[1. Memtsoudis SG, Sun X, Chiu YL, et al. Perioperative comparative effectiveness of anesthetic technique in orthopedic patients. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1046-58. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318286061d.10.1097/ALN.0b013e318286061d395603823612126]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Helwan M, Avidan MS, Abdallah AB, et al. Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:186-93. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00612.10.2106/JBJS.N.0061225653318]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Johnson RL, Kopp SL, Burkle CM et al. Neuraxial vs general anaesthesia for total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative effectiveness research. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:163–76. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev455.10.1093/bja/aev45526787787]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Cook TM, Counsell DJ, Wildsmith AW. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the third national audit project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:179–90. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen360.10.1093/bja/aen36019139027]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Amir A, Lash V, Moore A et al. Management of a rare complication of epidural analgesia in an obese laterally positioned parturient catheter entrapment next to the inferior vena cava. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:726–8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000324.10.1097/AAP.000000000000032426469368]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Koch J, Nielsen JU. Rare misplacements of epidural catheters. Anesthesiology. 1986;65:556–7.10.1097/00000542-198611000-000263777493]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Inoue S, Nishimine N, Furuya H. Unintentional intrapleural insertion of an epidural catheter: should we remove it or leave it in situ to provide perioperative analgesia? Anesth Analg. 2005;100:266–8. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000140241.97973.73.10.1213/01.ANE.0000140241.97973.7315616089]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:144–54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes214.10.1093/bja/aes21422735301]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Ruzman T, Gulam D, Harsanji I et al. Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade. Local and Reg Anesth. 2014:747–52. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S68451.10.2147/LRA.S68451420004125336987]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Kim JH, Song SY, Kim BJ. Predicting the difficulty in performing a neuraxial blockade. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;61:377–81. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.5.377.10.4097/kjae.2011.61.5.377322901522148085]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Chien I, Lu IC, Wang FY, et al. Spinal process landmark as a predicting factor for difficult epidural block: a prospective study in Taiwanese patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003;19:563–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70507-8.10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70507-8]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia “learning curve”. What is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg Anesth. 1996;21:182-90.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Dogliotti AM. A new method of block anesthesia. Segmental peridural spinal anesthesia. Am J Surg. 1933;20:107-18. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(33)91041-7.10.1016/S0002-9610(33)91041-7]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Saberski LR, Kondamuri S, Osinubi OY. Identification of the epidural space: Is loss of resistance to air a safe technique? A review of the complications related to the use of air. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1997;22:3-9.10.1016/S1098-7339(06)80050-7]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Vasder GM, Chantigian RC. Pneumocephalus following the treatment of a postdural puncture headache with an epidural saline infusion. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6:508-11. doi:10.1016/0952-8180(94)90094-910.1016/0952-8180(94)90094-9]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Shenuda PE, Cunningham BJ. Assessing the superiority of saline versus air for use in the epidural loss of resistance technique: a literature review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:48–53. DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2003.5000910.1053/rapm.2003.5000912567344]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Isakov A, Shtein A, Kyzer S. Pneumoperitoneum after attempted epidural anesthesia. J Crit Care Med. 2016;2:198-200. DOI: 10.1515/jccm-2016-0029.10.1515/jccm-2016-0029595325129967860]Search in Google Scholar