Civil-Service Reforms and Communist Legacy: The Case of Slovakia

Ekiert, G. and S. E. Hanson. 2003. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, K. H. and H. Wollman. 2001. “Governmentalizing Central Executives in Post-Communist Europe: A Four Country Comparison.” Journal of European Public Policy 8(6), 864–887.Search in Google Scholar

Láštic, E. 2010. “Can’t Have it Both Ways? Administrative Capacity of European Affairs.” In D. Malová et al. (eds). From Listening to Action? New Member States in the European Union. Bratislava: FiFUK, pp 145–166.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2004. “Civil Service Reform in Post-Communist Europe: The Bumpy Road to Depoliticisation.” West European Politics 27(1), 71–103.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2009a. “Varieties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Legacy Explanations of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 753), 509–528.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2009b. The Sustainability of Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years after Accession. SIGMA Paper 44. Paris: OECD Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. H. and K. Yesilkagit. 2011. “Differential Legacy Effects: Three Propositions on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Public Administration Reform in Europe East and West.” Journal of European Public Policy 18(2), 311–322.Search in Google Scholar

Nunberg, B. 1999. The State after Communism: Administrative Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.10.1596/0-8213-4205-3Search in Google Scholar

Painter, M. and B. G. Peters (eds). 2010. Administrative Traditions: Inheritences and Transplants in Comparative Perspective. Basingtone: Palgrave.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, G. and J. Pierre (eds). 2004. Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203799857Search in Google Scholar

Peters, G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science. The New Institutionalism. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Rauch, J. E. and P. B. Evans. 2000. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75, 49–71.Search in Google Scholar

Sigma. 1998. Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space. SIGMA Paper 23. Paris: SIGMA.Search in Google Scholar

Staroňová, K. 2014. “Innovative Elements in Civil Service Reform of Slovakia.” Paper Presented at the 21^st NISPAcee Annual Conference 2013, Regionalisation and Inter-regional Cooperation, Belgrade, 16–18 May 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Staroňová, K. and G. Gajduschek. 2013. “Civil Service Reform in Slovakia and Hungary: The Road to Professionalisation.” In C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker and L. Verhey (eds). Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance. London: Palgrave, 123–151.Search in Google Scholar

Staroňová, K. and E. Láštic. 2011. “Regulácia politicko-administratívnych vzťahov na Slovensku v rokoch 1990–2010” [Regulation of politico-administrative relation in Slovakia 1990–2010]. In M. Beblavý, E. Beblavá et al. (eds). Koaličná zmluva či zákon? Právna úprava a realita politicko-administratívnych vzťahov na Slovensku. Prešov: Michal Vaško, 33–83.Search in Google Scholar

Staroňová, K. and E. Láštic. 2012. “Into the Labyrinth: The Rewards for High Public Office in Slovakia.” In: B. G. Peters and M. Brans (eds). Rewards for High Public Office in Europe and North America. London: Routledge, 248–268.Search in Google Scholar

Verheijen, T. (ed.). 1999. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Verheijen, T. (ed.). 2001. Politico-administrative Relations: Who Rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee.Search in Google Scholar

Verheijen, T. 2010. “The New Member States of the European Union: Constructed and Historical Traditions and Reform Trajectories.” In: M. Painter, G. Peters (eds). Tradition and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillian, Pp. 217–233.Search in Google Scholar

World Bank. 2007. EU-8: Administrative Capacity in the New Member States: The Limits of Innovation? Washington, DC: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

• Effectiveness of Administrative Appeal in Slovenia and Croatia – Between National Traditions and EU Standards

• Usability of Municipal Performance-based Budgets within Strategic Planning in Slovakia: Perception of Elected Local Representatives

• Municipal Solid Waste Management in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia

• The Impact of Trust in Government – Young Voters’ Behavioral Intention to Use I-voting in Slovenia

• Multiple Streams Framework as Scientific Research Program and Tool for the Analysis of Public Policy Issues

• Citizens’ Attitudes to Nudges in the Maintenance of Public Spaces and Waste Management

• Impact of Qualification and Working Conditions on Civil Servant Pay Levels in Russia

• Implementation of Sustainable Public Procurement in the Rail Transport in the Czech Republic and a Comparison with the Other Members of the Visegrad Group

• The Effect of Academic Discipline on Policy Attitudes: The Case of Czech University Students

• Editorial: COVID-19 Pandemics and Politics