[1. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. CCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1864-1894.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.00521087721]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Buth J, Disselhoff B, Sommeling C, Stam L. Color-flow duplex criteria for grading stenosis in infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14:716-726.10.1067/mva.1991.329661960803]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Sun Z, Ng KH. Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:2109-2119.10.1007/s10554-011-0006-022212661]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Sun Z, Choo GH, Ng KH. Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:495-510.10.1259/bjr/15296170347987322253353]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Sun Z. Multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: Technical developments, radiation dose and diagnostic value. World J Cardiol. 2010;2:333-343.10.4330/wjc.v2.i10.333299883221160611]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Paul JF, Abada HT. Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2028.10.1007/s00330-007-0584-317318604]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-84.10.1056/NEJMra07214918046031]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:500-507.10.1001/jama.2009.5419190314]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340-2348.10.1001/jama.2009.81419509381]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:198-224.10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001339102621723512]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Sun Z, Ng K H. Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part III: radiation risk and dose reduction. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:374-380.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. De Geer J, Sandborg M, Smedby O, Persson A. The efficacy of 2D, nonlinear noise reduction filtering in cardiac imaging: A pilot study. Acta Radiologica. 2011;52:716-722.10.1258/ar.2011.10051121852437]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: Results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:940-946.10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.01519679281]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:198-224.10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001339102621723512]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenosis: First experience. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2896-2903.10.1007/s00330-009-1618-919760229]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: Accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart. 2010;96:933-938.10.1136/hrt.2009.18910020538669]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Wagner M, Butler C, Rief M, et al. Comparison of non-gated vs. electrocardiogram-gated 64-detector-row computed tomography for integrated electroanatomic mapping in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2010;12:1090-1097.10.1093/europace/euq13520525729]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: Reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081-1086.10.1007/s00330-001-1278-x11976849]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, et al. Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings:improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:334-341.10.1007/s00330-004-2575-y15611872]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:198-224.10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME, et al. The breast: In-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT — shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology. 1997;205:853-858.10.1148/radiology.205.3.93935479393547]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP, et al. In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: Effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:407-411.10.2214/ajr.180.2.180040712540443]Search in Google Scholar
[23. DeFrance T, Dubois E, Gebow D, et al. Helical prospective ECG-gating in cardiac computed tomography: Radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26:99-107.10.1007/s10554-009-9522-619898955]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, et al. MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:S387-S390.10.2214/AJR.05.021616714613]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective EKG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081-1086.10.1007/s00330-001-1278-x11976849]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Xu L, Zhang Z. Coronary CT angiography with low radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26:17-25.10.1007/s10554-009-9576-520058080]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Starck G, Lonn L, Cederblad A, Forssell-Aronsson E, Sjostrom L, Alpsten M. A method to obtain the same levels of CT image noise for patients of various sizes, to minimize radiation dose. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:140-150.10.1259/bjr.75.890.75014011893638]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[28. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF. Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effecton image quality and iodine dose. Radiology. 2004;231:169-174.10.1148/radiol.231103019115068946]Search in Google Scholar