[1. Brown, M.T., Ulgiati, S., 2004. Emergy analysis and environmental accounting. Encyclopedia Energy 2, 329-354.10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00242-4]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Brown, M.T., Ulgiati, S. 2010. Updated evaluation of exergy and emergy driving the geobiosphere: A review and refinement of the emergy baseline. Ecol. Model. 221, 2501-2508.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Chen G. Q., Jiang M. M., Chen B., Yang Z. F., Lin C. 2006. Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 115, 1-4: 161-17310.1016/j.agee.2006.01.005]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Castellini C., Bastianoni S., Granai C., Dal Bosco A., Brunetti M. 2006. Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114: 343-35010.1016/j.agee.2005.11.014]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Daily G. C., Söderqvist T., Aniyar S., Arrow K., Dasgupta P., Ehrlich P. R., Folke C., Jansson A., Jansson B., Kautsky N., Levin S., Lubchenco J., Maler K. G., Simpson D., Starrett D., Tilman D., Walker B. 2000. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289: 395-39610.1126/science.289.5478.395]Search in Google Scholar
[6. de Barros I., Blazy J. M., Rodrigues G. S., Tournebize R., Cinna J. P. 2009. Emergy evaluation and economic performance of banana cropping systems in Guadeloupe (French West Indies). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129, 4: 437-44910.1016/j.agee.2008.10.015]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Flichman G., Allen T. 2012. Bio-economic modeling: State-of-the-art and key priorities. CGIAR, Research Program on Policies, Instritutions and Markets.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. http://www.pim.cgiar.org/files/2013/12/FlichmanThomas_BioEconModeling_Final.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Gasparatos A., El-Haram M., Horner M. 2009. The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism. Accounting Forum, 33, 3: 245-25610.1016/j.accfor.2008.07.006]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Gasparatos A., Scolobig A. 2012. Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecological Economics, 80: 1-710.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Godfray H., Charles J., Beddington J. R., Crute I. R., Haddad L., Lawrence D., Muir J. F., Pretty J., Robinson S., Thomas S. M., Toulmin C. 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 Billion people. Science, 327: 812-81810.1126/science.1185383]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Ghisellini P., Zucaro A., Viglia S., Ulgiati S. 2014. Monitoring and evaluating the sustainability of Italian agricultural system. An emergy decomposition analysis. Ecological Modelling, 271: 132-14810.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.014]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hu Q. H., Zhang L. X., Wang C. B. 2012. Emergy-based analysis of two chicken farming systems: a perception of organic production model in China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13: 445-45410.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.038]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Jaklič T., Juvančič L., Kavčič S., Debeljak M. 2014. Complementarity of socioeconomic and emergy evaluation of agricultural production systems: The case of Slovenian dairy sector. Ecological Economics, 107: 469-48110.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.024]Search in Google Scholar
[15. La Rosa A. D., Siracusa G., Cavallaro R. 2008. Emergy evaluation of Sicilian red orange production. A comparison between organic and conventional farming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 17: 1907-191410.1016/j.jclepro.2008.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Lefroy E., Rydberg T. 2003. Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in southwestern Australia. Ecological Modelling,161: 193-20910.1016/S0304-3800(02)00341-1]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Li Q., Yan Q. 2012. Assessing the health of agricultural land with emergy analysis and fuzzy logic in the major grain-producing region. CATENA, 99: 9-1710.1016/j.catena.2012.07.005]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Lu H. F., Baib Y., Rena H., Campbell D. E. 2010. Integrated emergy, energy and economic evaluation of rice and vegetable production systems in alluvial paddy fields: Implications for agricultural policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 12: 2727-273510.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.025]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Odum H. T. 1983. Systems Ecology: An Introduction. New York, John Wiley: 644 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Odum H. T. 1988. Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science, 242: 1132-113910.1126/science.242.4882.1132]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Odum H. T. 1996. Environmental accounting. Energy and environmental decision making. New York, John Wiley & Sons,: 370 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. OECD. 2000. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture. Methods and Results. Executive Summary 2001. OECD Publishing: 53 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. OECD/FAO. 2012. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2012-2021. OECD Publishing and FAO: 286 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Rydberg T., Haden A. C. 2006. Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: Assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 117: 145-15810.1016/j.agee.2006.03.025]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Smith C. A. S., McRae T. 2000. Understanding and Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Agriculture. V: Environmental Sustainability of Canadian Agriculture: Report of the Agri Environmental Indicator Project. A Summary. McRae, T., Smith, C.A.S., Gregorich L.J. (eds.). Ottava, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: 2]Search in Google Scholar
[26. van Zanten B. T., Verburg P. H., Espinosa M., Gomez-y-Paloma S., Galimberti G., Kantelhardt J., Kapfer M., Lefebvre M., Manrique R., Piorr A., Raggi M., Schaller L., Targetti S., Zasada I., Viaggi D. 2014. European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 2: 309-32510.1007/s13593-013-0183-4]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Vigne M., Peyraud J., Lecomte P., Corson M., Wilfart A. 2013. Emergy evaluation of contrasting dairy systems at multiple levels. Journal of Environmental Management, 129: 44-5310.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.015]Search in Google Scholar