[Allain V. Mirabito L. Arnould C. Colas M.,Le Bouquin S. Lupo C., Michel V. (2009). Skin lesions in broiler chickens measured at the slaughterhouse: relationships between lesions and between their prevalence and rearing factors. Brit. Poultry Sci., 50: 407-417.10.1080/0007166090311090119735009]Search in Google Scholar
[Ask B. (2010). Genetic variation of contact dermatitis in broilers. Poultry Sci., 89: 866-875.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bilgili S.F., Hess J.B., Blake J.P., Macklin K.S., Saenmahayak B., Sibley J.L. (2009). Influence of bedding material on footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 18: 583-589.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jong I.C., Van Harn J., Gunnink H., Hindle V.A., Louren s A. (2012). Footpad dermatitis in Dutch broiler flocks: Prevalence and factors of influence. Poultry Sci., 91: 1569-1574.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jong I.C., Gunnink H., Van Harn J. (2014). Wet litter not only induces footpad dermatitis but also reduces overall welfare, technical performance, and carcass yield in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 1: 51-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deep A., Schwean-Lardner K, Crowe T.G., Fancher B.I., Classen H.L. (2010). Effect of light intensity on broiler production, processing characteristics and welfare. Poultry Sci., 89: 2326-2333.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dukic-Stojcic M., Bessei W. (2011). The effect of weight load on the legs of broilers behavior. Biotech. Anim. Husb., 27: 1667-1671.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dozier W.A., Thaxton J.P., Branton S.L., Morgan G.W., Miles D.M., Roush W.B., Lott B.D., Vizzier-Thaxton Y. (2005). Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Sci., 84: 1332-1338.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eichner G., Vieira S.L., Torres C.A., Coneglian J.L.B., Freitas D.M., Oyarza- b a l O.A. (2007). Litter moisture and footpad dermatitis as affected by diets formulated on an allvegetable basis or having the inclusion of poultry by-product. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 16: 344-350.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrante V, Lolli S., Marelli S., Vezzoli G., Sirri F., Cavalchini L.G. (2006). Effect of light programs, bird densities and litter types on broilers welfare. Proc. XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy, 10-14.09.2006, p. 586.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimes J.L., Smith J., Williams C.M. (2002). Some alternative litter materials used for growing broilers and turkeys. World Poultry Sci. J., 58: 515-526.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimes J.L., Carter T. A., Godwin J.L. (2006). Use of a litter material made from cotton waste, gypsum, and old newsprint for rearing broiler chickens. Poultry Sci., 85: 563-568.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haslam S.M., Knowles T.G., Brown S.N., Wilkins L.J., Ke s tin S.C., Warriss P.D., Nicol C.J. (2007). Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. Brit. Poultry Sci., 48: 264-275.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hepworth P.J., Nefedov A.V., Muchnik I.B., Morgan K.L. (2010). Early warning indicators for hock burn in broiler flocks. Avian Pathol., 5: 405-409.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hester P.Y. (1994). The role of environment and management on leg abnormalities in meat-type fowl. Poultry Sci., 73: 904-915.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kestin S.C., Su G., Sorensen P. (1999). Different commercial broiler crosses have different susceptibilities to leg weakness. Poultry Sci., 78: 1085-1090.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kjaer J.B., Su G., Nielsen B.L., Sorensen P. (2006). Foot pad dermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens and degree of inheritance. Poultry Sci., 85: 1342-1348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kristensen H.H., Perry G.C., Prescott N.B., Ladewig J., Ersboll A.K., Wathes CM. (2006). Leg health and performance of broiler chickens reared in different light environments. Brit. Poultry Sci., 47: 257-263.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis P.D., Morris T.R. (1998). Responses of domestic poultry to various light sources. World Poultry Sci. J., 54: 7-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis P.D., Morris T.R. (2000). Poultry and colored lights. World Poultry Sci. J., 56: 189-207.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meluzzi A., Fabbri C., Folegatti E., Sirri F. (2008). Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries. Brit. Poultry Sci., 49: 257-264.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nagaraj M., Wilson C.A.P., Hess J.B., Bilgili S.F. (2007). Effect of high-protein and allvegetable diets on the incidence and severity of pododermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 16: 304-312.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohtani S., Tanaka K. (1998). The effects of intermittent lighting on activity of broiler chickens. Jpn. Poultry Sci., 35: 117-124.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanotra G.S., Berg C., Damkjer L.J. (2003). A comparison between leg problems in Danish and Swedish broiler production. Anim. Welfare, 12: 677-683.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwean-Lardner K., Fancher B.I., Classen H.L. (2012). Impact of daylength on the productivity of two broiler strains. Brit. Poultry Sci., 53: 7-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwean-Lardner K., Fancher B.I., Gomis S., Van Kessel A., Dalal S., Classen H.L. (2013). Effect of day length on cause of mortality, leg health, and ocular health in broilers. Poultry Sci., 92: 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shepherd E.M., Fairchild B.D. (2010). Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Sci., 89: 2043-2051.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skomorucha I., Sosnowka-Czajka E., Muchacka R. (2010). Effect of thermal conditions on welfare of broiler chickens of different origin. Ann. Anim. Sci., 10: 489-497.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skrbic Z., Pavlovski Z., Vitorovic D., Lukic M., Petricevic V. (2009). The effects of stocking density and light program on tibia quality of broilers of different genotype. Arch. Zootech., 12: 56-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skrbic Z., Pavlovski Z., Lukic M., Petricevic V. (2010). Assessment of broiler welfare in different stocking densities. Proc. XIII European Poultry Conference, Tours, France, August 23-27.08.2010, p. 908.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skrbic Z., Pavlovski Z., Lukic M., Petricevic V, Miljkovic B., Marinkov G. (2012). The effect of the diet on incidence of footpad lesions and productivity of broilers. Biotech. Anim. Husb., 28: 353-360.]Search in Google Scholar
[Su G., Sorensen P., Kestin S.C. (2000). A note on the effects ofperches and litter substrate on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci., 79: 1259-1263.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas D.G., Ravindran V, Thomas D.V., Camden B.J., Cottam Y.H., Morel P.C.H., Cook C.J. (2004). Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zeal. Vet. J., 52: 76-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang G., Ekstrand C., Svedberg J. (1998). Wet litter and perches as risk factors for the development of foot pad dermatitis in floor-housed hens. Brit. Poultry Sci., 39: 191-197.]Search in Google Scholar
[You s s e f I.M.I., Beineke A., Rohn K., Kamphues J. (2010). Experimental study on effects of litter material and its quality on foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 1125-1135. ]Search in Google Scholar