Effective and organ doses from common CT examinations in one general hospital in Tehran, Iran

[1] Durand DJ, Mahesh M. Understanding CT dose display. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9(9):669-671.10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.00322954552Search in Google Scholar

[2] Saltybaeva N, Jafari ME, Hupfer M, Kalender WA. Estimates of effective dose for CT scans of the lower extremities. Radiology. 2014;273(1):153-159.10.1148/radiol.1413290324937693Search in Google Scholar

[3] Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: Sex-and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology. 2010;257(1):158-166.10.1148/radiol.1010004720851940Search in Google Scholar

[4] Haddadi G, Mehdizadeh S, Haddadi MB, Meshkibaf MH. Evaluation of Absorbed Dose of Critical Organ in Rando Phantom under Head, Abdomen and Pelvis Spiral CT Scan by Thermo Luminescent Dosimetery - TLD. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2011;1(3):131-135.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Zarb F, McEntee M, Rainford L. Maltese CT doses for commonly performed examinations demonstrate alignment with published DRLs across Europe. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;150(2):198-206.10.1093/rpd/ncr39321993803Search in Google Scholar

[6] Shrimpton P, Hillier M, Lewis M, Dunn M. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK-2003 review: National Radiological Protection Board. Chilton, UK; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hart D, Wall B, Hillier M, Shrimpton P. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental x-ray examination in the UK, 2008: Health Protection Agency. Chilton, UK; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[8] van der Molen AJ, Schilham A, Stoop P, et al. A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(3):383-390.2367345510.1007/s13244-013-0253-9367525523673455Search in Google Scholar

[9] ICRP Publication 103, Valentin J. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection: Elsevier Oxford; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Friberg EG, Widmark A, Hauge IHR. National collection of local diagnostic reference levels in Norway and their role in optimization of X-ray examinations. Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Osteras, Norway. 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun F, et al. Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;142(2-4):244-254.10.1093/rpd/ncq27920926508Search in Google Scholar

[12] Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-2284.10.1056/NEJMra07214918046031Search in Google Scholar

[13] Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Rainford L. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. Br J Radiol. 2014;85(1018):1390-1397.10.1259/bjr/15839549347402222595497Search in Google Scholar

[14] Saravanakumar A, Vaideki K, Govindarajan K, Jayakumar S. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography for select procedures in Pudhuchery, India. J Med Phys/Association of Medical Physicists of India. 2014;39(1):50-55.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Matsunaga Y, Kawaguchi A, Kobayashi K, et al. Effective radiation doses of CT examinations in Japan: a nationwide questionnaire-based study. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1058):20150671.10.1259/bjr.20150671498521426647804Search in Google Scholar

[16] Somatom Emotion Technical Specifications. available at: http://www.healthcare.siemens.com/.Search in Google Scholar

[17] CT systems and hardware. 2002. available at: http://www.impactscan.org/.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Pantos I, Thalassinou S, Argentos S, et al. Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1000):293-303.10.1259/bjr/69070614347346421266399Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hsieh J, Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances, 2009: SPIE Bellingham, WA.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Mutic S, Palta JR, Butker EK, et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66. Med Phys. 2003;30(10):2762-92.10.1118/1.160927114596315Search in Google Scholar

[21] Yates SJ, Pike LC, Goldstone KE. Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(918):472-478.10.1259/bjr/2192725815151967Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ngaile JE, Msaki P. Estimation of Patient Organ Doses from Computed Tomography Examinations in Tanzania. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006;7(3):80-94.10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2200572243217533338Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Lee E, Lamart S, Little MP, Lee C. Database of normalised computed tomography dose index for retrospective CT dosimetry. J Radiol Prot. 2014;34(2):363-388.10.1088/0952-4746/34/2/36324727361Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Stamm G, Nagel HD. [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT]. RoFo: Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2002;174(12):1570-1576.10.1055/s-2002-3593712471531Search in Google Scholar

[25] ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Elsevier Health Sciences; 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Shrimpton MCH, Meeson S, Golding SJ. Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the UK – 2011 Review.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Palorini F, Origgi D, Granata C, et al. Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(2):469-483.10.1007/s00330-013-3031-724121713Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Muhogora W, Nyanda A, Ngoye W, Shao D. Radiation doses to patients during selected CT procedures at four hospitals in Tanzania. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57(3):461-467.10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.08.00316165335Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Hiles PA, Brennen SE, Scott SA, Davies JH. A survey of patient dose and image quality for computed tomography scanners in Wales. J Radiol Prot. 2001;21(4):345.10.1088/0952-4746/21/4/30211787889Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating Effective Dose for CT Using Dose–Length Product Compared With Using Organ Doses: Consequences of Adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 or Dual-Energy Scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):881-889.10.2214/AJR.09.346220308486Search in Google Scholar