Accesso libero

Are Soils Forming on Buildings Indicators of Pollution in The City? A Case Study from Lublin (Eastern Poland)

, ,  e   
31 mar 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Fig. 1.

Location of study area.
Location of study area.

Fig. 2.

Analysed soils: 1LU – watermill, 2LU – brick wall, 3LU – industrial plant (dyehouse), 4LU – railway outbuilding, 5LU – industrial plant, 6LU – car garage, 7LU – railway ramp, 8LU – concrete bridge pillar.
Analysed soils: 1LU – watermill, 2LU – brick wall, 3LU – industrial plant (dyehouse), 4LU – railway outbuilding, 5LU – industrial plant, 6LU – car garage, 7LU – railway ramp, 8LU – concrete bridge pillar.

Fig. 3.

A) Type of artefacts and the percentage of edifisols in them (% vol.). B) Examples of artefacts in edifisols: 1 – metal components, 2 – roofing felt, 3 – integrated circuit, 4 – trash (bottle stoper), 5 – slag, 6 – glass shards, 7 – plastic elements.
A) Type of artefacts and the percentage of edifisols in them (% vol.). B) Examples of artefacts in edifisols: 1 – metal components, 2 – roofing felt, 3 – integrated circuit, 4 – trash (bottle stoper), 5 – slag, 6 – glass shards, 7 – plastic elements.

Fig. 4.

A) Results of PCA; B) results of cluster analysis.
A) Results of PCA; B) results of cluster analysis.

Fig. 5.

Heavy metal content as determined by the indicator Igeo.
Heavy metal content as determined by the indicator Igeo.

Fig. 6.

Heavy metal content determined by the factor EF.
Heavy metal content determined by the factor EF.

Fig. 7.

PLI for the soil profiles studied.
PLI for the soil profiles studied.

Fig. 8.

Potential ecological risks for the soil profiles studied.
Potential ecological risks for the soil profiles studied.

Heavy metal content_

Horizon Depth Cd Cu Mn Pb Zn Ni Cr Fe
[cm] [mg·kg−1] [g·kg−1]
1LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall (watermill)
Ada 0–6 2.2 16.2 181.8 n.d. 257.3 n.d. 43.0 8.8
2LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall
Aca 0–3 1.8 9.6 150.2 n.d. 77.3 n.d. 39.6 6.5
Ca 3–6 2.0 6.2 125.9 n.d. 26.3 n.d. 36.5 5.2
3LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall (dyework)
Aa 0–7 2.7 13.5 158.6 n.d. 220.1 n.d. 29.8 4.8
AC(Ca) 7–10 1.6 2.9 72.8 n.d. 24.5 n.d. 21.0 2.5
4LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – roof of outbuilding (gap)
Ada 0–5 1.2 29.4 292.5 16.2 150.6 29.1 27.6 14.1
5LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – gutter on an industrial plant
A 0–4 1.6 45.6 794.8 34.5 670.0 60.9 95.8 39.0
Ada 4–8 1.5 44.8 744.1 30.5 436.6 53.1 80.2 36.4
6LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – gutter on a car garage
Ada 0–4 1.2 34.0 758.6 21.1 340.4 38.8 43.9 25.8
ACa 4–8 1.6 41.0 449.6 45.0 698.1 38.8 47.4 28.7
Ca 8–10 2.2 52.0 355.0 80.6 1177.0 51.7 45.3 34.9
7LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – concrete railway ramp
Ada 0–6 3.3 34.8 457.7 116.9 432.6 39.3 42.2 22.4
8LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – concrete bridge pillar
A 0–6 6.0 55.2 258.6 759.6 359.7 21.5 31.2 14.8
Ada 6–12 6.1 33.9 310.0 475.8 275.4 20.3 28.0 15.6
mean 2.5 29.9 365.0 112.9 367.6 25.2 43.7 18.5
standard deviation 1.6 16.8 236.6 215.5 301.6 21.6 19.8 12.2
kurtosis 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1
skewness 82.2 -12948.0 131032176.9 308047370.4 474593294.9 12534.4 165749.3 8191.8
Local geochemical background 0.5 3.0 120.0 10.0 25.0 3.0 3.0 9200.0
[mg·kg−1]

Geoaccumulation index, enrichment factor and potential environmental risk index_

0.00 Cd Ni Cu Zn Cr Mn Pb
Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo)
Mean 1.34 1.81 2.21 2.26 3.13 0.70 1.32
Max 3.01 3.66 3.33 4.12 4.28 2.10 5.32
Min 0.67 0.00 0.46 0.12 2.57 -0.56 0.00
SD 0.81 1.56 1.25 1.60 0.56 0.90 1.91
Enrichment Factor (EF)
Mean 3.72 3.13 5.12 6.10 10.57 1.71 5.71
Max 8.50 6.41 9.04 8.74 20.02 2.24 37.60
Min 0.76 0.00 3.67 2.66 4.76 1.41 0.00
SD 2.90 2.68 1.83 2.05 6.49 0.29 12.98
Potential Environmental Risk Index
Profile Cd Ni Cu Zn Cr Mn Pb
1LU 87.60 0.00 17.90 5.50 28.70 n.d. 0.00
2LU 90.60 0.00 12.30 1.80 24.10 n.d. 0.00
3LU 106.80 0.00 12.50 3.60 18.00 n.d. 0.00
4LU 71.60 48.50 49.00 6.00 18.40 n.d. 8.10
5LU 93.10 95.00 75.30 22.10 58.70 n.d. 16.20
6LU 100.60 71.80 70.60 29.50 30.30 n.d. 24.40
7LU 195.40 65.50 57.90 17.30 28.10 n.d. 58.40
8LU 363.70 60.60 74.20 12.70 19.70 n.d. 308.80

General characteristics of the study sites_

Profile Location Type of building Position Technogenic parent material Existing vegetation
Fragment of the building Height above ground level City district
[m]
1LU 51.216N Watermill* Brick wall 4 Residential Brick, mortar Geum urbanum L.
22.544E
2LU 51.255N Wall* Brick wall 1 Residential Brick, mortar Acer negundo L.
22.565E
3LU 51.243N Industrial plant (dyework)* Brick wall 3.5 Residential Brick, mortar Calamagrostis epigejos L.
22.570E Solidago canadensis L.
4LU 51.239N Railway outbuilding* Gap in concrete ceiling 2.5 Industrial Concrete Solidago canadensis L.
22.608E Poa annua L.
5LU 51.211N Industrial plant Gutter 4 Industrial n.d. Poa pratensis L.
20.570E
6LU 51.263N Car garage Gutter 3 Residential n.d. Alliaria petiolata
22.568E
7LU 51.234N Railway ramp next to an industrial plant* Concrete railway ramp 1 Industrial Concrete Calamagrostis epigejos L.
22.607E Solidago canadensis L.
8LU 51.255N Road bridge* Concrete bridge pillar 1 Industrial Concrete Solidago canadensis L.
22.599E Acer tataricum L.

Granulometric composition and chemical properties of the studied soils_

Horizon Depth Skeleton Fraction Soil texture (USDA) pH [H2O] OC CaCO3
Sand Silt Clay
(2.0–0.05 mm) (0.05–0.002 mm) (<0.002 mm)
[cm] [%] [–] [%]
1LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall (watermill)
Auh 0–6 54.9 43.6 51.4 5.0 SiL 7.1 8.0 2.1
2LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall
Au 0–3 42.9 51.4 46.1 2.5 SL 7.8 1.2 5.6
Cu 3–6 5.1 64.6 32.9 2.5 SL 8.1 0.5 6.8
3LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall (dyework)
Au 0–7 37.6 81.3 16.2 2.5 LS 8.0 1.5 12.4
AuCu 7–10 20.0 81.8 15.7 2.5 LS 8.2 0.3 6.8
4LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – roof of outbuilding (gap)
Au 0–5 26.6 70.4 29.6 0.0 LS 7.9 3.5 2.8
5LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – gutter on an industrial plant
Auh1 0–4 0.0 67.4 32.6 0.0 SL 7.7 6.8 n.d.
Auh2 4–8 0.0 62.3 37.7 0.0 SL 7.4 6.5 n.d.
6LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – gutter on a car garage
Auh 0–4 0.0 60.5 39.5 0.0 SL 7.3 5.5 n.d.
Au1 4–8 0.0 64.1 35.9 0.0 SL 7.7 3.8 n.d.
Au2 8–10 0.0 43.5 56.5 0.0 SiL 7.2 3.8 n.d.
7LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – concrete railway ramp
Auh 0–6 44.9 62.6 37.4 0.0 SL 7.8 5.2 3.3
8LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – concrete bridge pillar
Au1 0–6 19.5 73.0 27.0 0.0 LS 7.7 2.2 1.5
Au2 6–12 20.4 71.3 28.7 0.0 LS 7.8 2.8 2.2

Cation exchange properties_

Horizon Depth Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ HA BEC ECEC BS
[cm] [cmol·kg−1] [%]
1LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall (watermill)
Ada 0–6 73.00 11.02 1.65 0.96 5.10 86.63 91.73 94.44
2LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall
Aca 0–3 65.80 6.75 1.98 0.61 1.65 75.14 76.79 97.85
Ca 3–6 90.80 5.00 1.08 0.49 1.25 97.37 98.62 98.74
3LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – brick wall (dyework)
Aa 0–7 88.20 3.69 1.72 0.38 1.02 93.99 95.01 98.93
AC(Ca) 7–10 104.00 1.94 1.60 0.28 1.38 107.82 109.20 98.74
4LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – roof of outbuilding (gap)
Ada 0–5 33.76 0.02 0.14 1.02 0.96 34.95 35.91 97.33
5LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – gutter on an industrial plant
A 0–4 4.35 0.02 0.10 0.09 2.04 4.56 6.60 69.10
Ada 4–8 7.39 0.01 0.12 0.11 1.53 7.63 9.16 83.29
6LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – gutter on a car garage
Ada 0–4 6.34 0.01 0.11 0.23 1.74 6.68 8.42 79.34
Aca 4–8 3.33 0.01 0.10 0.09 1.88 3.54 5.41 65.36
Ca 8–10 8.67 0.01 0.10 0.13 1.23 8.92 10.15 87.88
7LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – concrete railway ramp
Ada 0–6 23.37 0.01 0.14 0.05 0.89 23.58 24.46 96.38
8LU Isolatic Linic Technosol – concrete bridge pillar
A 0–6 17.79 0.01 0.11 0.35 1.20 18.26 19.46 93.83
Ada 6–10 21.18 0.01 0.13 0.37 0.86 21.68 22.54 96.21
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Geoscienze, Geografia