A Bridge Too Far: Conceptual Distance and Creative Ideation

Altshuller, G., & Shulyak, L. (1996). And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Technical Innovation Center, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arreola, N. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2016). The effect of problem construction creativity on solution creativity across multiple everyday problems. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 287.10.1037/a0040389Search in Google Scholar

Aust, F., & Barth, M. (2015). Papaja: Create APA manuscripts with RMarkdown.Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158-163.10.1080/02783190509554310Search in Google Scholar

Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 273-289.10.1002/jocb.35Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Oxford, UK: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203508527Search in Google Scholar

Chan, J., & Schunn, C. (2015). The Impact of Analogies on Creative Concept Generation: Lessons From an In Vivo Study in Engineering Design. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 126-155.10.1111/cogs.12127Search in Google Scholar

Chan, J., Dow, S. P., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Studies, 36, 31-58.10.1016/j.destud.2014.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(8), 401-411.10.1115/1.4004396Search in Google Scholar

Chiu, I., & Shu, L. H. (2012). Investigating effects of oppositely related semantic stimuli on design concept creativity. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 271-296.10.1080/09544828.2011.603298Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 47-60.10.1509/jmkr.39.1.47.18930Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Daly, S. R., Christian, J. L., Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2012). Assessing design heuristics for idea generation in an introductory engineering course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 463-473.Search in Google Scholar

De Bono, E., & Zimbalist, E. (1993). Teach your child how to think. London, UK: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(2), 97-111.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1982.tb00326.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dunbar, K. (2000). How Scientists Think in the Real World: Implications for Science Education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 49-58.10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00050-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1-113.10.1037/h0093599Search in Google Scholar

Elff, M. (2016). Memisc: Tools for Management of Survey Data and the Presentation of Analysis Results. Retrieved from https://rdrr.io/rforge/memisc/Search in Google Scholar

Fantoni, G., Taviani, C., & Santoro, R. (2007). Design by functional synonyms and antonyms: A structured creative technique based on functional analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 221(4), 673-683.10.1243/09544054JEM635Search in Google Scholar

Feldhusen, J. F., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1986). Creativity instructional materials: A review of research. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(3), 153-182.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00435.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fontenot, N. A. (1993). The Effects of Training in Creativity and Creative Problem-finding Upon Business People as Measured by Fluency, Flexibility, and Quality of the Problem Statement. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(1), 11-22.10.1080/00224545.1993.9712114Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, A., & Golden, B. (1997). Why didn’t I think of that? Bizarre origins of ingenious inventions we couldn’t live without. University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fu, K., Chan, J., Cagan, J., Kotovsky, K., Schunn, C., & Wood, K. (2013). The meaning of “near” and “far”: The impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(2), 021007.10.1115/1.4023158Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual spaces as a framework for knowledge representation. Mind and Matter, 2(2), 9-27.Search in Google Scholar

Getzels, J. W., & Smilansky, J. (1983). Individual differences in pupil perceptions of school problems. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 307-316.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02563.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gordon, W. J. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. Collier-Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982.10.1037/a0029159Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Huh, Y.-j., & Kim, M. S. (2012). Study on creativity of game graphics. In Embedded and Multimedia Computing Technology and Service (pp. 339-346). The Netherlands: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 407.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407Search in Google Scholar

Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, M. A. (2016). Ez: Easy Analysis and Visualization of Factorial Experiments. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ez/index.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Malaga, R. A. (2000). The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Decision Support Systems, 29(2), 125-141.10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00067-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220.10.1037/h0048850Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-Based Measures of Creative Problem-Solving Skills: I. Problem Construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 63-76.10.1207/s15326934crj0901_6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Creativity research. Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Nagai, Y., & Noguchi, H. (2003). An experimental study on the design thinking process started from difficult keywords: Modeling the thinking process of creative design. Journal of Engineering Design, 14(4), 429-437.10.1080/09544820310001606911Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

NASA Human Performance Research Group, & others. (1987). Task Load Index (NASATLX) v1. 0 computerised version. NASA Ames Research Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Navarro, D. (2015). Learning statistics with R: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. (Version 0.5). Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide.Search in Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104). Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Search in Google Scholar

Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination, principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Schribner.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, S. K., Atkins, P. W., & Axtell, C. M. (2008). Building Better Workplaces through Individual Perspective Taking: A Fresh Look at a Fundamental Human Process. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23, 149-172.10.1002/9780470773277.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Prabhakaran, R., Green, A. E., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Thin slices of creativity: Using single-word utterances to assess creative cognition. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 641-659.10.3758/s13428-013-0401-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

R Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., & Threlfall, K. V. (1998). Solving everyday problems creatively: The role of problem construction and personality type. Creativity Research Journal, 11(3), 187-197.10.1207/s15326934crj1103_1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Revelle, W. (2017). Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/psych/index.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Rossmann, E., & Fink, A. (2010). Do creative people use shorter associative pathways? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 891-895.10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.025Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding, creativity, and giftedness. Roeper Review, 16(4), 235-241.10.1080/02783199409553588Search in Google Scholar

Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420.10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4), 181-201.10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sowden, P. T., Clements, L., Redlich, C., & Lewis, C. (2015). Improvisation facilitates divergent thinking and creativity: Realizing a benefit of primary school arts education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 128-138.10.1037/aca0000018Search in Google Scholar

Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2016). Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vernon, D., & Hocking, I. (2014). Thinking hats and good men: Structured techniques in a problem construction task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 41-46.10.1016/j.tsc.2014.07.001Search in Google Scholar

Vernon, D., & Hocking, I. (2016). Beyond belief: Structured techniques prove more effective than a placebo intervention in a problem construction task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 153-159.10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.009Search in Google Scholar

Vernon, D., Hocking, I., & Tyler, T. C. (2016). An Evidence-Based Review of Creative Problem Solving Tools A Practitioner’s Resource. Human Resource Development Review, 15(2), 230-259.10.1177/1534484316641512Search in Google Scholar

Warnes, G. R., Bolker, B., Gorjanc, G., Grothendieck, G., Korosec, A., & Lumley, T. (2015). Gdata: Various R Programming Tools for Data Manipulation.Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, R. W. (2009). On ‘out-of-the-box’ thinking in creativity. In Arthur Markman & Kristin Wood (Eds.), Tools for innovation (pp. 23-47). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.Search in Google Scholar

Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Attention, time-sharing, and workload. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3, 439-479.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., Nelson, B. A., & Yen, J. (2010). The effects of biological examples in idea generation. Design Studies, 31(2), 169-186.10.1016/j.destud.2009.10.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Xie, Y. (2015). Dynamic Documents with R and knitr (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Search in Google Scholar

Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2009). Perception of emotion, alexithymia and creative potential. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 353-358.10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.030Open DOISearch in Google Scholar