Accesso libero

Uterine Rupture – Clinical Analysis of a Case Series in Riga Maternity Hospital

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

1. Astatikie G, Limenih MA, Kebede M. Maternal and fetal outcomes of uterinerupture and factors associated with maternal death secondary to uterine rupture // BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2017 Apr 12;17(1):117.10.1186/s12884-017-1302-zSearch in Google Scholar

2. Bij de Vaate A.J.M., van der Voet L.F., Naji O, Wimer M, Veersema S., Brölam H.A.M., Bourne T., Huirne J.A.F. Reply: Niche risk factor for uterine rupture? // Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44:371-372Search in Google Scholar

3. Colmorn LB, Langhoff-Roos J, Jakobsson M, Tapper AM, Gissler M, Lindqvist PG, Källen K, Gottvall K, Klungsøyr K, Bøhrdahl P, Bjarnadóttir RI, Krebs L. NationalRates of Uterine Rupture are not Associated with Rates of Previous CaesareanDelivery: Results from the Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study // Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 May;31(3):176-18210.1111/ppe.12356Search in Google Scholar

4. Eguzo KN, Umezurike CC. Rupture of unscarred uterus: a multi-year cross-sectional study from Nigerian Christian Hospital, Nigeria // Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):657–660Search in Google Scholar

5. Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Baron J, Sheiner E. The significance of a uterinerupture in subsequent births // Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):799-80310.1007/s00404-015-3715-0Search in Google Scholar

6. Hofmeyr GJ, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture // BJOG. 2005 Sep;112(9):1221-810.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Iemura A, Kondoh E, Kawasaki K, Fujita K, Ueda A, Mogami H, Baba T, Konishi I. Expectant management of a herniated amniotic sac presenting as silent uterinerupture: a case report and literature review // J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jan;28(1):106-1210.3109/14767058.2014.900533Search in Google Scholar

8. Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, Morency AM, Lacasse Y, Bujold E. Sonographiclower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematicreview // J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Apr;32(4):321-710.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9Search in Google Scholar

9. Koo YJ, Lee JK, Lee YK, Kwak DW, Lee IH, Lim KT, Lee KH, Kim TJ. PregnancyOutcomes and Risk Factors for Uterine Rupture After Laparoscopic Myomectomy: ASingle-Center Experience and Literature Review // J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1022-810.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.01626012718Search in Google Scholar

10. Mukasa PK, Kabakyenga J, Senkungu JK, Ngonzi J, Kyalimpa M, Roosmalen VJ. Uterine rupture in a teaching hospital in Mbarara, western Uganda, unmatched case-control study // Reprod Health. 2013;10(1):1Search in Google Scholar

11. Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rupture: differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus // American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;191:425–429Search in Google Scholar

12. Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome // American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 189:1042–1046Search in Google Scholar

13. Omole-Ohonsi A, Attah R. Risk factors for ruptured uterus in a developing country. Gynecol Obstetric. 2011;1(102):2161–0932.4. Berhe Y, Wall LL. Uterine rupture in resource-poor countries // Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014 Nov;69(11):695-707Search in Google Scholar

14. Osemwenkha PA, Osaikhuwuomwan JA. A 10- year review of uterine rupture and its outcome in the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City // Niger J Surg Sci 2016; 26:1-4Search in Google Scholar

15. RCOG Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth (Greentop Guideline No. 45) available https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/Search in Google Scholar

16. Ronel D, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E.Trends, risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women withuterine rupture // Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2012;285:317–321Search in Google Scholar

17. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women withprevious cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Feb;291(2):273-8010.1007/s00404-014-3444-925178187Search in Google Scholar

18. Smith JG, Mertz HL, Merrill DC. Identifying risk factors for uterine rupture // ClinPerinatol. 2008;35:85–99Search in Google Scholar

19. Spong CY. Prevention of the first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Clin NorthAm. 2015 Jun;42(2):377-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.010 // Epub 2015 Mar 10.Review. PubMed PMID: 2600217310.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.010444195026002173Search in Google Scholar

20. Vilchez G, Dai J, Kumar K, Lagos M, Sokol RJ. Contemporary analysis ofmaternal and neonatal morbidity after uterine rupture: A nationwidepopulation-based study // J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 201710.1111/jog.1330028188975Search in Google Scholar

21. Zwart J, Richters J, Öry F, de Vries J, Bloemenkamp K, van Roosmalen J. Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study // BJOG 2009;116:1069–1080Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1407-981X
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Surgery, other