[1. European Communities (EC) (1976). European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming Purposes. Strasbourg, 10.3.1976. European Treaty Series No. 87. www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/ Html/087.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Council Directive 98/58/EC of 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. OJ L 221/23 8.8.98 (July 20, 1998)]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Animal welfare and protection law (2007). OJ Republic of Macedonia 113 (September 20, 2007)]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Regulation for conditions and methods for protection of farm animals (2009). OJ Republic of Macedonia 140 (November 20, 2009)]Search in Google Scholar
[5. European Commission (2007). Attitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare. Special Eurobarometer 270. Wave 66.1. TNS Opinion and Social http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_270_en.pdf ]Search in Google Scholar
[6. European Commission (2012). Communication from the commission to the European Parlament, the council and the European economic and social committee on the European Union Strategy for the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2012-2015 (Text with EEA relevance), European Commission, Brussels, Belgium]Search in Google Scholar
[7. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) (2012). Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(6): 2767, 29.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Welfare Quality®, (2009). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands, 180.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. State Statistical Office, Skopje - News release (2014). Number of livestock, poultry and beehives in 2013. Skopje, Macedonia. www.statgov.mk]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy (2013). Annual report for agriculture and rural development, 2012. Skopje, Macedonia]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ostojić-Andrić, D., Hristov, S., Novaković, Ž., Pantelić, V., Petrović, M. M., Zlatanović, Z., Nikšić, D. (2011). Dairy cows welfare quality in loose vs tie housing system. Biotechnol Anim Husb. 27 (3): 975-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BAH1103975O10.2298/BAH1103975O]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Vučemilo, M., Matković, K., Štoković, I., Kovačević, S., Benić, M. (2012). Welfare assessment of dairy cows housed in a tie-stall system. Mljekarstvo 62 (1): 62-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Diugan, E., Niculae, M., Stefan, R., Sandru, C. (2014). The effect of the housing system on the welfare quality of dairy cows. Ital J Anim Sci. 13 (1): 2940. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.294010.4081/ijas.2014.2940]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Sandru, C.D., Stefan, R., Lazar, E. (2010). The welfare assessment of tied dairy cows in 52 small farms in north-eastern Transylvania using animal-based measurements. Slov Vet Res. 47 (3): 77-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Lazar, E.A., Hegedus, I.C. (2009). Assessment of dairy cow welfare in farms from Transylvania. Proceedings of the 44th Croatian and 4th International Symposium on Agriculture. Opatija, Croatia. 2009 Feb 16-20; 752-756.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Diugan, E. A., Spinu, M., Groza, I. S., Sandru, C. D. (2013). Dairy cows welfare quality in tie-stall housing system with or without access to exercise. Acta Vet Scand. 55 (1): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-55-43 PMid:23724804 ; PMCid:PMC367497210.1186/1751-0147-55-43]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Andersson, M., Schaar, J., Wiktorsson, H. (1984). Effects of drinking water flow rates and social rank on performance and drinking behaviour of tied-up dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci. 11, 599-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(84)90074-510.1016/0301-6226(84)90074-5]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Heath, C., Lin, C., Mullan, S., Browne, W.J., Main, D.C.J. (2014). Implementing Welfare Quality® in UK assurance schemes: evaluating the challenges. Anim Welf. 23 (1): 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.09510.7120/09627286.23.1.095]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Regula, G., Danuser, J., Spycher, B., Wechsler, B. (2004). Health and welfare of dairy cows in different husbandry systems in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med. 66 (1-4): 247-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.004 PMid:1557934610.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.00415579346]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Brenninkmeyer, C., Dippel, S., Brinkmann, J., March, S., Winckler, C., Knierim, U. (2013). Hock lesion epidemiology in cubicle housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems and countries. Prev Vet Med. 109 (3-4): 236-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.014 PMid:2317421710.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.01423174217]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Zurbrigg, K., Kelton, D., Anderson, N., Millman, S. (2005). Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario. Can Vet J. 46 (10): 902-909. PMid:16454382; PMCid:PMC1255592]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Leach, K. A., Dippel, S., Huber, J., March, S., Winckler, C., Whay, H.R. (2009). Assessing lameness in cows kept in tie-stalls. J Dairy Sci. 92(4): 1567-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1648 PMid:1930763710.3168/jds.2008-164819307637]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Cook, N. (2003). Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 223 (9): 1324-1328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.1324 PMid:1462122210.2460/javma.2003.223.132414621222]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Wells, S., Trent, A., Marsh, W., Williamson, N., Robinson, R. (1995). Some risk factors associated with clinical lameness in dairy herds in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Vet Rec. 136 (21): 537-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.136.21.537 PMid:766055710.1136/vr.136.21.5377660557]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Dippel, S., Dolezal, M., Brenninkmeyer, C., Brinkmann, J., March, S., Knierim, U., Winckler, C. (2009). Risk factors for lameness in cubicle housed Austrian Simmental dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 90 (1-2): 102-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014 PMid:1940962910.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Winckler, C., Capdeville, J., Gebresenbet, G., Hörning, B., Roiha, U., Tosi, M., Waiblinger, S. (2003). Selection of parameters for on-farm welfareassessment protocols in cattle and buffalo. Anim Welf. 12 (4): 619-624. ]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Estep, D.Q., Hetts, S., (1992). Interactions, relationships, and bonds: the conceptual basis for scientist-animal relations. In: Davis, H., Balfour, A.D. (Eds.), The Inevitable Bond-Examining Scientist- Animal Interactions (pp. 6-26). CAB International, Cambridge]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Seabrook, M.F. (1972). A study to determine the influence of the herdsmans personality on milk yield. J Agric Labour Sci. 1, 45-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Hemsworth, P.H., Coleman, G.J. (1998). Human- Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity of Intensively Farmed Animals. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Waiblinger, S., Menke, C., Coleman, G. (2002). The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stock people and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 79 (3): 195-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Waiblinger, S., Menke, C., Fölsch, D.W. (2003). Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 84 (1): 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Mattiello, S., Klotz, C., Baroli, D., Minero, M., Ferrante, V., Canali, E. (2009). Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Ital J Anim Sci. 8 (2s): 628-630. ]Search in Google Scholar