[
Amit, V. (2002). An Anthropology Without Community? In Vered Amit and Nigel Rapport (Eds.). The Trouble with Community. Anthropological reflections on Movement, Identity and Collectivity (pp. 13-70). London: Pluto press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. London and New York: Verso.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bessire, L. & Bond, D. (2014). Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist 41(3), 440-456.10.1111/amet.12083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology.10.3362/9781780440453
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chari, S. & Donner, H. (2010). Ethnographies of Activism: A critical Introduction. Ethnography and Activism: Oxymoron or Opportunity? Cultural Dynamics 22(2), 75-85.10.1177/0921374010380887
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ciavolella, R. & Boni, S. (2015). Aspiring to alterpolitics. Anthropology, radical theory, and social movements. Focaal - Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 72, 3-8.10.3167/fcl.2015.720101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520946286
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation - the New Tyranny? London and New York: Zed Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Craven, C. & Davis, D. (2013). Feminist Activist Ethnography: Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America. New York: Lexington Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crewe, E. & Axelby, R. (2013). Anthropology and Development: Culture, Morality and Politics in a Globalised World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, D. (2006). Knowledge in the Service of a Vision. Politically Engaged Anthropology. In V. Sanford & A. Angel-Ajani (Eds.). Engaged Observer. Anthropology, Advocacy and Activism (pp. 228-238). New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, D. (2013). Border Crossings: Intimacy and Feminist Activist Ethnography in the Age of Neoliberalism. In Craven, C. & Davis, D. (Eds). Feminist Activist Ethnography: Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America (pp. 23-38). Lanham: Lexington.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dyrness, A. (2008). Research for Change versus Research as Change: Lessons from a mujerista participatory Research Team. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 39(1), 23-44.10.1111/j.1548-1492.2008.00003.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eriksen, T. H. (2014). Public Anthropology. In H. Russell Bernard & Clarence C. Gravlee (Eds.). Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology (pp. 719-734). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graeber, D. (2013). The Democracy Project: a History, a Crisis, a Movement. Penguin Books Ltd
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grosz, E. (1985). Criticism, feminism and the institution. An interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Thesis Eleven 10/11, 175–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hage, G. (2012). Critical anthropological thought and the radical political imaginary today. Critique of Anthropology 32(3), 285-308.10.1177/0308275X12449105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hale, C. R. (2006). Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology 21(1), 96-120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hale, C. R. (2008). Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hart, K. (2015). Cultural Critique, Anthropological. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, volume 5, 382-387.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.12046-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. (2004). Participation - From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London & New York: Zed Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hodgson, D. (2011). Being Maasai, Becoming Indigenous: Postcolonial Politics in a Neoliberal World. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holbraad, M. & Pedersen, M. A. (2017). The Ontological Turn - An Anthropological Exposition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316218907
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Juris, J. S. & Khasnabish, A. (2013). Insurgent encounters: transnational activism, ethnography, and the political. Duke University Press10.1515/9780822395867
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kesby, M. (2005). Retheorizing Empowerment-through-Participation as a Performance in Space: Beyond Tyranny to Transformation. Signs 30(4), 2037-2065.10.1086/428422
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirsch, S. (2002). Anthropology and Advocacy. A Case Study of the Campaign against the Ok Tedi Mine. Critique of Anthropology 22(2), 175-200.10.1177/03075X02022002851
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewin, E. (2006). Introduction. Feminist Anthropology: A Reader. In E. Lewin (ed.) Feminist Anthropology: A Reader (pp. 1-38). Malden, Oxford and Victoria: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Low, S. M. & Merry, S. E. (2010). Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: An Introduction to Supplement 2. Current Anthropology 51(S2), S203-S226.10.1086/653837
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through Thick & Thin. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcus, G. E. & Fischer, M. M. J. (1999 [1986]). Anthropology as Cultural Critique. An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Second ed. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mascia-Lees, F. E., Sharpe, P. & Cohen, C. B. (1989). The postmodernist turn in anthropology: Cautions from a feminist per spective. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 15(1), 7-33.10.1086/494562
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayoux, L. (1995). Beyond Naivety: Women, Gender Inequality and Participatory Development. Development and Change 26(2), 235–258.10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00551.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mosse, D. (2013). The Anthropology of International Development. Annual Review of Anthropology 42, 227–46.10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155553
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortner, S. B. 2016. Dark anthropology and its others. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1), 47–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osterweil, M. (2016). “Collaboration: Translation.” Correspondences, Cultural Anthropology website, October 2, 2016. Retrieved 20 December 2017 from https://culanth.org/fieldsights/963-collaboration-translation
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pande, R. (2017). Strategic essentialism. In D. Richardson et al. (eds). The International Encyclopedia of Geography (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons, ltd.10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1170
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pels, P. (1999). Professions of Duplexity. Current Anthropology 40(2), 101–115.10.1086/200001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pink, S. (2006). Applications of Anthropology. Professional Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Povinelli, E. A. (2001). Radical Worlds: The Anthropology of Incommensurability and Inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology 30, 319-34.10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.319
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rylko-Bauer, B., Singer, M. & Van Willigen, J. (2006). Reclaiming Applied Anthropology: Its Past, Present, and Future. American Anthropologist 108(1), 178-190.10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schensul, S. L., Schensul, J. J., Singer, M., Weeks, M. & Brault, M. (2014). Participatory Methods and Community-Based Collaborations. In Bernard, H. R. & Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.) Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Second edition (pp. 185-214). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schensul, J. J. & Trickett, E. (2009). Introduction to Multi-Level Community Based Culturally Situated Interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(3–4), 232–240.10.1007/s10464-009-9238-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology 36(3), 409-440.10.1086/204378
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schrock, R. D. (2013). The Methodological Imperatives of Feminist Ethnography. Journal of Feminist Scholarship 5, 48-60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schultz, K. (2014). What Does it Mean to be an Activist Scholar? Re-Imagining Our responses as Anthropologists of Education to Contemporary Challenges. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 45(3), 219-230.10.1111/aeq.12063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shear, B. & Burke, B. (2013). Beyond critique: Anthropology of and for non-capitalism. Anthropology News 54 (January/ February), 17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Speed, S. (2006). At the Crossroads of Human Rights and Anthropology: Toward a Critically engaged Activist Research. American Anthropologist 108(1), 66-76.10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.66
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’s Studies Int. Forum. 11(1), 21-27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Urla, J. & Helepololei, J. (2014). The Ethnography of Resistance Then and Now: On Thickness and Activist Engagement in the Twenty-First Century. History and Anthropology, 25(4), 431–451.10.1080/02757206.2014.930456
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Venkatesan, S. & Yarrow, T. (2012). Differentiating development: beyond an anthropology of critique. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
]Search in Google Scholar