Alternative Possibilities and Causal Overdetermination

Dennett, D. C. 2003. Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Ehring, D. 1997. Causation and Persistence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fara, M. 2008. Masked abilities and compatibilism. Mind 117: 843-65.10.1093/mind/fzn078Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 2012. Deep Control. Essays on Free Will and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199742981.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. 2002. Frankfurt-type cases and semi-compatibilism. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed by Robert Kane. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, J.M. and Ravizza, M. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814594Search in Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818172Search in Google Scholar

Funkhouser, E. 2009. Frankfurt cases and overdetermination. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39: 341-369.10.1353/cjp.0.0053Search in Google Scholar

Ginet, 1996. In defense of the principle of alternative possibilities: why I don’t find Frankfurt’s argument convincing. Philosophical Perspectives 10: 403-17.10.2307/2216254Search in Google Scholar

Hitchcock, C. 2011. Trumping and contrastive causation. Synthese 181: 227-240.10.1007/s11229-010-9799-ySearch in Google Scholar

Huoranszki, F. 2011. Freedom of the Will. A Conditional Analysis. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203836934Search in Google Scholar

Kane, R. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kane, R. 2003. Responsibility, indeterminism, and Frankfurt-style cases: a reply to Mele and Robb. In Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities, ed. by GD Widerker and M. McKenna. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lamb, J. 1993. Evaluative compatibilism and the principle of alternative possibilities. Journal of Philosophy 90: 517-527.10.2307/2941025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. Philosophical Papers. Volume II. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195036468.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mackie, J. 1974. The Cement of the Universe. A Study on Causation. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Mele, A. and D Robb. 1998. Rescuing Frankfurt-style cases. Philosophical Review 107: 97-112.10.2307/2998316Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nelkin, D. 2011. Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608560.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pereboom, D. 2001. Living without Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498824Search in Google Scholar

Schaffer, J. 2000. Trumping preemption. Journal of Philosophy 9: 165-81.10.2307/2678388Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Smith, Michael, 2003. Rational capacities, or: how to distinguish recklessness, weakness, and compulsion. In Weakness of the Will and Varieties of Practical Irrationality, ed. by Stroud and Tappolet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17-38.10.1093/0199257361.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, P. 1978. Ability and responsibility. Philosophical Review 87: 201-224.10.2307/2184752Search in Google Scholar

Vihvelin, K. 2000. Freedom, foreknowledge, and the principle of alternate possibilities. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8: 1-24.10.1080/00455091.2000.10717523Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vihvelin, K. 2004. Free will demystified: a dispositional account. Philosophical Topics 32: 427-50.10.5840/philtopics2004321/211Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Widerker, D. 1995. Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s attack on the principle of alternative possibilities. Philosophical Review 104: 247-61.10.2307/2185979Open DOISearch in Google Scholar