[Barzeley M.1992, Breaking through bureaucracy, University of California Press, Minessota]Search in Google Scholar
[Behn R. 1991, Leadership counts: lessons for public managers from the Massachusetts welfare, training, and employment program, Harvard University Press]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernhardt D. 2003, Competitive Intelligence. How to Acquire &Use Strategic Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Financial Times Management, Prentice Hall]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunn W. N. 2010, Analiza politicilor publice. O introducere, Polirom, Bucuresti]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunn W.N, Hisschenmoller M 1998, The knowledge, power and participation in environment policy analysis, Transaction Publishers Publishing House]Search in Google Scholar
[Drucker, F.P. 2010, The Essential Drucker, Editura Meteor Press, Bucuresti]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, F 1993, Citizen Participation and the democratization of policy expertise. From theoretical inquiry to practical cases, Policy sciences 1993, vol26, pag165-187.10.1007/BF00999715]Search in Google Scholar
[Guichard, J.P. 2008, Challenges of Economic Sciences in the 21th Century. Institute of Economic Sciences of Serbia]Search in Google Scholar
[Heclo, H. 1977, A government of strategies: Executive Policies in Washington, Brookings Institution Press]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, S.R.;Norton, D.P. 2004, Measuring the Strategic Readiness of Intangible Assets, Harvard Business Review]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelman, S. 1987, Making public policy: A hopeful view of American Government, Basic Books]Search in Google Scholar
[Von Korgh, G. 2000, Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation, Oxford Reprints, Oxford University Press]Search in Google Scholar
[Liebowitz, J. 2006, Strategic Intelligence: business intelligence, competitive intelligence and knowledge management, Auerbach Publications, Taylor and Francis Group10.1201/9781420013900]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, L. 2004, Managementul public, ca artă, ştiinţă şi profesie,Asociatia Editoriala Noi, Chisinau]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, L. 2008, What is a Neo Weberian State?, Reflections on a concept and its implications, Univ. Chicago, available on http://iss.fsv.cuni.cz/ISS-50-version1-080227_TED1_Lynn_Whats_neoweberian_state.pdf, accessed in November 2014]Search in Google Scholar
[Meier, K., Bohte, J. 1986, Politics and bureaucracy, Cengage Learning US North, D. 1991, Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol 5. No1. Winter. Pages 97-11210.1257/jep.5.1.97]Search in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. 1995, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollitt, C. 2005, Performance management in practice. Journal of public administration research, 29 June 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, M. 1998, Versenystrategia, Akademia Kiado Publishing House]Search in Google Scholar
[Schein, E. 2010, Organizational Culture and Leadership, John Wiley and Sons Publishing House]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. 1990, Behavioural assumptions of policy tools. Journal of politics 52:2:1010.2307/2131904]Search in Google Scholar
[Senge, P. 2012, The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization, Doubleday, New York]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. 1950, Public Administration, New York]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldo, D. 1948, The Administrative State. New York, The Ronald Press Company. Accessed on https://archive.org/details/administrativest030066mbp]Search in Google Scholar
[Woodrow, W. 1887, The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, accessed on http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-study-ofadministration/ ]Search in Google Scholar