Regulation of Unmanned Aerial Systems and Related Privacy Issues in Lithuania

1. AUVSI. “Economic Impact of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration in the United States.” Economic report by Darryl Jenkins & Bijan Vasigh (March 2013) // https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AUVSI/958c920a-7f9b-4ad2-9807-f9a4e95d1ef1/UploadedImages/New_Economic%20Report%202013%20Full.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Braun, Sven, Friedewald, Michael, and Valkenburg, Govert. “Civilizing Drones: Military Discourses Going Civil?” Science & Technology Studies 28(2) (2015): 73–87.10.23987/sts.55351Search in Google Scholar

3. Butler, Des. “The Dawn of the Age of the Drones: an Australian Privacy Law Perspectives.” UNSW Law Journal 37(2) (2014): 434–469.Search in Google Scholar

4. CAA. “Bepiločiai orlaiviai (BPO) – naujas etapas aviacijos istorijoje” (Unmanned aerial systems – new stage in a history of aviation) // http://www.caa.lt/index.php?1863262406.Search in Google Scholar

5. DRONEZON. “How Do Drones Work and What Is Drone Technology” (May 2017) // https://www.dronezon.com/learn-about-drones-quadcopters/what-is-drone-technology-or-how-does-drone-technology-work/.Search in Google Scholar

6. ENISA. “Privacy and Data Protection by Design” (January 2015) // https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/privacy-and-data-protection-by-design).Search in Google Scholar

7. EU Open Data Portal. “Special Eurobarometer 432: Europeans’ attitudes towards security” (May 2015) // http://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2085_83_2_432_ENG/resource/ae0b54bc-3974-4165-9f7d-c2907cb3f41f.Search in Google Scholar

8. EU. “Commission Staff Working Document ‘Towards a European strategy for the development of civil applications of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS)’” (September 2012) // https://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2013438%202012%20INIT.Search in Google Scholar

9. EU. “Communication for the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, A New Era for Aviation. Opening the aviation market to the civil use of remotely piloted aircraft systems in a safe and sustainable manner” (April 2014) // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0207&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar

10. EU. “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and A European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council” (December 2016) // http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15155-2016-INIT/en/pdf.Search in Google Scholar

11. EU. “Riga Declaration on Remotely Piloted Aircraft (drones) ‘Framing the Future of Aviation’” (March 2015) // https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/modes/air/news/doc/2015-03-06-drones/2015-03-06-riga-declaration-drones.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

12. EU. “Unmanned aircraft (drones)” // https://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/uas_en.Search in Google Scholar

13. MAKEUSEOF. “8 Ways to Prevent Drones Infringing on Your Privacy” (March 2016) // http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/8-ways-prevent-drones-infringing-privacy/.Search in Google Scholar

14. McKown, Martin. “The New Drone State: Suggestions for Legislatures Seeking to Limit Drone Surveillance by Government and Nongovernment Controllers.” University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy 26 (2015): 71–90.Search in Google Scholar

15. Norkūnas, Algis. “Kaltė, kaip civilinės atsakomybės pagrindas” (“Fault as the Basis of Civil Responsibility”). Jurisprudencija 28(20) (2002): 115–121.Search in Google Scholar

16. Vacek, Joseph J. “Remote Sensing of Private Data by Drones Is Mostly Unregulated: Reasonable Expectations of Privacy Are at Risk Absent Comprehensive Federal Legislation.” North Dakota Law Review 90 (2014): 463–484.Search in Google Scholar

17. Villasenor, John. “Observations from Above: Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Privacy.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 36 (2013): 457–517.Search in Google Scholar

18. Vosyliūtė, Andželika. “Įsibrovimo į patalpą, saugyklą ar saugomą teritoriją kaip vagystę kvalifikuojančio požymio samprata teisės moksle ir teismų praktikoje” (The concept of trespassing premises, storage or secured territory as elements of aggravated theft under the theory of law and practice). Teisė 66(1) (2008): 75–94.10.15388/Teise.2008.66.370Search in Google Scholar

1. Asmens duomenų teisinės apsaugos įstatymas (Law on Personal Data Legal Protection). Official Gazette, latest amendment 2008, no. 22-804.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bepiločių orlaivių naudojimo taisyklės (The rules for the use of unmanned aircrafts). TAR, 2014, no. 2014-00438.Search in Google Scholar

3. Č. S. v. I. L. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2015, no. 3K-3-430-415/2015.Search in Google Scholar

4. California v. Ciraolo. 1986, 476 U.S. 207.Search in Google Scholar

5. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 391–407.Search in Google Scholar

6. D. D., A. D. v. R. D. Ruling of Klaipeda Regional Court, 2015, no. 2A-1472-826/2015.Search in Google Scholar

7. Directive 95/46/EC. OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31–50.Search in Google Scholar

8. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14. 1950, ETS 5 // http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3b04.html.Search in Google Scholar

9. G. K. Order of the Criminal Division of Kaunas Regional Court, 2015, no. 1A-582-238/2015.Search in Google Scholar

10. K.A. and A.D. v. Belgium. Nos. 42758/98 and 45558/99, § 83, February 17, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kārtība, kādā veicami bezpilota gaisa kuģu un tādu cita veida lidaparātu lidojumi, kuri nav kvalificējami kā gaisa kuģi (Regulations on the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles). Official Gazette, 2016, no. 231.Search in Google Scholar

12. Köpke v. Germany (dec.). No. 420/07, October 5, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

13. Lietuvos Respublikos administracinių nusižengimų kodeksas (Code of Administrative Offences of the Republic of Lithuania). TAR, 2015, no. 2015-11216.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodeksas (Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 2002, no. 37-1341.Search in Google Scholar

15. Lietuvos Respublikos civilinis kodeksas (Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 2000, no. 74-2262; 200.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucija (Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 1992, no. 220, 33-1014.Search in Google Scholar

17. M.M. v. Russia. No. 7653/06, ECHR 1237.Search in Google Scholar

18. Niemietz v. Germany. December 16, 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B.Search in Google Scholar

19. Nutarimas ‘Dėl teismų praktikos vagystės ir plėšimo baudžiamosiose bylose’ (Ruling ‘On the Case Law in Criminal Cases on the Theft and Robbery’). Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2005, no. 52.Search in Google Scholar

20. Peck v. the United Kingdom. No. 44647/98, § 78, ECHR 2003-I.Search in Google Scholar

21. R. Š. Order of the Criminal Division of Kaunas Regional Court, 2016, no. 1A-144-594/2016.Search in Google Scholar

22. Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency. OJ L 79, 19.3.2008, p. 1–49.Search in Google Scholar

23. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88.Search in Google Scholar

24. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of October 21, 199, Case no. 14/98. Official Gazette, 1999, no. 90-2662.Search in Google Scholar

25. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of December 29, 2004, Case no. 8/02-16/02-25/02-9/03-10/03-11/03-36/03-37/03-06/04-09/04-20/04-26/04-30/04-31/04-32/04-34/04-41/. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 1-7.Search in Google Scholar

26. S. Š., V. Š. Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2008, no. 3K-7-2/2008).Search in Google Scholar

27. Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC]. No. 40167/06, § 255, ECHR 2015.Search in Google Scholar

28. Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania. Nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 43, ECHR 2004-VIII.Search in Google Scholar

29. Smirnova v. Russia. Nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 95, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts).Search in Google Scholar

30. The Law Supplementing the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania with the Constitutional Act “On Membership of the Republic of Lithuania in the European Union” and Supplementing Article 150 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania (no. IX-2343) of 13 July 2004. Official Gazette, 2004, no. 111-4123.Search in Google Scholar

31. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 47–390.Search in Google Scholar

32. V. A. V. v. L. V. Ruling of the Civil Division of Klaipeda Regional Court, 2017, no. 2A-980-730/2017.Search in Google Scholar

33. V. N. Ruling of the Civil Division of Vilnius Regional Court, 2017, no. e2A-58-661/2017.Search in Google Scholar

34. Valstybės sienos apsaugos tarnybos prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos vado įsakymas Nr. 4-544 ‘Dėl Prievartos prieš bepiločius orlaivius panaudojimo tvarkos aprašo patvirtinimo’ (Order of the Chief of State Border Guard Service under the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Lithuania ‘On the Approval of the Description of the Procedure for the Use of Violence against UAS’). TAR, 2017, no. 2017-19908.Search in Google Scholar