[1. Bachmaier Winter, Lorena. “European Investigation Order for obtaining evidence in the criminal proceedings. Study of the proposal for European Directive.” Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik – www.zis-online.com (2010): 580–589.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Belfiore, Rosanna. “Movement of Evidence in the EU: The Present Scenario and Possible Future Developments.” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 17(2009): 1–22.10.1163/157181709X400368]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Farries, Anthony. “The European Investigation Order: stepping forward with care.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 1 (2010): 425–432.10.1177/203228441000100403]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Gless, Sabine. “Free Movement of Evidence in Europe.” El derecho procesal penal en la Unión Europea: tendencijas actuales y perspectivas de futuro // http://ius.unibas.ch/uploads/publics/5868/20100913144618_4c8e1d1af2837.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. González, Joaquín González-Herrero, and Maria Madalina Butincu. “The Collection of Evidence by OLAF and Its Transmission to the National Judicial Authorities.” The European Criminal Law Association‘s Forum (EUCRIM) 3 (2009): 90–94.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Hetzer, Wolfgang. “National Criminal Prosecution and European Tendering of Evidence. Perspectives of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 12/2 (2004): 166–189.10.1163/1571817041107296]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hildebrandt, Mireille. “European Criminal Law and European Identity.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (2007): 57–78.10.1007/s11572-006-9006-x]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Karsai, Krisztina. “The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the International Cooperation in Criminal Matters.” Zbornik radova Pravnogo fakulteta u Novom Sadu 1-2 (2008): 941–953.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Klimek, Libor. “Free Movement of Evidence in Criminal Matters in the EU.” The Lawyer Quarterly 4 (2012): 250–290.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Klip, André. Criminal Law in the European Union. Deventer, Kluwer, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Lach, Arkadiusz. “Transnational Gathering of Evidence in Criminal Cases in the EU de lege lata and de lege ferenda.” The European Criminal Law Association’s Forum (EUCRIM) 3 (2009): 107–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Mangiaracina, Annalisa. “A New and Controversial Scenario in the Gathering of Evidence at the European Level. The Proposal for a Directive on the European Investigation Order.” Utrecht Law Review 10 (2014): 113–133.10.18352/ulr.260]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Mitsilegas, Valsamis. EU Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford Hart Publishing, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Murphy, Cian C. “The European Evidence Warrant: Mutual Recognition and Mutual (Dis)Trust?” Social Science Research Network 3 (2010): 1–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Murray, Christopher. “The Impact of the Proposed European Evidence Warrant on the Rights of Suspects, Defendants and Innocent third Parties”: 48–69. In: Marisa Leaf, ed. Cross-Border Crime. Defence Rights in a New Era of International Judicial Co-operation. London: Justice, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Ruggeri, Stefano. “Introduction to the Proposal of a European Investigation Order: Due Process Concerns and Open Issues”: 4–25. In: Transnational Evidence and Multicultural Inquiries in Europe. Developments in EU Legislation and New Challenges for Human Rights-Oriented Criminal Investigations in Cross-border Cases. Springer International Publishing, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Sayers, Debbie. “The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’.” CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe (2011): 1–25 // https://www.ceps.eu/publications/european-investigation-order-travelling-without-%E2%80%98roadmap%E2%80%99.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Staes, Dorothea. “The Interrogation of Witnesses abroad in Execution of a European Investigation Order. An Examination from the Eyes of the Defence.” EIUC European Inter-University Center for Human Rights and Democratisation (2011): 1–85 // http://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/6214/1/Staes_2011.PDF.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Tomášek, Michal. “Human Rights as Means of Europeanisation of Criminal Law.” Czech Yearbook of International Law 1 (2010): 173–185.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Vervaele, John. “Ne Bis In Idem: Towards a Transnational Constitutional Principle in the EU?” Utrecht Law Review 9 (2013): 211–229.10.18352/ulr.251]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Vervaele, John. “The European Arrest Warrant and Applicable Standards of Fundamental Rights in the EU.” Review of European Administrative Law 1 (2013): 37–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. 2002/584/JHA: Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States - Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32002F0584.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament – Implementing The Hague Programme: the way forward (COM/2006/0331 final) // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0331.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens – Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0171.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32002F0584.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the EU of orders freezing property or evidence // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32001Y0115(02).]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA of 18 December 2008 on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:350:0072:0092:en:PDF.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters. OJ L 174, (2001): 1–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0041.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 20 April 1959 // https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016800656ce.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. German Bundestag, 17th electoral term. Recommendation for a decision and report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (6th Committee) on the communication of the Federal Government – Printed Paper 17/2071, No. A.7 – Initiative for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council regarding a European Investigation Order in criminal matters. Council Document 9145/10. Printed Paper 17/3234.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Green Paper on obtaining evidence in criminal matters from one Member State to another and securing its admissibility. COM/2009/0624 final // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2009:0624:FIN.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Slovenia and the Kingdom of Sweden for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of … regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters. OJ, C (2010): 22–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. JHA Trio Presidency Programme (January 2010-June 2011) Council Doc. No 5008/10 of January 4, 2010 // http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%205008%202010%20INIT.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Presidency Conclusions, Tampere European Council of October 15-16, 1999 // http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam_en.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32001Y0115(02).]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European Evidence Warrant for obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters, COM(2003) 688 // http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2003/EN/1-2003-688-EN-F1-1.Pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. The Hague Programme: strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52005XG0303(01).]Search in Google Scholar
