Volume 57 (2022): Issue s1 (December 2022) Proceedings of the Second Earth Orientation Parameters Prediction Comparison Campaign (2nd EOP PCC) Workshop, online, February 15-16, 2022
Volume 57 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)
Volume 56 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
Volume 56 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)
Volume 56 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)
Volume 56 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)
Volume 55 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)
Volume 55 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
Volume 55 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)
Volume 55 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
Volume 54 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)
Volume 54 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
Volume 54 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)
Volume 54 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)
Volume 53 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)
Volume 53 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
Volume 53 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)
Volume 53 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
Volume 52 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)
Volume 52 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)
Volume 52 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)
Volume 52 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)
Volume 51 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)
Volume 51 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)
Volume 51 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Volume 51 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
Volume 50 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Volume 50 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)
Volume 50 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
Volume 50 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)
Volume 49 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
Volume 49 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)
Volume 49 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
Volume 49 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)
Volume 48 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)
Volume 48 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)
Volume 48 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)
Volume 48 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)
Volume 47 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
Volume 47 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)
Volume 47 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
Volume 47 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)
Volume 46 (2011): Issue 4 (December 2011) Proceedings of the Conference on "Satelitarne metody wyznaczania pozycji we wspólczesnej geodezji i nawigacji" held in Wroclaw, Poland, June 2-4, 2011 - Part II
Volume 46 (2011): Issue 3 (September 2011) Proceedings of the Conference on "Satelitarne metody wyznaczania pozycji we wspólczesnej geodezji i nawigacji" held in Wroclaw, Poland, June 2-4, 2011 - Part I
Volume 46 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)
Volume 46 (2011): Issue 1 (March 2011)
Volume 45 (2010): Issue 4 (December 2010)
Volume 45 (2010): Issue 3 (September 2010)
Volume 45 (2010): Issue 2 (June 2010) Proceedings of the IERS Workshop on EOP Combination and Prediction, Warsaw, 19-21 October 2009
GLONASS, successfully operating during 1990s became unusable by early 2000s. Following a revitalization and modernization plan since 2004, GLONASS constellation has been completed again by the end of 2011 and the use of GLONASS is gaining popularity. Because of the previous experience, some scepticism exists among the stakeholders in using GLONASS for reliable solution and application development. This paper critically reviews the operational lifespan of GLONASS satellites launched between 2004 and 2016, as this is an important contributor towards reliability and sustained operation of the system. For popularization and extracting full benefits of GLONASS as stand-alone system or as an active component of multi-GNSS, major issues of assuring the minimum sufficient GLONASS constellation (of 24…23 satellites), efficient design implementation and the modernized ground control segment development and operation need to be properly taken care of by the system operators.
Published Online: 27 Dec 2017 Page range: 99 - 108
Abstract
Abstract
Each GNSS constellation operates its own system times; namely, GPS system time (GPST), GLONASS system time (GLONASST), BeiDou system time (BDT) and Galileo system time (GST). They could be traced back to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) scale and are aligned to GPST. This paper estimates the receiver clock offsets to three timescales: GPST, GLONASST and BDT. The two measurement scenarios use two identical multi-GNSS geodetic receivers connected to the same geodetic antenna through a splitter. One receiver is driven by its internal oscillators and another receiver is connected to the external frequency oscillators, caesium frequency standard, kept as the Thailand standard time scale at the National Institute of Metrology (Thailand) called UTC(NIMT). The three weeks data are observed at 30 seconds sample rate. The receiver clock offsets with respected to the three system time are estimated and analysed through the geodetic technique of static Precise Point Positioning (PPP) using a data processing software developed by Wuhan University - Positioning And Navigation Data Analyst (PANDA) software. The estimated receiver clock offsets are around 32, 33 and 18 nanoseconds from GPST, GLONASST and BDT respectively. This experiment is initially stated that each timescale is inter-operated with GPST and further measurements on receiver internal delay has to be determined for clock comparisons especially the high accuracy clock at timing laboratories.
Published Online: 27 Dec 2017 Page range: 109 - 120
Abstract
Abstract
The European Geostationary Overlay Service (EGNOS) augments Global Positioning System (GPS) by providing correction data and integrity information for improving positioning over Europe. EGNOS Service Performance Monitoring Support (SPMS) project has assumed establishment, maintenance and implementation of an EGNOS performance monitoring network.
The paper presents preliminary results of analyses prepared in Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw), as one of partners in SPMS project.
GLONASS, successfully operating during 1990s became unusable by early 2000s. Following a revitalization and modernization plan since 2004, GLONASS constellation has been completed again by the end of 2011 and the use of GLONASS is gaining popularity. Because of the previous experience, some scepticism exists among the stakeholders in using GLONASS for reliable solution and application development. This paper critically reviews the operational lifespan of GLONASS satellites launched between 2004 and 2016, as this is an important contributor towards reliability and sustained operation of the system. For popularization and extracting full benefits of GLONASS as stand-alone system or as an active component of multi-GNSS, major issues of assuring the minimum sufficient GLONASS constellation (of 24…23 satellites), efficient design implementation and the modernized ground control segment development and operation need to be properly taken care of by the system operators.
Each GNSS constellation operates its own system times; namely, GPS system time (GPST), GLONASS system time (GLONASST), BeiDou system time (BDT) and Galileo system time (GST). They could be traced back to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) scale and are aligned to GPST. This paper estimates the receiver clock offsets to three timescales: GPST, GLONASST and BDT. The two measurement scenarios use two identical multi-GNSS geodetic receivers connected to the same geodetic antenna through a splitter. One receiver is driven by its internal oscillators and another receiver is connected to the external frequency oscillators, caesium frequency standard, kept as the Thailand standard time scale at the National Institute of Metrology (Thailand) called UTC(NIMT). The three weeks data are observed at 30 seconds sample rate. The receiver clock offsets with respected to the three system time are estimated and analysed through the geodetic technique of static Precise Point Positioning (PPP) using a data processing software developed by Wuhan University - Positioning And Navigation Data Analyst (PANDA) software. The estimated receiver clock offsets are around 32, 33 and 18 nanoseconds from GPST, GLONASST and BDT respectively. This experiment is initially stated that each timescale is inter-operated with GPST and further measurements on receiver internal delay has to be determined for clock comparisons especially the high accuracy clock at timing laboratories.
The European Geostationary Overlay Service (EGNOS) augments Global Positioning System (GPS) by providing correction data and integrity information for improving positioning over Europe. EGNOS Service Performance Monitoring Support (SPMS) project has assumed establishment, maintenance and implementation of an EGNOS performance monitoring network.
The paper presents preliminary results of analyses prepared in Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw), as one of partners in SPMS project.