Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Highest Reported PSA Level

1. Grönberg H. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet Lond Engl. 2003;361(9360):859–864.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12713-4Search in Google Scholar

2. Globocan 2012. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

3. Benoit RM, Naslund MJ. The socioeconomic implications of prostate-specific antigen screening. Urol Clin North Am. 1997;24(2):451–458.10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70392-XSearch in Google Scholar

4. Krpina K, Markić D, Rahelić D, Ahel J, Rubinić N, Španjol J. 10-year survival of a patient with metastatic prostate cancer: Case report and literature review. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015;87(3):252-3. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2015.3.252.10.4081/aiua.2015.3.25226428652Search in Google Scholar

5. Slipman CW, Patel RK, Siegelman ES, et al. Metastatic prostate cancer to the spine and a PSA of 5666: a case report. Pain Physician. 2001;4(4):317–321.10.36076/ppj.2001/4/317Search in Google Scholar

6. Persec Z, Persec J, Sović T, Romic Z, Bosnar Herak M, Hrgovic Z. Metastatic prostate cancer in an asymptomatic patient with an initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum concentration of 21,380 ng/ml. Onkologie. 2010;33(3):110–112. doi: 10.1159/000277743.10.1159/00027774320215802Search in Google Scholar

7. Dantanarayana ND, Hossack T, Cozzi P, et al. Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia. BMC Urol. 2015;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0117-3.10.1186/s12894-015-0117-3469623326715039Search in Google Scholar

8. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL, et al. Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(2):125–132. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr500.10.1093/jnci/djr500326013222228146Search in Google Scholar

9. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–1328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa081008410.1056/NEJMoa081008419297566Search in Google Scholar

10. Buzzoni C, Auvinen A, Roobol MJ, et al. Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):885–890. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042.10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042498286925791513Search in Google Scholar

11. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Carlsson S, et al. Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):745–752. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.068.10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.06822704366Search in Google Scholar

12. Woolf SH. Public health perspective: the health policy implications of screening for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1994;152(5 Pt 2):1685–1688.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32361-3Search in Google Scholar

13. Sun M, Choueiri TK, Hamnvik O-PR, et al. Comparison of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists and Orchiectomy: Effects of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(4):500-507. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4917.10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.491726720632Search in Google Scholar

14. Nyman CR, Andersen JT, Lodding P, Sandin T, Varenhorst E. The patient’s choice of androgen-deprivation therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer: bicalutamide, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue or orchidectomy. BJU Int. 2005;96(7):1014–1018.10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05802.x16225519Search in Google Scholar

15. Leidinger P, Hart M, Backes C, et al. Differential blood-based diagnosis between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: miRNA as source for biomarkers independent of PSA level, Gleason score, or TNM status. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(8):10177-10185. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-4883-7.10.1007/s13277-016-4883-726831660Search in Google Scholar