[1. Albertina Database. (2014). Databáze firem a institucí ALBERTINA CZ Gold Edition. Praha: Bisnode. Retrieved from DVD database.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bučar, M., Jaklič, A., & Stare, M. (2010). Innovation potential of public and private sectors' cooperation in knowledge-intensive services in Slovenia. Naše gospodarstvo, 56(5–6), 29–35.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Pellitero, M. M., & Baumert, T. (2006). Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case. Technovation, 26(4), 463–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.007]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Cooke, P. (2004). Introduction: Regional innovation systems—an evolutionary approach. In P. N. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, & H. J. Braczyk (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world (pp. 1–18). London and New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: Regional perspectives on global competitiveness. London and New York: Pinter.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. CZSO. (2013a). Statistické ročenky krajů 2013. Retrieved from www.czso.cz]Search in Google Scholar
[9. CZSO. (2013b). Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje podle krajů České republiky 2005–2012. Retrieved from www.czso.cz]Search in Google Scholar
[10. CZSO. (2014). Inovační aktivity podniků v ČR—2010 až 2012. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Dautel, V., & Walther, O. (2014). The geography of innovation in a small metropolitan region: An intra-regional approach in Luxembourg. Papers in Regional Science, 93(4), 703–725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12019]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24(3), 243–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (1999). Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in Society, 21(1), 63–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00037-2]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Fischer, M. M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2), 199–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy? Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 101–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kaufmann, A. (2007). Patterns of innovation relations in metropolitan regions: the case of the Vienna urban region. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(3), 735–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0119-5]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Klímová, V., & Žítek, V. (2015). Inovační paradox v Česku: Ekonomická teorie a politická realita. Politická Ekonomie, 2015(2), 147–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.994]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Kutscherauer, A., Fachinelli, H., Hučka, M., Skokan, K., Sucháček, J., Tománek, P., & Tuleja, P. (2010). Regionální disparity v územním rozvoji České republiky—jejich vznik, identifikace a eliminace. Ostrava: VSB-Technical University Ostrava.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. Globelics Academy. Retrieved from www.globelicsacademy.net]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Lundvall, B. A. (2010). National systems of innovation. Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Anthem Press.10.7135/UPO9781843318903]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Mavrič, J., Tominc, P., & Bobek, V. (2014). Qualitative indicators for measuring the performance development of selected cities. Naše Gospodarstvo, 60(3–4), 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7549/ourecon.2014.3-4.02]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Melecký, L., & Staníčková, M. (2011). Hodnocení konkurenceschopnosti regionů České republiky v kontextu Lisabonské strategie. Ekonomická Revue, 14(3), 183–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.7327/cerei.2011.09.04]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Metcalfe, S., & Ramlogan, R. (2008). Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(2), 433–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy, 31(8), 1467–1479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00076-8]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Poledníková, E., & Lelková, P. (2012). Evaluation of regional disparities in Visegrad four countries, Germany and Austria using the cluster analysis. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.) 15th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences (pp. 36–47). Brno: Masaryk University.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Tijssen, R. J. W. (1998). Quantitative assessment of large heterogeneous R&D networks: The case of process engineering in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 26(7–8), 791–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00060-7]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Tödtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation systems in regions of Europe—A comparative perspective. European Planning Studies, 7(6), 699–717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720549]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Tödtling, F., Skokan, K., Höglinger, C., Rumpel, P., & Grillitsch, M. (2013). Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: comparing software firms in Moravia-Silesia and Upper Austria. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 188–205.10.1177/0969776411428498]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Trippl, M., Asheim, B., & Miorner, J. (2015). Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems. Lund University Working Paper 2015(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969776411428498]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Viturka, M., Halámek, P., Klímová, V., Tonev, P., & Žítek, V. (2010). Kvalita podnikatelského prostředí, regionální konkurenceschopnost a strategie regionálního rozvoje České republiky. Praha: Grada publishing.]Search in Google Scholar