[European Social Survey (ESS). 2014. European Social Survey Round 7 Data. Data file edition 1.0. Norway: Norwegian Social Science Data Services. Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Social Survey (ESS). 2011. Round 6 Specification for Participating Countries. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London. Available at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round6/methods/ESS6_project_specification.pdf (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society 169(3): 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jans, M., R. Sirkis, and D. Morgan. 2013. “Managing Data Quality Indicators with Paradata based Statistical Quality Control Tools: the Keys to Survey Performance.” In Improving Surveys with Paradata. Analytic Uses of Process Information, edited by Frauke Kreuter, 191–229. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118596869.ch9]Search in Google Scholar
[Juran, J.M. and F.M. Gryna. 1988. Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirgis, N.G. and J.M. Lepkowski. 2013. “Design and Management Strategies for Paradata-driven Response Design: Illustration from the 2006–2010 National Design of Family Growth.” In Improving Surveys with Paradata. Analytic Uses of Process Information, edited by Frauke Kreuter, 191–229. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118596869.ch6]Search in Google Scholar
[Kohler, U. 2007. “Surveys from inside: An Assessment of Unit Nonresponse Bias with Internal Criteria.” Survey Research Methods 1(2): 55–67. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2007.v1i2.75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F., M. Couper, and L. Lyberg. 2010. “The Use of Paradata to Monitor and Manage Survey Data Collection.” In Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association, 282–296. Vancouver: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2010/Files/306107_55863.pdf (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Laflamme, F., M. Maydan, and A. Miller. 2008. “Using Paradata to Actively Manage Data Collection Survey Process.” In Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association, 630–637. Denver: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2008/Files/300608.pdf (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Laflamme, F. 2009. “Data Collection Research Using Paradata at Statistics Canada.” In Proceeding of Statistics Canada’s International Symposium Series. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-522-x/2008000/article/10997-eng.pdf (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored Fieldwork Design to Increase Representative Household Survey Response: An Experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society 176(1): 169–189. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundquist, P. and C.-E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29(4): 557–582. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040]Search in Google Scholar
[Malter, F. 2013. “Fieldwork Monitoring in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1–8. http://surveyinsights.org/?p=1974. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2014-00006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matsuo, H. and G. Loosveldt. 2013. Report on quality assessment of contact data files in Round 5: Final report 27 countries. Leuven: European Social Survey, University of Leuven. Available at: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round5/methods/ESS5_response_based_quality_assessment_e01.pdf (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Peytchev, A., S. Riley, J. Rosen, J. Murphy, and M. Lindblad. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias in Surveys through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4(1): 21–29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.3037.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, O. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, K. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response through R-Indicators and Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review 80(3): 382–399. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Article Optimizing Quality of Response through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39(1): 29–58. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-001-x/2013001/article/11824-eng.pdf (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2015. “Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review, Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12159.10.1111/insr.12159]Search in Google Scholar
[Shewart, W.A. 1931. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured products. Princeton, New Jersey: van Nostrand Reinhold Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shewart, W.A. 1939. Statistical Methods from the View Point of Quality control. Washington: The Graduate School, the department of Agriculture.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vandenplas, C., G. Loosveldt, and K. Beullens. 2015. “Better or Longer? The Evolution of Weekly Number of Completed Interviews over the Fieldwork Period in the European Social Survey.” Paper presented at the Nonresponse Workshop, Leuven 2015. Available at: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/521789 (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vandenplas, C. and G. Loosveldt. 2017. “Modeling the Evolution of Fieldwork in Terms of Quality Indicators: Six Rounds of the European Social Survey.” Journal of Statistics and Methodolgy 5(2): 212–232. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw034.10.1093/jssam/smw034]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Michigan. Available at: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/60831/jameswag_1.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed March 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, L.C., I.B. Thomsen, and O. Kleven. 2013. “On the Use of Auxiliary and Paradata for Dealing with Non-Sampling Errors in Household Surveys.” International Statistical Review 81(2): 270–288. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12009.10.1111/insr.12009]Search in Google Scholar