[Bal, M. 1985. Narratology. C. van Boheemen (trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Balossi, G. 2014. A Corpus Linguistic Approach to Literary Language and Characterization: Virginia Woolf’s The Waves. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.18]Search in Google Scholar
[Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narrative and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge& Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakhtin, M. 1929. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Black, E. 1993. Metaphor, simile and cognition in Golding’s The Inheritors. Language and Literature, 2(1), 37-48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E. 1997. Varieties of quotation. Mind, 106, 429-45010.1093/mind/106.423.429]Search in Google Scholar
[Chatman, S. (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764-805.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davidse, K., &Vandelanotte, L. 2011. Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 236-250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fludernik, M. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London & New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, R. 1977. Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K. 1971. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S. Chatman (ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium (pp. 330-368). New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jahn, M. 1996. Windows of focalization: Deconstructing and reconstructing a narratological concept. Style, 30(2), 241-267.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jahn, M. 1999. More aspects of focalization: Refinements and applications. In J. Pier (ed.), GRAAT: Revue des Groupes de Recherches Anglo-Américaines deL'Université François Rabelai de Tours, 21, 85-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, O. 1954. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruisinga, E. 1925. A Handbook of Present-day English. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langacker, R. W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langacker, R. W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Leech, G. N., & Short, M. 1981. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman.10.2307/1772012]Search in Google Scholar
[McHale, B. 2009. Speech representation. In P. Huhn et al. (eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp. 249-287). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110217445.434]Search in Google Scholar
[Noh, Eun-Ju. 2000. Metarepresentation: A Relevance-theory Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.69]Search in Google Scholar
[Page, N. 1973. Speech in the English Novel. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, A. 2002. The construction of fictional minds. Narrative, 10(1), 28-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, A. 2004. Fictional Minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pascal, R. 1977. The Dual Voice: Free Indirect Speech and Its Functioning in the Nineteenth-Century European Novel. Manchester: Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rimmon-Kenan, S. 1983. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Methuen.10.4324/9780203130650]Search in Google Scholar
[Simpson, P. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203312612]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanders, J., & Redeker, G. 1996. Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse. In Fauconnier, G., & E. Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp.290-317). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanders, J. 1999. Degrees of subjectivity in epistemic modals and perspective representation. In Stadler, J., & C. Eyrich (eds.), Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, 1993: Proceedings of the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 471-489.10.1515/9783110811933.471]Search in Google Scholar
[Semino, E., & Swindlehurst, K. 1996. Metaphor and mind style in Ken Kesey's One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest. Style, 30(1), 143-166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Semino, E. 2006. Blending and characters’ mental functioning in Virginia Woolf’s Lappin and Lapinova. Language and Literature, 15(1), 55-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Semino, E. 2007. Mind style 25 years on. Style, 41(2), 153-203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Short, M., Semino, E., & Culpeper, J. 1996. Using a corpus for stylistics research: speech presentation. In J. Thomas & M. Short (eds.), Using Corpora in Language Research (pp. 110-131). Harlow: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanzel, F. K. 1984. A Theory of Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, M. 1982. Proteus in quotation-Land: Mimesis and the forms of reported discourse. Poetics Today, 3, 107-156.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, J. R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vandelanotte, L. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive- Functional Approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215373]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološinov, V. 1929. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiebe, J. M. 1990. Recognizing Subjective Sentences: A Computational Analysis of Narrative Text. Ph. D. dissertation, SUNY, Baffalo. Technical Report No. 90-103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woolf, V. 1996[1927]. To the Lighthouse. London: Penguin Books Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xin, B. 2009. Quotational studies: Theories and problems. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 1: 1-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zunshine, L. 2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
