[Anderson, Joseph 1996. Reality of Illusion. Carbondale: South Illinois University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrews, David; Andrews, Christine 2012. ‘Film Studies and the Biocultural Turn’. - Philosophy and Literature, 36, 1, 58-78.10.1353/phl.2012.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Bordwell, David [1979] 1999. ‘The Art Cinema as a Mode of Film Practice’. - Leo Braudy, Marshall Cohen (eds.), Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. 5th edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 716-724.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bordwell, David 1986. Narration in Fiction Film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bordwell, David 2002. ‘Intensifi ed Continuity: Visual Style in Contemporary American Film’. - Film Quarterly, 55, 3, 16-28.10.1525/fq.2002.55.3.16]Search in Google Scholar
[Bordwell, David 2008. Poetics of Cinema. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bordwell, David 2012. ‘The Viewer’s Share: Models of Mind in Explaining Film’. http://www.davidbordwell.net/essays/viewersshare.php (12 August 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckland, Warren 2000. Cognitive Semiotics of Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613142]Search in Google Scholar
[Carroll, Noël [1985] 1996. ‘The Power of Movies’. - Noël Carroll, Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 78-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elsaesser, Thomas; Hagener, Malte 2010. Film Theory: An Introduction Through the Senses. New York, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203876879]Search in Google Scholar
[Galt, Rosalind; Schoonover, Karl 2010. ‘Introduction: The Impurity of Art Cinema’. - Rosalind Galt, Karl Schoonover (eds.), Global Art Cinema: New Theories and Histories. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grodal, Torben 2009. Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture and Film. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195371314.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Jauss, Hans Robert; Benzinger, Elizabeth 1970. ‘Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory’. - New Literary History, 2, 1, 7-37.10.2307/468585]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, Daniel 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuhn, Annette; Westwell, Guy 2012. A Dictionary of Film Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acref/9780199587261.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lotman, Juri 2004. Filmisemiootika. Tallinn: Varrak.]Search in Google Scholar
[Odin, Roger 1995. ‘For a Semio-Pragmatics of Film’. - Warren Buckland (ed.), The Film Spectator: From Sign to Mind. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 227-235.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petrie, Graham [1973] 2008. ‘Alternatives to Auteurs’. - Barry Keith Grant (ed.), Auteurs and Authorship. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 110-118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pierson, Ryan 2010. ‘Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film by Torben Grodal’. - Critical Quarterly, 52, 2, 93-99.10.1111/j.1467-8705.2010.01927.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sellors, Paul 2007. ‘Collective Authorship in Film’. - The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65, 3, 263-271.10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00257.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinnenbrink, Robert 2012. New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images. London, New York: Continuum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sperber, Dan; Wilson, Deirdre 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stam, Robert 2000. Film Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomberg, Donald 2009. ‘Mu silm ja süda - need on sõjajalal’. - Sirp, 15 October.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torop, Peeter 1999. ‘Harimise kunst’. - Teater. Muusika. Kino, 5, 65-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waugh, Linda R. 1980. ‘The Poetic Function in the Theory of Roman Jakobson’. - Poetics Today (Roman Jakobson: Language and Poetry), 2, 1a, 57-82.]Search in Google Scholar
