Accesso libero

Precedence permutation patterns creating criticality constellations: Exploring a conjecture on nonlinear activities with continuous links

 e    | 17 feb 2018
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Allen, J. F. (1983). Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of ACM, 26(11), pp. 832-843.10.1145/182.358434Search in Google Scholar

Awwad, R. E., & Ioannou, P. G. (2007). Floats in RSM: Repetitive scheduling method. In: Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, Grand Bahama Island, The Commonwealth of the Bahamas, May 6-8, 2007, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp. 1133-1140.Search in Google Scholar

Bokor, O., & Hajdu, M. (2015). Investigation of critical activities in a network with point-to-point relations. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 198-207.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.078Search in Google Scholar

Crandall, K. C. (1973). Project planning with precedence lead/lag factors. Project Management Quarterly, 4(3), PMI-18-PMI-27.Search in Google Scholar

Fazar, W. (1962). The origin of PERT. The Controller, 1962(December), pp. 598-621.Search in Google Scholar

Fondahl, J. W. (1962). A Non-Computer Approach to the Critical Path Method for the Construction Industry, 2nd ed., November 1961, Revised 1962, Technical Report No. 9, Prepared under research contract NBy-17798, Bureau of Yards and Docks, U.S. Navy, Distributed by The Construction Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 133 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, A. (2004). La modélisation chronographique de la planification des projets de construction. Dissertation, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada, 331 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M. (1997). Network Scheduling Techniques for Construction Project Management. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-1-4757-5951-8Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M. (2015a). Continuous precedence relations for better modelling overlapping activities. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 216-223.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.080Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M. (2015b). History and some latest developments of precedence diagramming method. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 7(2), pp. 1302-1314.10.5592/otmcj.2015.2.5Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M. (2015c). One relation to rule them all: The point-to-point precedence relation that substitutes the existing ones. In: Proceedings of the CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 8-10, 2015, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montréal, QC, Canada, pp. 827-837.Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M. (2016). How many types of critical activities exist? A conjecture that needs a proof. In: Presentation, Creative Construction Conference, Budapest, Hungary, June 25-28, 2016, Diamond Congress, Budapest, Hungary.Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M., Lucko, G., & Su, Y. (2017). Singularity functions for continuous precedence relations and nonlinear activity-time-production functions. Automation in Construction, 79(July), pp. 31-38.10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.012Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M., Skibniewski, M. J., Vanhoucke, M., Horvath, A., & Brilakis, I. (2016). How many types of critical activities exist? A conjecture that needs a proof.” Procedia Engineering, 164, pp. 3-11.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.585Search in Google Scholar

Harmelink, D. J. (2001). Linear scheduling model: Float characteristics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(4), pp. 255-260.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(255)Search in Google Scholar

Harris, R. B. (1978). Precedence and Arrow Networking Techniques for Construction. John Wiley and Sons, New York City, NY.Search in Google Scholar

IBM. (1964). User’s Manual for IBM 1440 Project Control System (PCS). International Business Machines, Armonk, NY.Search in Google Scholar

Kallantzis, A., & Lambropoulos, S. (2004). Critical path determination by incorporation minimum and maximum time and distance constraints into linear scheduling. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(3), pp. 211-222.10.1108/09699980410535813Search in Google Scholar

Kelley, J. W., & Walker, M. R. (1959). Critical path planning and scheduling. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, Boston, MA, December 1-3, 1959, National Joint Computer Committee, Association for Computing Machinery, New York City, NY, 16, pp. 160-173.10.1145/1460299.1460318Search in Google Scholar

Kelley, J. W., & Walker, M. R. (1989). The origins of CPM: A personal history. pmNetwork, 3(2), pp. 7-22.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S.-Y. (2012). CPM schedule summarizing function of the beeline diagramming method. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 11(2), pp. 367-374.10.3130/jaabe.11.367Search in Google Scholar

Lucko, G. (2008). Analysis of linear schedules with singularity functions versus critical path method. In: Presented at PMI College of Scheduling Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, May 4-7, 2008, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, 12 pp.10.1109/WSC.2008.4736361Search in Google Scholar

Lucko, G. (2009). Productivity scheduling method: Linear schedule analysis with singularity functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(4), pp. 246-253.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:4(246)Search in Google Scholar

Lucko, G., & Gattei, G. (2016). Line-of-balance against linear scheduling: Critical comparison. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 169(1), pp. 26-44.10.1680/jmapl.15.00016Search in Google Scholar

Lucko, G., & Peña Orozco, A. A. (2009). Float types in linear schedule analysis with singularity functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(5), pp. 368-37710.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000007Search in Google Scholar

Mauchly, J. W. (1962). Critical-path scheduling. Chemical Engineering, April 16, pp. 139-154.Search in Google Scholar

Mubarak, S. A. (2015). Construction Project Scheduling and Control, 3rd edn. Pearson/Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Search in Google Scholar

Plotnick, F. L. (2006). RDM - relationship diagramming method. In: Transactions of the AACE Annual Meeting, Last Vegas, NV, June 19-22, 2006, Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International, Morgantown, WV, PS.08.1- PS.08.10.Search in Google Scholar

Ponce de Leon, G. (2008). Graphical planning method (A new network-based planning/scheduling paradigm). In: Presented at PMI College of Scheduling Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, May 4-7, 2008, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, 10 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Reis, J. S., & Lucko, G. (2016). Productivity scheduling method with maximum constraints. International Journal of Construction Management, 16(1), pp. 77-93.10.1080/15623599.2015.1130674Search in Google Scholar

Rösch, W. (1970). Roy-Typ und Fondahl-Typ: Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Tätigkeitsgraphen in Bauwesen. Dissertation, Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina of Brunswick, Brunswick, Germany, 144 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Roy, G. B. (1959). Contribution de la théorie des graphes á l’étude de certains problémes linéaries. Comptes Rendus de Séance de l’Académie des Sciences, 248(April 27, 1959), pp. 2437-2439.Search in Google Scholar

Wiest, J. D. (1981). Precedence diagramming method: Some unusual characteristics and their implications for project managers. Journal of Operations Management, 1(3), pp. 121-130.10.1016/0272-6963(81)90015-2Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1847-6228
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, other