Morphological classification of conspecific birds from closely situated breeding areas – A case study of the Common Nightingale

Agrawal, A. A. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. – Science 294: 321–326. DOI: 10.1126/science.106070110.1126/science.106070111598291Search in Google Scholar

Amrhein, V., Kunc, H. P. & Naguib, M. 2004. Seasonal patterns of singing activity vary with time of day in the Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). – The Auk 121: 110–117. DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0110:SPOSAV]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Ács, Z. & Kováts, D. 2013. Phylogenetic patterns of a nightingale population in a contact zone of Luscinia megarhynchos and L. luscinia in Hungary. – North-Western Journal of Zoology 9(2): 365–373.Search in Google Scholar

Berggren, Å. & Low, M. 2006. Sexual dichromatism in North Island Robins (Petroica longipes) is weakened by delayed plumage maturation in males and females. – Emu 106(3): 203–209. DOI: 10.1071/MU0505710.1071/MU05057Search in Google Scholar

Breiman, L. 2001. Random Forests. – Machine Learning 45(1): 5–32. DOI: 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324Search in Google Scholar

Busse, P. 1967. Application of the numerical indexes of the wing-shape. – Notatki Ornitologiczne 8(1): 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Busse, P. 2000. Bird Station Manual. SE European Bird Migration Network. – University of Gdańsk, pp. 264Search in Google Scholar

Cramp, S. 1988. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 5. – Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1063Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, D. R., Edwards, C. T., Beard, H. K., Cutler, A., Hess, T. K., Gibson, C. J. & Lawler, C. J. 2007. Random Forest for classification in ecology. – Ecology 88(11): 2783–2792. DOI: 10.1890/07-0539.110.1890/07-0539.118051647Search in Google Scholar

De’ath, G. & Fabricius, E. K. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. – Ecology 81: 3178–3192. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[5B3178:CARTAP]5D2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Grant, P. R. 1999. The ecology and evolution of Darwin’s Finches. – Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 492Search in Google Scholar

Hołynski, R. 1965. Methods for the analysis of the wing shape of birds. – Notatki Ornithologiczne 6: 21–25.Search in Google Scholar

Hothorn, T., Buehlmann, P., Dudoit, S., Molinaro, A. & Van Der Laan, M. 2006a Survival Ensembles. – Biostatistics 7(3): 355–373. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj01110.1093/biostatistics/kxj01116344280Search in Google Scholar

Hothorn, T., Hornik, K. & Zeileis, A. 2006b Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. – Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3): 651–674. DOI: 10.1198/106186006X13393310.1198/106186006X133933Search in Google Scholar

Illera, J. C., Richardson, D. S., Helm, B., Atienza, J. C. & Emerson, B. C. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography and speciation in the avian genus Saxicola. – Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48: 1145–1154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.01610.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.01618571939Search in Google Scholar

Kováts, D., Végvári, Zs. & Varga, Z. 2013. Morphological patterns of a nightingale population in a contact zone of Luscinia megarhynchos and L. luscinia. – Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 59(2): 157–170.Search in Google Scholar

Lara, C. E., Cuervo, A. M., Valderrama, S. V., Calderón-F, D. & Cadena, C. D. 2012. A new species of wren (Troglodytidae: Thryophilus) from the dry Cauca River canyon, Northwestern Colombia. – The Auk 129(3): 537–550. DOI: 10.1525/auk.2012.1202810.1525/auk.2012.12028Search in Google Scholar

Leisler, B., Heidrich, P., Schulze-Hagen, K. & Wink, M. 1997. Taxonomy and phylogeny of reed warblers (genus Acrocephalus) based on mtDNA sequences and morphology. – Journal of Ornithology 138: 469–496. DOI: 10.1007/BF0165138110.1007/BF01651381Search in Google Scholar

Lille, R. 1988. Species-specific song and mixed singing of Nightingale and Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos, L. luscinia). – Journal of Ornithology 129: 133–159.Search in Google Scholar

Manly, B. 1986. Multivariate Statistical Methods: a Primer. – Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 159Search in Google Scholar

Päckert, M., Martens, J., Tietze, T. D., Dietzen, C., Wink, M. & Kvist, L. 2007. Calibration of a molecular clock in tits (Paridae) – Do nucleotid substitution rates of mitochondrial genes deviate from the 2% rule? – Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 44(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.00610.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.00617512759Search in Google Scholar

Pfennig, D. W., Wund, M. A., Snell-Rood, E. C., Cruickshank, T., Schlichting, C. D. & Moczek, A. P. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. – Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 459–467. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.05.00610.1016/j.tree.2010.05.00620557976Search in Google Scholar

Prinzie, A. & Van-Den Poel, D. 2008. Random Forests for multiclass classification: Random MultiNomial Logit. – Expert Systems with Applications 34(3): 1721–1732. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.02910.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.029Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Sibley, C. G. & Monroe, B. L. 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. – Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 1111Search in Google Scholar

Sorjonen, J. 1986. Mixed singing and interspecific territoriality: consequences of secondary contact of two ecologically and morphologically similar nightingale species in Europe. – Ornis Scandinavica 17: 53–67.10.2307/3676753Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A-L., Zeileis, A. & Hothorn, T. 2007. Bias in Random Forest Variable Importance Measures: Illustrations, Sources and a Solution. – BMC Bioinformatics 8: 25. pp. 21, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-2510.1186/1471-2105-8-25179690317254353Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, C., Anne-Laure, B., Thomas, K., Thomas, A. & Achim, Z. 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. – BMC Bioinformatics 9: 307. pp. 11, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-30710.1186/1471-2105-9-307249163518620558Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, C., Malley, J. & Tutz, G. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. – Psychol Methods 14(4): 323–348. DOI: 10.1037/a001697310.1037/a0016973292798219968396Search in Google Scholar

Svensson, L. 1992. Identification guide to European Passerines. 4^th ed. – Stockholm, pp. 368Search in Google Scholar

Tellería, J. L. & Carbonell, R. 1999. Morphometric variation of five Iberian Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla populations. – Journal of Avian Biology 30: 63–71. DOI: 10.2307/367724410.2307/3677244Search in Google Scholar

Reifová, R., Reif, J., Antczak, M. & Nachman, M. W. 2011. Ecological character displacement in the face of gene flow: Evidence from two species of nightingales. – BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 138. pp. 11, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-13810.1186/1471-2148-11-138312162621609448Search in Google Scholar

Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4^th ed. – Springer, New York, pp. 49510.1007/978-0-387-21706-2Search in Google Scholar

Watson, D. M. 2005. Diagnosable versus distinct: Evaluating species limits in birds. – Bioscience 55: 60–68. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)05Search in Google Scholar