[1. Jones DL, Wagers AJ. No place like home: anatomy and function of the stem cell niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9: 11-21.10.1038/nrm231918097443]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Tropepe V, Turksen K. The ontogeny of somatic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 2012; 8: 548-50.10.1007/s12015-012-9370-y22529018]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Moore K A, Lemischka IR. Stem cells and their niches. Science 2006; 311: 1880-5.10.1126/science.111054216574858]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Turksen K. Adult stem cells and cardiac regeneration. Stem Cell Rev 2013; 9: 537-40.10.1007/s12015-013-9448-123775698]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006; 126: 663-76.10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.02416904174]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Shi Y, Kirwan P, Livesey FJ. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cerebral cortex neurons and neural networks. Nat Protoc 2012; 7: 1836-46.10.1038/nprot.2012.11622976355]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Lian X, Zhang J, Azarin SM, Zhu K, Hazeltine LB, Bao X, et al. Directed cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells by modulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling under fully defined conditions. Nat Protoc 2013; 8: 162-75.10.1038/nprot.2012.150361296823257984]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Bratt-Leal AM, Carpenedo RL, McDevitt TC. Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryonic stem cell differentiation. Biotechnol Prog 2009; 25: 43-51.10.1002/btpr.139269301419198003]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Kurosawa H. Methods for inducing embryoid body formation: in vitro differentiation system of embryonic stem cells. J Biosci Bioeng 2007; 103: 389-98.10.1263/jbb.103.38917609152]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Detante O. Intravenous stem cells after ischemic stroke (ISIS). 2014. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00875654. Accessed 8 March 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Vescovi AL. Human neural stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (hNSCALS). 2014. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01640067. Accessed 8 March 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Lamo-Espinosa J, Prosper F, Blanco J. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis by intra-articular injection of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. 2014. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02123368. Accessed 8 March 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Isa N. Evidence based radiation oncology with existing technology. Reports Pract Oncol Radiother 2014; 19: 259-66.10.1016/j.rpor.2013.09.002410401925061519]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Valerie K, Yacoub A, Hagan MP, Curiel DT, Fisher PB, Grant S, et al. Radiation-induced cell signaling: inside-out and outside-in. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6: 789-801.10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-059617363476]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Rodemann HP, Blaese MA. Responses of normal cells to ionizing radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol 2007; 17: 81-8.10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.11.00517395038]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Paulino AC, Constine LS, Rubin P, Williams JP. Normal tissue development, homeostasis, senescence, and the sensitivity to radiation injury across the age spectrum. Semin Radiat Oncol 2010; 20: 12-20.10.1016/j.semradonc.2009.08.00319959027]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Schwenke K, Peterson HP, von Wangenheim KH, Feinendegen LE. Radiation-enhanced differentiation of erythroid progenitor cells and its relation to reproductive cell death. Int J Radiat Biol 1996; 69: 309-17.10.1080/0955300961458698613680]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Von Wangenheim KH, Peterson HP, Schwenke K. Review: a major component of radiation action: interference with intracellular control of differentiation. Int J Radiat Biol 1995; 68: 369-88.10.1080/095530095145513217594962]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Fortini P, Ferretti C, Dogliotti E. The response to DNA damage during differentiation: pathways and consequences. Mutat Res 2013; 743-744: 160-8.10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.03.00423562804]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Nagaria P, Robert C, Rassool F V. DNA double-strand break response in stem cells: mechanisms to maintain genomic integrity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1830: 2345-53.10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.00122995214]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Rocha CRR, Lerner LK, Okamoto OK, Marchetto MC, Menck CFM. The role of DNA repair in the pluripotency and differentiation of human stem cells. Mutat Res 2013; 752: 25-35.10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.09.00123010441]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Tichy ED, Pillai R, Deng L, Liang L, Tischfield J, Schwemberger SJ, et al. Mouse embryonic stem cells, but not somatic cells, predominantly use homologous recombination to repair double-strand DNA breaks. Stem Cells Dev 2010; 19: 1699-711.10.1089/scd.2010.0058312831120446816]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Liu JC, Guan X, Ryan JA, Rivera AG, Mock C, Agrawal V, et al. High mitochondrial priming sensitizes hESCs to DNA-damage-induced apoptosis. Cell Stem Cell 2013; 13: 483-91.10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.018410964723954752]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Sokolov M V, Neumann RD. Radiation-induced bystander effects in cultured human stem cells. PLoS One 2010; 5: e14195.10.1371/journal.pone.0014195299628021152027]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Lan ML, Acharya MM, Tran KK, Bahari-Kashani J, Patel NH, Strnadel J, et al. Characterizing the radioresponse of pluripotent and multipotent human stem cells. PLoS One 2012; 7: e50048.10.1371/journal.pone.0050048352268923272054]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Adams BR, Golding SE, Rao RR, Valerie K. Dynamic dependence on ATR and ATM for double-strand break repair in human embryonic stem cells and neural descendants. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10001.10.1371/journal.pone.0010001284885520368801]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Blanpain C, Mohrin M, Sotiropoulou PA, Passegué E. DNA-damage response in tissue-specific and cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2011; 8: 16-29.10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.01221211780]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Mandal PK, Blanpain C, Rossi DJ. DNA damage response in adult stem cells: pathways and consequences. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12: 198-202.10.1038/nrm306021304553]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Latella L, Lukas J, Simone C, Puri PL, Bartek J. Differentiation-induced radioresistance in muscle cells. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 6350-61.10.1128/MCB.24.14.6350-6361.200443424915226436]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Mohrin M, Bourke E, Alexander D, Warr MR, Barry-Holson K, Le Beau MM, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence promotes error-prone DNA repair and mutagenesis. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7: 174-85.10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.014292490520619762]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Zheng H, Ying H, Yan H, Kimmelman AC, Hiller DJ, Chen AJ, et al. p53 and Pten control neural and glioma stem/progenitor cell renewal and differentiation. Nature 2008; 455: 1129-33.10.1038/nature07443405143318948956]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Bonizzi G, Cicalese A, Insinga A, Pelicci PG. The emerging role of p53 in stem cells. Trends Mol Med 2014; 18: 6-12.10.1016/j.molmed.2011.08.00221907001]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Solozobova V, Blattner C. P53 in stem cells. World J Biol Chem 2011; 2: 202-14.10.4331/wjbc.v2.i9.202317875721949570]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Haupt S, Berger M, Goldberg Z, Haupt Y. Apoptosis - the p53 network. J Cell Sci 2003; 116: 4077-85.10.1242/jcs.0073912972501]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Yu J, Zhang L. The transcriptional targets of p53 in apoptosis control. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 331: 851-8.10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.18915865941]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Hong H, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T, Aoi T, Kanagawa O, Nakagawa M, et al. Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53–p21 pathway. Nature 2009; 460: 1132-5.10.1038/nature08235291723519668191]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Menendez S, Camus S, Belmonte JCI. p53: Guardian of reprogramming. Cell Cycle 2010; 9: 3887-91.10.4161/cc.9.19.1330120948296]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Tapia N, Schöler HR. P53 connects tumorigenesis and reprogramming to pluripotency. J Exp Med 2010; 207: 2045-8.10.1084/jem.20101866294707120876313]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Zheng H, Ying H, Yan H, Kimmelman AC, Hiller DJ, Chen AJ, et al. p53 and Pten control neural and glioma stem/progenitor cell renewal and differentiation. Nature 2008; 455: 1129-33.10.1038/nature07443405143318948956]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Dosch J, Lee CJ, Simeone DM. Cancer stem cells: pancreatic cancer. Stem Cells Cancer 2009; 414: 105-11.10.1007/978-1-60327-933-8_15]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Marión RM, Strati K, Li H, Murga M, Blanco R, Ortega S, et al. A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity. Nature 2009; 460: 1149-53.10.1038/nature08287362408919668189]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Dolezalova D, Mraz M, Barta T, Plevova K, Vinarsky V, Holubcova Z, et al. MicroRNAs regulate p21(Waf1/Cip1) protein expression and the DNA damage response in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 1362-72.10.1002/stem.110822511267]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Maimets T, Neganova I, Armstrong L, Lako M. Activation of p53 by nutlin leads to rapid differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 2008; 27: 5277-87.10.1038/onc.2008.16618521083]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Sabapathy K, Klemm M, Jaenisch R, Wagner EF. Regulation of ES cell differentiation by functional and conformational modulation of p53. EMBO J 1997; 16: 6217-29.10.1093/emboj/16.20.621713263069321401]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Jain AK, Allton K, Iacovino M, Mahen E, Milczarek RJ, Zwaka TP, et al. p53 regulates cell cycle and microRNAs to promote differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 2012; 10: e1001268.10.1371/journal.pbio.1001268328960022389628]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Okada Y, Shimazaki T, Sobue G, Okano H. Retinoic-acid-concentration-dependent acquisition of neural cell identity during in vitro differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 2004; 275: 124-42.10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.07.03815464577]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Burridge PW, Keller G, Gold JD, Wu JC. Production of de novo cardiomyocytes: human pluripotent stem cell differentiation and direct reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 10: 16-28.10.1016/j.stem.2011.12.013325507822226352]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Kawaguchi J, Mee PJ, Smith AG. Osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cells in response to specific growth factors. Bone 2005; 36: 758-69.10.1016/j.bone.2004.07.01915794925]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Lin T, Chao C, Saito S, Mazur SJ, Murphy ME, Appella E, et al. p53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7: 165-71.10.1038/ncb121115619621]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Dravid G, Ye Z, Hammond H, Chen G, Pyle A, Donovan P, et al. Defining the role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the survival, proliferation, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2005; 23: 1489-501.10.1634/stemcells.2005-003416002782]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Sato N, Meijer L, Skaltsounis L, Greengard P, Brivanlou AH. Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat Med 2004; 10: 55-63.10.1038/nm97914702635]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Taupin P, Gage FH. Adult neurogenesis and neural stem cells of the central nervous system in mammals. J Neurosci Res 2002; 69: 745-9.10.1002/jnr.1037812205667]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Galli R, Gritti A, Bonfanti L, Vescovi AL. Neural stem cells: an overview. Circ Res 2003; 92: 598-608.10.1161/01.RES.0000065580.02404.F412676811]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Armesilla-Diaz A, Bragado P, Del Valle I, Cuevas E, Lazaro I, Martin C, et al. p53 regulates the self-renewal and differentiation of neural precursors. Neuroscience 2009; 158: 1378-89.10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.05219038313]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Monje ML, Mizumatsu S, Fike JR, Palmer TD. Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell dysfunction. Nat Med 2002; 8: 955-62.10.1038/nm74912161748]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Wei L-C, Ding Y-X, Liu Y-H, Duan L, Bai Y, Shi M, et al. Low-dose radiation stimulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling, neural stem cell proliferation and neurogenesis of the mouse hippocampus in vitro and in vivo. Curr Alzheimer Res 2012; 9: 278-89.10.2174/15672051280010762722272614]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Visvader JE, Stingl J, Genes D. Mammary stem cells and the differentiation hierarchy: current status and perspectives. Genes Dev 2014; 28: 1143-58.10.1101/gad.242511.114405276124888586]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Shackleton M, Vaillant F, Simpson KJ, Stingl J, Smyth GK, Asselin-Labat ML, et al. Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Nature 2006; 439: 84-8.10.1038/nature0437216397499]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, Jackson KW, Clarke MF, Kawamura MJ, et al. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev 2003; 17: 1253-70.10.1101/gad.106180319605612756227]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Cicalese A, Bonizzi G, Pasi CE, Faretta M, Ronzoni S, Giulini B, et al. The tumor suppressor p53 regulates polarity of self-renewing divisions in mammary stem cells. Cell 2014; 138: 1083-95.10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.04819766563]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Ziyaie D, Hupp TR, Thompson AM. P53 and breast cancer. Breast 2000; 9: 239-46.10.1054/brst.2000.019914732173]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Insinga a, Cicalese a, Faretta M, Gallo B, Albano L, Ronzoni S, et al. DNA damage in stem cells activates p21, inhibits p53, and induces symmetric self-renewing divisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 3931-6.10.1073/pnas.1213394110359390123417300]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Kondo M, Wagers AJ, Manz MG, Prohaska SS, Scherer DC, Beilhack GF, et al. Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application. Annu Rev Immunol 2003; 21: 759-806.10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.14100712615892]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Milyavsky M, Gan OI, Trottier M, Komosa M, Tabach O, Notta F, et al. A distinctive DNA damage response in human hematopoietic stem cells reveals an apoptosis-independent role for p53 in self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 2014; 7: 186-97.10.1016/j.stem.2010.05.01620619763]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Mitra K. Mitochondrial fission-fusion as an emerging key regulator of cell proliferation and differentiation. Bioessays 2013; 35: 955-64.10.1002/bies.20130001123943303]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Yakes FM, Van Houten B. Mitochondrial DNA damage is more extensive and persists longer than nuclear DNA damage in human cells following oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997; 94: 514-9.10.1073/pnas.94.2.514195449012815]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Kam WW-Y, Banati RB. Effects of ionizing radiation on mitochondria. Free Radic Biol Med 2013; 65: 607-19.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.02423892359]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Azzam EI, Jay-Gerin JP, Pain D. Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury. Cancer Lett 2012; 327: 48-60.10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.012398044422182453]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 2012; 337: 1062-5.10.1126/science.1219855476202822936770]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Nugent SME, Mothersill CE, Seymour C, McClean B, Lyng FM, Murphy JEJ. Increased mitochondrial mass in cells with functionally compromised mitochondria after exposure to both direct γ radiation and bystander factors. Radiat Res 2007; 168: 134-42.10.1667/RR0769.117722997]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Bañuelos CA, Banáth JP, MacPhail SH, Zhao J, Eaves CA, O’Connor MD, et al. Mouse but not human embryonic stem cells are deficient in rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008; 7: 1471-83.10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.05.00518602349]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Hanawalt P. Functional characterization of global genomic DNA repair and its implications for cancer. Mutat Res Mutat Res 2003; 544: 107-14.10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.06.00214644313]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Purschke M, Kasten-Pisula U, Brammer I, Dikomey E. Human and rodent cell lines showing no differences in the induction but differing in the repair kinetics of radiation-induced DNA base damage. Int J Radiat Biol 2004; 80: 29-38.10.1080/0955300031000164288514761848]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Parrinello S, Samper E, Krtolica A, Goldstein J, Melov S, Campisi J. Oxygen sensitivity severely limits the replicative lifespan of murine fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5: 741-7.10.1038/ncb1024]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Hornsby PJ. Mouse and human cells versus oxygen. Sci Aging Knowl Environ 2003; 2003: PE21.10.1126/sageke.2003.30.pe21]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Wright WE, Shay JW. Telomere dynamics in cancer progression and prevention: fundamental differences in human and mouse telomere biology. Nat Med 2000; 6: 849-51.10.1038/78592]Search in Google Scholar
[77. Hornsby PJ. Replicative senescence of human and mouse cells in culture: significance for aging research. Mech Ageing Dev 2003; 124: 853-5.10.1016/S0047-6374(03)00173-8]Search in Google Scholar