The Role of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in STEMI Patients with Normal Coronary Angiography

1. Thygesen K, Alpert J, Jaffe A, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:2551-2567.10.1093/eurheartj/ehs18422922414Search in Google Scholar

2. Steg G, James K, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569-2619.10.1093/eurheartj/ehs21522922416Search in Google Scholar

3. Gu Y, Svilaas T, Horst I, Zijlstra F. Conditions mimicking acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Neth Heart J. 2008;16:325-331.10.1007/BF03086173257076318958255Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Glatter RD. Myocardial Infarction in Patients With a Normal Cardiac Catheterization. Available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/714106Search in Google Scholar

5. Chandrasekaran B, Kurbaan A. Myocardial infarction with angiographically normal coronary arteries. J R Soc Med. 2002;95:398-400.10.1177/014107680209500805Search in Google Scholar

6. Ahmar W, Lefkovits J. Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction with angiographically normal coronary arteries: causes and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2008;128:131-133.10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.05.05317689751Search in Google Scholar

7. Pasupathy S, Tavella R, McRaeJohn S, Beltrame JS. Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries – Diagnosis And Management. European Cardiology Review. 2015;10:79-82.10.15420/ecr.2015.10.2.79615946830310430Search in Google Scholar

8. DaCosta A, Tardy B, Haouchette K, et al. Long term prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction and normal coronary angiography: Impact of inherited coagulation disorders. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91:388-393.10.1160/TH03-07-044214961169Search in Google Scholar

9. Panayi G. Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and normal invasive coronary angiography. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:78-79.10.1186/s12872-016-0254-y485536227142217Search in Google Scholar

10. Olimulder M, van Es J, Galjee M. The importance of cardiac MRI as a diagnostic tool in viral myocarditis-induced cardiomyopathy. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:481-486.10.1007/BF03086308280408120087452Search in Google Scholar

11. Sedlak T, Izadnegahdar M, Humphries K, Merz C. Sex-Specific Factors in Microvascular Angina. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:747-755.10.1016/j.cjca.2013.08.013407445424582724Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Reynolds HR, Srichai MB, Iqbal SN. Mechanisms of myocardial infarction in women without angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011;124:1414-1425.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026542361939121900087Search in Google Scholar

13. Schuijf JD1, Wijns W, Jukema JW, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2508-2514.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.08017174190Search in Google Scholar

14. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Hamm B. Non-cardiac findings on coronary computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2038-2043.10.1007/s00330-006-0570-117268800Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Andrew E. The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to assessing myocardial viability. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:1095-1102.10.1007/s12350-011-9441-5350138521882082Search in Google Scholar

16. Mahrholdt H, Klem I, Sechtem U. Cardiovascular MRI for detection of myocardial viability and ischaemia. Heart. 2007;93:122-129.10.1136/hrt.2005.071290186136517170353Search in Google Scholar

17. Filippo M, Capass R. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the assessment of patients presenting with chest pain suspected for acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:255-256.10.21037/atm.2016.06.30495872427500156Search in Google Scholar

18. Nikolaou K, Alkadhi H, Bamberg F, Leschka S, Wintersperger BJ. MRI and CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: indications and applications. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:9-24.10.1007/s13244-010-0049-0325931122347932Search in Google Scholar

19. Eckert J, Schmidt M, Magedanz A, Voigtländer T, Schmermund A. Coronary CT Angiography in Managing Atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:3740-3756.10.3390/ijms16023740434692325671814Search in Google Scholar

20. Shmilovich H, Cheng V, Tamarappoo B, et al. Vulnerable Plaque Features on Coronary CT Angiography as Markers of Inducible Regional Myocardial Hypoperfusion from Severe Coronary Artery Stenoses. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:588-595.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.128322684621862017Search in Google Scholar

21. Tarkin J, Dweck M, Evans N. Imaging Atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2016;118:750-769.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306247475646826892971Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Sakuma H. Coronary CT versus MR Angiography: The Role of MR Angiograph. Radiology. 2011;258:340-349.10.1148/radiol.1010011621273518Search in Google Scholar