[1. Choi DH, Hwang JK, Ko YT, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010; 26: 265–73.10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.265]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Fleshman JW, Nelson H, Peters WR, Kim HC, Larach S, Boorse RR, et al. Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: S53-S58.10.1007/BF02053806]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, et al. Stapled versus hand sewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; 3: CD 003144.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. McCue JL, Phillips RK. Sutureless intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1991; 78: 1291–1296.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Hardy KJ. Non-suture anastomosis: the historical development. Aust N Z J Surg. 1990; 60: 625–633.10.1111/j.1445-2197.1990.tb07444.x]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Kaidar-Person O, Rosenthal RJ, Wexner SD, et al. Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations. Am J Sur. 2008; 195: 818–826.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.006]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Murphy JB. Classical articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Cholecysto-intestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981; 24: 51–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Kanshin NN, Lytkin MI, Knysh VI, et al. [First experience with application of compression anastomoses with the apparatus AKA-2 in operations on the large intestine]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1984; 132: 52–57.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Hardy TG, Jr., Pace WG, Maney JW, et al. A bio-fragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985; 28: 484–490.10.1007/BF02554090]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bubrick MP, Corman ML, Cahill CJ, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. The BAR Investigational Group. Am J Surg. 1991; 161: 136–142.10.1016/0002-9610(91)90374-M]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Szold A. New concepts for a compression anastomosis: superelastic clips and rings. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008; 17: 168–171.10.1080/1364570080210312618609001]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Barras CD, Myers KA. Nitinol – its use in vascular surgery and other applications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 564-569.10.1053/ejvs.2000.111110873721]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Stewart D, Hunt S, Pierce R, et al. Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (Endo CAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2007; 14: 252.10.1177/155335060731224118178912]Search in Google Scholar
[14. D’Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, et al. Circular ‘superelastic’ compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008; 17: 172–5.10.1080/1364570080210314218608997]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 653–60.10.1007/s10350-004-6627-912792443]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 15: CD003144.10.1002/14651858.CD003144.pub222336786]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, et al. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis. It’s later than you think. Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 254–8.10.1097/01.sla.0000225083.27182.85187698717245179]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kopelman D, Lelcuk S, Sayfan J, Matter I, Willenz EP, Zaidenstein L, et al. End-to-end compression anastomosis of the rectum: a pig model. World J Surg. 2007; 31: 532–537.10.1007/s00268-006-0221-317334866]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Starcher B, Fleshman J. Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2007; 14: 252–260.10.1177/155335060731224118178912]Search in Google Scholar
[20. D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L. Circular ‘superelastic’ compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008; 17: 172–175.10.1080/1364570080210314218608997]Search in Google Scholar
[21. D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L. Circular ‘superelastic’ compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008; 17: 172–175.10.1080/13645700802103142]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Masoomi H, Luo R, Mills S, Carmichael J, Senagore A, Stamos M. Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients. The American Journal of Surgery. 2013; 205: 447–45110.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.03.01323290352]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Song C, Frank T, Cuschieri A. Shape memory alloy clip for compression colonic anastomosis. J Biomech Eng. 2005; 127: 351–4.10.1115/1.187119515971714]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Thiede A, Geiger D, Dietz UA, et al. Overview on compression anastomoses: biofragmentable anastomosis ring multicenter prospective trial of 1666 anastomoses. World J Surg. 1998; 22: 78–86; discussion 87.10.1007/s0026899003539465766]Search in Google Scholar