[American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). 2003. Interviewer Falsification in Survey Research: Current Best Methods for Prevention, Detection, and Repair of its Effects. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/falsification.pdf (accessed April 6th, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethmann, A. and D. Gebhardt. 2011. User Guide “Panel Study Labor Market and Social Security” (PASS) * Wave 3. FDZ Datenreport, 04/2011 (en), Nuremberg. Available at: http://doku.iab.de/fdz/reporte/2011/DR_04-11_EN.pdf (accessed April 6th, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Biemer, P.P. and S.L. Stokes. 1989. “The Optimal Design of Quality Control Samples to Detect Interviewer Cheating.” Journal of Official Statistics 5: 23–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biemer, P.P. 2010. “Overview of Design Issues: Total Survey Error.” In Handbook of Survey Research, 2nd ed., edited by P.V. Marsden and J.D. Wright, 27–58. Bingley: Emerald.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blasius, J. and J. Friedrichs. 2013. “Faked Interviews.” In Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences, edited by S. Salzborn, E. Davidov, and J. Reinecke, 49–56. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-531-18898-0_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Brashears, M.E. 2011. “Small Networks and High Isolation? A Reexamination of American Discussion Networks.” Social Networks 33: 331–341. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bredl, S., P. Winker, and K. Koetschau. 2012. “A Statistical Approach to Detect Interviewer Falsification of Survey Data.” Survey Methodology 38: 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brüderl, J., B. Huyer-May, and C. Schmiedeberg. 2013. “Interviewer Behavior and the Quality of Social Network Data.” In Interviewers’ Deviations in Surveys. Impact, Reasons, Detection and Prevention, edited by P. Winkler, R. Porst, and N. Menold, 147–160. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Büngeler, K., M. Gensicke, J. Hartmann, R. Jäckle, and N. Tschersich. 2010. IAB-Haushaltspanel im Niedrigeinkommensbereich Welle 3 (2008/09): Methoden- und Feldbericht. FDZ Methodenreport, 10/2010 (de), Nuremberg. Available at: http://doku.iab.de/fdz/reporte/2010/MR_10-10.pdf (accessed April 6th, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Campanelli, P. and C. O’Muircheartaigh. 1999. “Interviewers, Interviewer Continuity, and Panel Survey Nonresponse.” Quality & Quantity 33: 59–76. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004357711258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cleveland, W.S. 1979. “Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplot.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 829–836.10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038]Search in Google Scholar
[Cragg, J.G. 1971. “Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods.” Econometrica 39: 829–844. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1909582.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crespi, L.P. 1945. “The Cheater Problem in Polling.” Public Opinion Quarterly 9: 431–445.10.1086/265760]Search in Google Scholar
[Eckman, S., F. Kreuter, A. Jäckle, A. Kirchner, S. Presser, and R. Tourangeau. 2014. “Assessing the Mechanisms of Misreporting to Filter Questions in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78: 721–733. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu030.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, C.S. 2009. “The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact?” American Sociological Review 74: 657–669. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400408.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, J. and E.W. Butler. 1976. “Some Sources of Interviewer Variance in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 79–91. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268-269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldstein, H. 1986. “Multilevel Mixed Linear Model Analysis Using Iterative Generalized Least Squares.” Biometrika 73: 43–56. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.1.43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and N.H. Fultz. 1985. “Gender Effects among Telephone Interviewers in a Survey of Economic Attitudes.” Sociological Methods Research 14: 31–52. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124185014001002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2004. Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guterbrock, T.M. 2008. “Falsifications.” In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by P.J. Lavrakas, 267–270. Los Angeles: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huddy, L., J. Billig, J. Bracciodieta, L. Hoeffler, P.J. Moynihan, and P. Pugliani. 1997. “The Effect of Interviewer Gender on the Survey Response.” Political Behavior 19: 197–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024882714254.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, A., J. Chromy, K. Giacoletti, and D. Odom. 2002. “Impact of Interviewer Experience on Respondent Reports of Substance Use.” In Redesigning an Ongoing National Household Survey, edited by J. Gfroerer, J. Eyerman, and J. Chromy, 161–184. Washington: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kosyakova, Y., J. Skopek, and S. Eckman. 2015. “Do Interviewers Juggle Filter Questions? Evidence from a Multilevel Approach”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 27: 417–431. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu027.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F., S. McCulloch, S. Presser, and R. Tourangeau. 2011. “The Effects of Asking Filter Questions in Interleafed Versus Grouped Format.” Sociological Methods & Research 40: 88–104. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124110392342.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lechner, M. 2011. “The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-In-Difference Methods.” Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 4: 165–224.10.1561/0800000014]Search in Google Scholar
[Longford, N.T. 1993. Random Coefficient Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mangione, T.W., F.J. Fowler, and T.A. Louis. 1992. “Question Characteristics and Interviewer Effects.” Journal of Official Statistics 8: 293–307.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden, P.V. 2003. “Interviewer Effects in Measuring Network Size Using a Single Name-Generator.” Social Networks 25: 1–16. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00009-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matschinger, H., S. Bernert, and M.C. Angermeyer. 2005. “An Analysis of Interviewer Effects on Screening Questions in a Computer Assisted Personal Mental Health Interview.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 657–674.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and M.E. Brashears. 2006. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.” American Sociological Review 71: 353–375. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nübling, M., H.H. Andersen, A. Mühlbacher, J. Schupp, and G.G. Wagner. 2007. “Computation of Standard Values for Physical and Mental Health Scale Scores Using the SOEP Version of SF12v2.” Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 127: 171–182. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23645941_Computation_of_Standard_Values_for_Physical_and_Mental_Health_Scale_Scores_Using_the_SOEP_Version_of_SF12v2 (accessed April 6th, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Connell, A.A. 2006. Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Response Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412984812]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Muircheartaigh, C. and P. Campanelli. 1998. “The Relative Impact of Interviewer Effects and Sample Design Effects on Survey Precision.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 161: 63–77. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00090.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paik, A. and K. Sanchagrin. 2013. “Social Isolation in America: An Artifact.” American Sociological Review 78: 339–360. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122413482919.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinheiro, J.C. and D.M. Bates. 1995. “Approximations to the Log-Likelihood Function in the Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Model.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 4: 12–35. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1995.10474663.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinheiro, J.C. and E.C. Chao. 2006. “Efficient Laplacian and Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature Algorithms for Multilevel Generalized Linear Mixed Models.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15: 58–81. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/106186006X96962.]Search in Google Scholar
[Putnam, R.D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rabe-Hesketh, S. and A. Skrondal. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Volume II:Categorical Responses, Counts, and Survival. College Station, TX: Stata Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasbash, J. and H. Goldstein. 1994. “Efficient Analysis of Mixed Hierarchical and Cross-Classified Random Structures Using a Multilevel Model.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 19: 337–350. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986019004337.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schnell, R. 1991. “Der Einfluß gefälschter Interviews auf Survey-Ergebnisse.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 20: 25–35.10.1515/zfsoz-1991-0103]Search in Google Scholar
[Schnell, R. 2012. Survey-Interviews: Methoden standardisierter Befragungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schnell, R. and F. Kreuter. 2000. “Untersuchungen zur Ursache unterschiedlicher Ergebnisse sehr ähnlicher Viktimisierungssurveys.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 52: 96–117. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11577-000-0005-y.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schnell, R. and F. Kreuter. 2005. “Separating Interviewer and Sampling-Point Effects.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 389–410.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schraepler, J.P. and G.G. Wagner. 2005. “Characteristics and Impact of Faked Interviews in Surveys – An Analysis of Genuine Fakes in the Raw Data of SOEP.” Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 89: 7–20. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s101820500188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schuman, H. and J. Converse. 1971. “The Effects of Black and White Interviewers on Black Responses in 1968.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 44–68. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/267866.]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijders, T.A.B. and R. Bosker. 2000. Multilevel Analysis. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[StataCorp. 2011. Stata. Longitudinal-Data/Panel-Data Reference Manual. Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swamy, P.A.V.B. 1971. Statistical Inference in a Random Coefficient Model. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-80653-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R. and T. Yan. 2007. “Sensitive Questions in Surveys.” Psychological Bulletin 133: 859–883.10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.85917723033]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., F. Kreuter, and S. Eckman. 2012. “Motivated Underreporting in Screening Interviews.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 453–469. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs033.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., F. Kreuter, and S. Eckman. 2013. Motivated Misreporting: Shaping Answers to Reduce Survey Burden. In Survey Measurement: Techniques and Findings from Recent Research, edited by U. Engel, 24–41, Frankfurt: Campus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trappmann, M., S. Gundert, C. Wenzig, and D. Gebhardt. 2010. “PASS: a Household Panel Survey for Research on Unemployment and Poverty.” Schmollers Jahrbuch. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 130: 609–622 Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/schm.130.4.609.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trappmann, M., J. Beste, A. Bethmann, and G. Mü ller. 2013. “The PASS Panel Survey After Six Waves.” Journal for Labour Market Research 46: 275–281. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12651-013-0150-1.]Search in Google Scholar
[van der Zouwen, J., W. Dijkstra, and J.H. Smit. 2004. “Studying Respondent-Interviewer Interaction: The Relationship Between Interviewing Style, Interviewer Behavior, and Response Behavior.” In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by P.P. Biemer, R.M. Groves, L.E. Lyberg, N.A. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman, 419–437. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118150382.ch21]Search in Google Scholar
[van Tilburg, T.G. 1998. “Interviewer Effects in the Measurement of Personal Network Size. A Non-Experimental Study.” Sociological Methods and Research 26: 300–328. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124198026003002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vassallo, R., G.B. Durrant, and P.W.F. Smith. 2016. Separating Interviewer and Area Effects Using a Cross-Classified Multilevel Logistic Model: Simulation Findings and Implications for Survey Designs. Submitted manuscript (available from the author on request: g.durrant@southampton.ac.uk).10.1111/rssa.12206]Search in Google Scholar
[West, B.T., F. Kreuter, and U. Jaenichen. 2013. “Interviewer Effects in Face-to-Face Surveys: A Function of Sampling, Measurement Error, or Nonresponse?” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 277–297. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0023.]Search in Google Scholar