[AGEGNEHU, G. – BASS, A.M. – NELSON, P.N. – BIRD, M.I. 2016. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. In Science of The Total Environment, vol. 543, pp. 295–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.05410.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054]Search in Google Scholar
[DZIADOWIEC, H. – GONET, S.S. 1999. Przewodnik metodyczny do badań materii organicznej gleb [Methodical guide-book for soil organic matter studies]. Prace Komisji Naukowych Polskiego Towarzystwa Gleboznawczego, N. 120, Komisja chemii gleb, Zespół Materii Organicznej Gleb, N II/16, 65 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[FISCHER, D. – GLASER, B. 2012. Synergisms between compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration. In KUMAR, S. (Ed.). Management of Organic Waste. In Tech Europe, Rijeka. pp. 167–198.]Search in Google Scholar
[HOYLE, F.C. – BALDOCK, J.A. – MURPHY, D.V. 2011. Soil organic carbon Role in rainfed farming systems. In TOW, P. – COOPER, I. – PARTRIDGE, I. – BIRCH, C. (Eds.). Rainfed Farming Systems. Dordrecht : Springer, pp. 339–361.]Search in Google Scholar
[KIMETU, J. – LEHMANN, J. 2010. Stability and stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents. In Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 48, pp. 577–585. DOI: 10.1071/SR1003610.1071/SR10036]Search in Google Scholar
[KIRKBY, C.A. – KIRKEGAARD, J.A. – RICHARDSON, A.E. – WADE, L.J. – BLANCHARD, C. – BATTEN, G. 2011. Stable soil organic matter: A comparison of C:N:P:S ratios in Australian and other world soils. In Geoderma, vol. 136, pp. 197–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.01010.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.010]Search in Google Scholar
[KOBZA, J. – GAŠOVÁ, K. 2014. Soil monitoring system as a basic tool for protection of soils and sustainable land use in Slovakia. In Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, vol. 4, pp. 504–513.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOIDE, R.T. – NGUYEN, B.T. – SKINNER, R.H. – DELL, C.J. – PEOPLES, M.S. – ADLER, P.R. – DROHAN, P.J. 2014. Biochar amendment of soil improves resilience to climate change. In GCB Bioenergy, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1084–1091. DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.1219110.1111/gcbb.12191]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠIMANSKÝ, V. – BALASHOV, E. – HORÁK, J. 2016. Water stability of soil aggregates and their ability to sequester carbon in soils of vineyards in Slovakia. In Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 177–197. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2015.104868310.1080/03650340.2015.1048683]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠIMANSKÝ, V. – HORÁK, J. – IGAZ, D. – JONCZAK, J. – MARKIEWICZ, M. – FELBER, R. – RIZHIYA, E.Y. – LUKAC, M. 2016. How dose of biochar and biochar with nitrogen can improve the parameters of soil organic matter and soil structure? In Biologia, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 989–995. DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2016-012210.1515/biolog-2016-0122]Search in Google Scholar
[SOLAIMAN, Z.M. – ANAWAR, H.M. 2015. Application of Biochars for Soil Constraints: Challenges and Solutions. In Pedosphere, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 631–638. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30044-810.1016/S1002-0160(15)30044-8]Search in Google Scholar
[VILČEK, J. − BEDRNA, Z. 2007. Vhodnosť poľnohospodárskych pôd a krajiny Slovenska na pestovanie rastlín [The eligibility of agricultural soils and landscapes of Slovakia for the cultivation of plants]. Bratislava : Výskumný ústav pôdoznalectva a ochrany prírody, pp. 248]Search in Google Scholar
[YANG, X. – REN, W. – SUN, B. – ZHANG, S. 2012. Effects of contrasting soil management regimes on total and labile soil organic carbon fractions in a loess soil in China. In Geoderma, vol. 177–178, pp. 49–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.01.03310.1016/j.geoderma.2012.01.033]Search in Google Scholar