866-6.Search in Google Scholar

GEOGHEGAN-QUINN, M. (2010). Address by Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on European Affairs. Príspevok prezentovaný pred Joint Oireachtas Committee on European Affairs, Dublin, 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/ireland/press_office/speeches-press_releases/maire-geoghegan-quinn-speech-european-affairs-committee_en.htmSearch in Google Scholar

GRIFFITH, R. (2000). How important is business R&D for economic growth and should the government subsidise it? London: Institue for Fiscal studies, 2000. ISBN 1903274-13-3.Search in Google Scholar

GROSSMAN, G. M.; HELPMAN, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1994. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 23-44.10.1257/jep.8.1.23Search in Google Scholar

HERRERA L.; IBARRA B. (2010). Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size. Intangible capital. 2010. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 272299.10.3926/ic.2010.v6n2.p272-299Search in Google Scholar

HESHMATI, A.; LOOF, H. (2005). The impact of public funds on private R&D investment. New evidence from a firm level innovation study [MTT Discussion Papers 3 -11682] Agrifood Research Finland. 2005.Search in Google Scholar

HULYA, U. (2004). R&D, innovation, and economic growth: an empirical analysis [Working Paper No. 04/185] International Monetary Fund: Research department, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

JONES, C. (1995). R&D based model of economic growth. Journal of political economy. 1995, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 759-784.10.1086/262002Search in Google Scholar

JONES C.; WILIAMS J. (2000). Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D . Journal of Economic Growth. 2000, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 65-85.Search in Google Scholar

KOTULIČ, R. (2006). Foreign Direct Investments and Their Influence on Economic Growth and Regional Development. Review of Economic Perspectives. 2006. No. 2, pp. 15-25. ISSN: ISSN 1804-1663.Search in Google Scholar

KUNCL, M. (2010). Cesta k obnově růstu: inovace, pracovní místa a čistý růst (globální fórum OECD 2010 v Paříži). Politická ekonomie. 2010, Vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 830 - 837.10.18267/j.polek.766Search in Google Scholar

LACH S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The journal of industrial economics. 2002, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 369-390.10.1111/1467-6451.00182Search in Google Scholar

LEVIN, R. C., KLEVORICK, A. K., NELSON, R. R., WINTER, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987, Vol. 3, pp. 783-832.10.2307/2534454Search in Google Scholar

LUCAS R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics. 1988. Vol. 22, No.1, pp. 3-42.10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7Search in Google Scholar

MANSFIELD, E.; SCHWARTZ, M.; WAGNER, S. (1981). Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study. Economic Journal. 1981, Vol. 91, pp. 907-918.10.2307/2232499Search in Google Scholar

MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2011). Minerva 2.0 -Slovensko do prvej ligy. Uznesenie vlády Slovenskej republiky.Search in Google Scholar

MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2014). Čerpanie štruktu-rálnych fondov, Kohézneho fondu a Európskeho fondu pre rybné hospodárstvo k 31.12.2013.Search in Google Scholar

MINISTRY OF ECONOMY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2007). Inovačná straté-gia SR na roky 2007 až 2013.Search in Google Scholar

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND SPORT OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. (2010). Dlhodobý zámer štátnej vednej a technickej politiky do roku 2015.Search in Google Scholar

PESSOA, A. (2010). R&D and economic growth: How strong is the link? Economic Letters. 2010, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 152-154.Search in Google Scholar

PRNO, I. (2008). Investičná a inovačná politika. Bratislava: Merkury s.r.o, 2008. 218 s. ISBN 978-80-89143-85-6.Search in Google Scholar

ROMER, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990, Vol. 5, No. 98, pp. 71-102.10.1086/261725Search in Google Scholar

SEGERSTROM, P.S.; T. C. A. ANANT, T., C., A.; DINOPOULOS,. (1990). A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle. The American Economic Review. 1990, Vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 1077-1091.Search in Google Scholar

Science and Technology Policy (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2014, from http://sovva.sk/science-and-technology-policySearch in Google Scholar

ÚRAD VLÁDY SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY. 2010. Lisabonská stratégia a Slovensko. 2010.Search in Google Scholar

ZACHARIADIS M. (2004). R&D, innovation, and technological progress: a test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics. 2003, Vol. 36, No.3, pp. 566-586.Search in Google Scholar

ZEMPLINEROVÁ, A. (2010). Inovační aktivita firem a konkurence. Politická ekonomie. 2010, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 747-760.Search in Google Scholar

ZENG J. (2000). Innovative vs. imitative R&D and economic growth. Journal of Development economics. 2000, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 499-528.Search in Google Scholar