Factors that Influence Parole Boards’ and Judges’ Decisions on Parole Application in Lithuania

1. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative research in psychology 3 (2) (2006): 77−101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar

2. Danziger, Shai, Jonathan Levav, and Liora Avnam-Pesso. “Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (17) (April 2011): 6889-6892 // DOI:10.1073/pnas.1018033108.10.1073/pnas.1018033108Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Englich, Birte, Thomas Mussweiler, and Fritz Strack. “The last word in court − a hidden disadvantage for the defense.” Law and Human Behavior 29 (6) (2005): 705−722 // DOI:10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7.10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. George, Tracy E., and Lee Epstein. “On the nature of Supreme Court decision making.” American Political Science Review 86 (2) (1992): 323–337.10.2307/1964223Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Gobeil, Renée, and Ralph C. Serin. “Preliminary evidence of adaptive decision making techniques used by parole board members.” International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 8.2 (September 2009): 97–104 // DOI: 10.1080/14999010903199258.10.1080/14999010903199258Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Huebner, Beth M., and Timothy S. Bynum. “An analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders: A focal concerns perspective.” Criminology 44(4) (2006): 961–991.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00069.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Malouff, John, and Nicola S. Schutte. “Shaping juror attitudes: Effects of requesting different damage amounts in personal injury trials.” The Journal of Social Psychology 129 (4) (1989): 491−497.10.1080/00224545.1989.9712067Search in Google Scholar

8. Morgan, Kathryn D., and Brent Smith. “The impact of race on parole decision-making.” Justice Quarterly 25 (2) (2008): 411–435.10.1080/07418820802024986Search in Google Scholar

9. Mussweiler, Thomas. “Sentencing Under Uncertainty: Anchoring Effects in the Courtroom.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31 (7) (2001): 1535–1551.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02687.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Proctor, John L. “The ‘new parole’: An analysis of Parole board decision making as a function of eligibility.” Journal of Crime & Justice 22 (2) (1999): 193–217.10.1080/0735648X.1999.9721100Search in Google Scholar

11. Report of the Supervision Unit of the Prison Department under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania on Parole Process and Parole Boards’ and Courts’s Motives of Parole Declination in Year 2015. March 14^th, 2016, no. LV-948.Search in Google Scholar

12. Sakalauskas, Gintautas. “Kalinimo sąlygos ir kalinių resocializacijos prielaidos” (Prison conditions and premises of prisoners’ resocialization). Teisės problemos 2 (2015): 5–53.Search in Google Scholar

13. Sakalauskas, Gintautas. “Lygtinis paleidimas iš įkalinimo įstaigų įsigaliojus Probacijos įstatymui: teorija ir praktika” (Parole application after the enactment of Probation act: theory and practice). Teisės problemos 4 (82) (2013): 5–39.Search in Google Scholar

14. Sakalauskas, Gintautas. “Nuteistųjų laisvės atėmimo bausme užimtumas: padėtis ir galimybės” (Employment of imprisoned persons: current situation and opportunities). Teisės e-aktualijos 2 (8) (2015): 4–20.Search in Google Scholar

15. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgement under uncertainity: Heuristics and biases.” Science 185 (4157) (1974): 1124−1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124Search in Google Scholar

16. Vosyliūtė, Andželika. “Lygtinio paleidimo iš pataisos įstaigų taikymo teismų praktikoje probleminiai aspektai” (Problematic aspects of parole application in court practice): 95–115. In: Gintaras Švedas, ed. Bausmių vykdymo sistemos teisinis reguliavimas ir perspektyvos Lietuvos Respublikoje (Legal regulation and perspectives of penal system in Lithuania). Vilnius: Prison Department under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

1. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 37-1341.Search in Google Scholar

2. Law of Changes of the 11, 17, 18, 21, 25, 30 and 31 Articles of Probation Act of the Republic of Lithuania. Register of Legal Acts, 2015, no. 11079.Search in Google Scholar

3. Law on Changes of the 18, 19, 66, 90, 91, 126, 138, 140, 152, 154, 157, 158, 159, 164, 176 Articles and invalidation of the 127, 160, 161, 162, 163, 179 Articles of Penal Enforcement Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 4-110.Search in Google Scholar

4. Law on Changes of the Penal Enforcement Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Register of Legal Acts, 2015, no. 11069.Search in Google Scholar

5. Law on Courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1994, no. 46-851.Search in Google Scholar

6. Order of Minister of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania No 1R-154 on Confirmation of Parole Boards Rules. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 65-3314.Search in Google Scholar

7. Order of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania on the Approval of the Form of Social Research Report and Methodical Recommendations for the Preparation of Social Research Report. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 68-3500.Search in Google Scholar

8. Penal Enforcement Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 73–3084.Search in Google Scholar

9. Probation Act of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 4-108.Search in Google Scholar