[
Abul-Fottouh, D. (2018). Brokerage roles and strategic positions in Twitter networks of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. Policy & Internet, 10(2), 218-240. doi:10.1002/poi3.169.10.1002/poi3.169
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alpert, J. M., & Womble, F. E. (2016). Just what the doctor tweeted: Physicians’ challenges and rewards of using Twitter. Health Communication, 31(7), 824-832. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1007551.10.1080/10410236.2015.1007551
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram. Paper presented at the CHI 2014, Toronto, ON, pp. 965-974. Retrieved from http://eegilbert.org/papers/chi14.faces.bakhshi.pdf10.1145/2556288.2557403
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakry, A., & Alkazemi, M. F. (2016). Social media coverage of “Maspero”: Solidarity between Muslims and Christians post the Egyptian uprising. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 16(3), 61-72. doi:10.21018/rjcpr.2014.3.176.10.21018/rjcpr.2014.3.176
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borra, E., & Rieder, B. (2014). Programmed method: Developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 16(3), 262-278. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094.10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4-17. doi:10.1111/amet.12112.10.1111/amet.12112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, (pp. 39-58). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011, University of Iceland, Reykjavik. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/66324/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2013). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann, (Eds.) Twitter and Society (pp. 15–28). New York: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaudhry, A., Glodé, L. M., Gillman, M., & Miller, R. S. (2012). Trends in Twitter use by physicians at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. Journal of Oncology Practice, 8(3), 173-178. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000483.10.1200/JOP.2011.000483
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damsgaard, D. (2019). Professor i ensomhed: Læger er den mindste solidariske faggrupper, jeg kender [Professor of loneliness: Doctors are the least solidaric professional group I know]. Ugeskriftet 20/2019. Retrieved from https://ugeskriftet.dk/nyhed/professor-i-ensomhed-laeger-er-en-af-de-mindst-solidariske-faggrupper-jeg-kender
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Cock, B., & Pizarro Pedraza, A. (2018). From expressing solidarity to mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic functions of hashtags starting with #jesuis across languages. Language in Society, 47(2), 197-217. doi:10.1017/S0047404518000052.10.1017/S0047404518000052
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dreyfus, H. L. (2001). On the internet. Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Du, J., Xu, J., Song, H.-Y., & Tao, C. (2017). Leveraging machine learning-based approaches to assess human papillomavirus vaccination sentiment trends with Twitter data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(2), 69. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0469-6.10.1186/s12911-017-0469-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fitton, L., Gruen, M., & Poston, L. (2009). Twitter for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fusaroli, R., Perlman, M., Mislove, A., Paxton, A., Matlock, T., & Dale, R. (2015). Timescales of massive human entrainment. PloS one, 10(4). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122742.10.1371/journal.pone.0122742
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fyens Stiftstidende (2018). Sprognævn kårer kvindelandsholdet til årets ord [The Danish Language Council elects the women’s national team as the word of the year]. Retrieved from https://fyens.dk/artikel/sprognævn-kårer-kvindelandsholdet-til-årets-ord-2018-1-19(8).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gagnon, K. (2015). Using Twitter in health professional education: A case study. Journal of Allied Health, 44(1), 25-33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffiths, P. (2006). An introduction to English semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294-1318. doi:10.1177/0002764211409378.10.1177/0002764211409378
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J. (1989). Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning “stage 6”. The Philosophical Forum, 21(1), 32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hemsley, J., Stromer-Galley, J., Semaan, B., & Tanupabrungsun, S. (2018). Tweeting to the target: Candidates’ use of strategic messages and @mentions on Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(1), 3-18. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2017.1338634.10.1080/19331681.2017.1338634
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hopke, J. E. (2015). Hashtagging politics: Transnational anti-fracking movement Twitter practices. Social Media & Society, 1(2), 1-12. doi:10.1177/2056305115605521.10.1177/2056305115605521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hougaard, T. T. (2018). Emotionelle appeller i aktivistiske hashtags: Om# jegharoplevet and# detkuhaværetmig [Emotional Appeals in the Danish Activist Hashtags #jegharoplevet (ihaveexperienced) and #detkuhaværetmig (itcouldhavebeenme)], Rhetorica Scandinavica, 1(78), 99-109.10.52610/PMNJ1263
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Højesteret [Danish Supreme Court] (2018). Læge frifundet [Doctor acquitted]. Retrieved from http://www.hoejesteret.dk/hoejesteret/nyheder/Afgorelser/Pages/Laegefrifundet.aspx
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunt, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (2007). Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 433-457). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ince, J., Rojas, F., & Davis, C. A. (2017). The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1814-1830. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931.10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johansson, M., Kyröläinen, A.-J., Ginter, F., Lehti, L., Krizsán, A., & Laippala, V. (2018). Opening up #jesuisCharlie anatomy of a Twitter discussion with mixed methods. Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 90-101. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.007.10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jungherr, A., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Through a glass, darkly: Tactical support and symbolic association in Twitter messages commenting on Stuttgart 21. Social Science Computer Review, 32(1), 74-89. doi:10.1177/0894439313500022.10.1177/0894439313500022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolers, A. (2016). A moral theory of solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769781.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koteyko, N., & Atanasova, D. (2018). Mental health advocacy on Twitter: Positioning in Depression Awareness Week tweets. Discourse, Context & Media, 25, 52-59. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.007.10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laitinen, A., & Pessi, A. B. (2015). Solidarity: Theory and practice. An introduction. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice, (pp.1-20). Lanham: Lexington Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margolin, D., & Liao, W. (2018). The emotional antecedents of solidarity in social media crowds. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3700-3719. doi:10.1177/1461444818758702.10.1177/1461444818758702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
May, L. (1996). The socially responsive self: Social theory and professional ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murthy, D. (2018). Twitter (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nakhasi, A., Bell, S. G., Passarella, R. J., Paul, M. J., Dredze, M., & Pronovost, P. J. (2019). The potential of Twitter as a data s ource for patient safety. Journal of Patient Safety 15(4), 32-53. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000253.10.1097/PTS.0000000000000253
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Narayan, B. (2013). From everyday information behaviours to clickable solidarity in a place called social media. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5(3), 32-53. doi: 10.5130/ccs.v5i3.3488.10.5130/ccs.v5i3.3488
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nielsen, F. Å. (2011). A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1103.2903, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. London: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266-282. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prabhu, V., Lee, T., Loeb, S., Holmes, J. H., Gold, H. T., Lepor, H., ... & Makarov, D. V. (2015). Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. BJU International, 116(1), 65-71. doi: 10.1111/bju.12748.10.1111/bju.12748
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reagan, A.J., Danforth, C.M., Tivnan, B., & Dodds, C.S. (2017). Sentiment analysis methods for understanding large-scale t exts: A case for using continuum-scored words and word shift graphs. EPJ Data Science, 6(28). doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0121-9.10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0121-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scholz, S. J. (2008). Political solidarity. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, N. H. (2015). Solidarity and work: A reassessment. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 119-134). Lanham: Lexington Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stocchetti, M. (2019). Selfie and interpellation – A preliminary study of the role of ideology in the social construction of reality, self and society in the digital age. KOME − An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry. doi:10.17646/KOME.75672.37.10.17646/KOME.75672.37
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomson, T. J., & Greenwood, K. (2017). I “like” that: Exploring the characteristics that promote social media engagement with news photographs. Visual Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 203-218. doi: 10.1080/15551393.2017.1388701.10.1080/15551393.2017.1388701
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, J. H. (2007). Human emotions: A sociological theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788-806. doi:10.1177/1461444810385097.10.1177/1461444810385097
]Search in Google Scholar