Intracoronary Imaging and Plaque Vulnerability

1. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1282-1292. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179739.10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.17973920554950Search in Google Scholar

2. Stone GW1, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226-235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.10.1056/NEJMoa100235821247313Search in Google Scholar

3. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014;114:1852-1866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.30272124902970Search in Google Scholar

4. Tian J, Ren X, Vergallo R, et al. Distinct morphological features of ruptured culprit plaque for acute coronary events compared to those with silent rupture and thin-cap fibroatheroma: a combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2209-2216. http://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.14.13760.10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.06124632266Search in Google Scholar

5. Nighoghossian N1, Derex L, Douek P. The vulnerable carotid artery plaque: current imaging methods and new perspectives. Stroke. 2005;36:2764-2772. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190895.51934.43.10.1161/01.STR.0000190895.51934.4316282537Search in Google Scholar

6. Dave T, Ezhilan J, Vasnawala H, Somani V. Plaque regression and plaque stabilisation in cardiovascular diseases. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:983-989. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.122604.10.4103/2230-8210.122604387271624381872Search in Google Scholar

7. Bittencourt MS, Cerci RJ. Statin effects on atherosclerotic plaques: regression or healing? BMC Medicine. 2015;13:260. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0499-9.10.1186/s12916-015-0499-9459902526449405Search in Google Scholar

8. Yia-Hertualla S, Fog Bentzon J, Daemen M, et al. Stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques: an update. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34:3251-3258. doi: 10.1093/eurheart/eht301.Search in Google Scholar

9. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664-1672. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97.10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.9714530185Search in Google Scholar

10. Dalager MG, Bøttcher M, Thygesen J, Andersen G, Bøtker HE. Different Plaque Composition and Progression in Patients with Stable and Unstable Coronary Syndromes Evaluated by Cardiac CT. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:401357. doi:10.1155/2015/401357.10.1155/2015/401357453832326339610Search in Google Scholar

11. Waxman S, Ishibashi F, Muller JE. Detection and Treatment of Vulnerable Plaques and Vulnerable Patients. Novel Approaches to Prevention of Coronary Events. Circulation. 2006;114:2390-2411. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540013.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.54001317130356Search in Google Scholar

12. Thomsen C, Abdulla J. Characteristics of high-risk coronary plaques identified by computed tomographic angiography and associated prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:120-129. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev325.10.1093/ehjci/jev325488289626690951Search in Google Scholar

13. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840Search in Google Scholar

14. Nakazato R, Otake H. Konishi A, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by CT angiography for identification of high-risk coronary artery lesions: a comparison to optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:373-379. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu188.10.1093/ehjci/jeu18825246503Search in Google Scholar

15. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Quantitative Assessment of Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.004.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164Search in Google Scholar

16. Choi G, Lee JM, Kim HJ, et al. Coronary Artery Axial Plaque Stress and its Relationship With Lesion Geometry: Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1156-1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.024.10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.02426363834Search in Google Scholar

17. Park JB, Choi G, Chun EJ, et al. Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics. Heart. 2016;102:1655-1661. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309299.10.1136/heartjnl-2016-30929927302987Search in Google Scholar

18. Wentzel JJ, Chatzizisis YS, Gijsen FJ, Giannoglou GD, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Endothelial shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vascular remodelling: current understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;96:234-243. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs217.10.1093/cvr/cvs21722752349Search in Google Scholar

19. Benedek T, Mester A, Benedek A, Rat N, Opincariu D, Chițu M. Assessment of Coronary Plaque Vulnerability in Acute Coronary Syndromes using Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound. A systematic Review. Journal of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2016;2(4):173-184. doi: 10.1515/jce-2016-0028.10.1515/jce-2016-0028Search in Google Scholar

20. White SJ, Newby AC, Johnson TW. Endothelial erosion of plaques as a substrate for coronary thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115:509-519. doi: 10.1160/TH15-09-0765.10.1160/th15-09-076526791872Search in Google Scholar

21. Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, et al. Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment: a validation study of in vivo virtual histology compared with in vitro histopathology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2405-2412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.044.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.04416781367Search in Google Scholar