<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> Website history can be considered an emerging discipline at the intersection between media history and Internet history. In this discipline, the individual website is regarded as the unifying entity of the historical analysis rather than the Internet or the Web. Writing the history of a website involves using many sources and methods similar to those used in writing the history of any other media type. But one document type requires special attention: the archived website. This is so because the problems involved in finding, collecting and preserving the website are different from those characterizing the archiving of other types of traces of human activity, including other media types. The primary problem is that the actual act of finding, collecting and preserving changes the website that was on the live web in a number of ways, thus creating a unique version of it and not simply a copy. The present article sets out, first, to discuss to what extent the archived website can be considered a new type of historical document and how its characteristics affect the task of the website historian who must later use it; second, the article discusses and attempts to formulate some methodological principles, rules and recommendations for a future critical textual philology of the website.</p></abstract>

Website history can be considered an emerging discipline at the intersection between media history and Internet history. In this discipline, the individual website is regarded as the unifying entity of the historical analysis rather than the Internet or the Web. Writing the history of a website involves using many sources and methods similar to those used in writing the history of any other media type. But one document type requires special attention: the archived website. This is so because the problems involved in finding, collecting and preserving the website are different from those characterizing the archiving of other types of traces of human activity, including other media types. The primary problem is that the actual act of finding, collecting and preserving changes the website that was on the live web in a number of ways, thus creating a unique version of it and not simply a copy. The present article sets out, first, to discuss to what extent the archived website can be considered a new type of historical document and how its characteristics affect the task of the website historian who must later use it; second, the article discusses and attempts to formulate some methodological principles, rules and recommendations for a future critical textual philology of the website.

The Archived Website and Website Philology

Nordicom Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

A New Type of Historical Document?

Website history can be considered an emerging discipline at the intersection between media history and Internet history. In this discipline, the individual...

The Archived Website and Website Philology

Pubblicato online: 14 feb 2017

Pagine: 155 - 175

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0183

Parole chiave
internet, web, website, media history, archiving, archive, philology

© by Niels Brügger

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

The Archived Website and Website Philology

Pubblicato online: 14 feb 2017

Pagine: 155 - 175

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0183

Parole chiaveinternet, web, website, media history, archiving, archive, philology

© by Niels Brügger

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Parole chiave
internet, web, website, media history, archiving, archive, philology