Accès libre

Investigating the utility of cognitive interview mnemonics among non-native English speakers

À propos de cet article

Citez

Alm, C., Helmy Rehnberg, N., & Lindholm, T. (2019). Language and eyewitness suggestibility. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 16(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1529 Search in Google Scholar

Ardila, A. (2003). Language representation and working memory with bilinguals. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00022-4 Search in Google Scholar

Bearman, M., Brubacher, S. P., Timms, L., & Powell, M. (2019). Trial of three investigative interview techniques with minimally verbal adults reporting about occurrences of a staged repeated event. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(4), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000206 Search in Google Scholar

Boduch‐Grabka, K., & Lev‐Ari, S. (2021). Exposing individuals to foreign accent increases their trust in what nonnative speakers say. Cognitive Science, 45(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13064 Search in Google Scholar

Boon, J., & Noon, E. (1994). Changing perspectives in cognitive interviewing. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169408411936 Search in Google Scholar

Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 Search in Google Scholar

Dando, C., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). The cognitive interview: Inexperienced police officers’ perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X162498 Search in Google Scholar

Davis, M. R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1048 Search in Google Scholar

Evans, J. R., & Michael, S. W. (2014). Detecting deception in non-native English speakers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2990 Search in Google Scholar

Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Jo, E., & Fisher, R. P. (2016). The effect of interpreters on eliciting information, cues to deceit and rapport. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12067 Search in Google Scholar

Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Jo, E., Shaboltas, A., Ivanova, M., Granskaya, J., & Houston, K. (2016). Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit from native speakers, non-native speakers and those talking through an interpreter. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3270 Search in Google Scholar

Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2016). Using the reverse order technique with non-native speakers or through an interpreter: Reverse order technique using foreign speakers or with an interpreter. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3196 Search in Google Scholar

Filipović, L. (2011). Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 466–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911403062 Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, R. P., Compo, N. S., Rivard, J., & Hirn, D. (2014). Interviewing Witnesses. In T. Perfect & D. S. Lindsay, The SAGE handbook of applied memory (pp. 559–578). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294703.n31 Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher. Search in Google Scholar

Foucart, A., Costa, A., Morís‐Fernández, L., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). Foreignness or processing fluency? On understanding the negative bias toward foreign‐accented speakers. Language Learning, 70(4), 974–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12413 Search in Google Scholar

Frumkin, L. (2007). Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600822246 Search in Google Scholar

Frumkin, L., & Stone, A. (2020). Not all eyewitnesses are equal: Accent status, race and age interact to influence evaluations of testimony. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 18(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2020.1727806 Search in Google Scholar

Frumkin, L., & Thompson, A. (2020). Impact of British accents on perceptions of eyewitness statements. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 4(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.39368 Search in Google Scholar

Geiselman, R. E., & Callot, R. (1990). Reverse versus forward recall of scriptbased texts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040206 Search in Google Scholar

Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1986). Enhancement of eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. The American Journal of Psychology, 99(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422492 Search in Google Scholar

Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359590 Search in Google Scholar

Gostjev, F. A., & Nielsen, A. L. (2017). Speaking the same language? English language fluency and violent crime at the neighborhood level. The Sociological Quarterly, 58(1), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2016.1246901 Search in Google Scholar

Hanzlíková, D., & Skarnitzl, R. (2017). Credibility of native and non-native speakers of English revisited: Do non-native listeners feel the same? Research in Language, 15(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2017-0016 Search in Google Scholar

Hatch, E. M. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hope, L., Mullis, R., & Gabbert, F. (2013). Who? What? When? Using a timeline technique to facilitate recall of a complex event. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.002 Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, X., Gossack-Keenan, K., & Pell, M. D. (2020). To believe or not to believe? How voice and accent information in speech alter listener impressions of trust. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819865833 Search in Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1–2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414996 Search in Google Scholar

Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1–2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414991 Search in Google Scholar

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & Curley, J. (1988). Lexical memory in novice bilinguals: The role of concepts in retrieving second language words. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 2, pp. 389-395). John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267 Search in Google Scholar

Leach, A.-M., Snellings, R. L., & Gazaille, M. (2017). Observers’ language proficiencies and the detection of non-native speakers’ deception: Observer proficiency and deception detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(2), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3322 Search in Google Scholar

Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025 Search in Google Scholar

Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X. (2019). Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153 Search in Google Scholar

Macintyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x Search in Google Scholar

Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview: A metaTHE analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518 Search in Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2002). Back to basics: A componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(7), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.825 Search in Google Scholar

Paulo, R. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2013). The enhanced cognitive interview: Towards a better use and understanding of this procedure. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 15(3), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2013.15.3.311 Search in Google Scholar

Rivera, R., & Zraick, K. (2010, November 18). Audit says police fall short in providing interpreters. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/19/nyregion/19translate.html Search in Google Scholar

Russo, M., Islam, G., & Koyuncu, B. (2017). Non-native accents and stigma: How self-fulfilling prophesies can affect career outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.001 Search in Google Scholar

Schreiber Compo, N., Hyman Gregory, A., & Fisher, R. (2012). Interviewing behaviors in police investigators: A field study of a current US sample. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.494604 Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer, S. A., & Evans, J. R. (2018). Interpreters in law enforcement contexts: Practices and experiences according to investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3388 Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, J. S., Garcia, L. A., & Robles, B. E. (1997). Cross-language postevent misinformation effects in Spanish–English bilingual witnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.889 Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 Search in Google Scholar

Southall, A. (2017, May 25). Police must tackle language barrier in domestic abuse cases. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/25/nyregion/police-tackle-language-barrier-in-domestic-abuse-cases.html Search in Google Scholar

Turkewitz, J. (2014, May 11). Language barrier continues to thwart victims of crimes. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/12/nyregion/language-barrier-continues-to-thwart-victims-of-crimes.html Search in Google Scholar

Vrij, A. (2019). Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3457 Search in Google Scholar

Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(6), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.515987 Search in Google Scholar

Wakefield, S. J., Kebbell, M. R., Moston, S., & Westera, N. (2015). Perceptions and profiles of interviews with interpreters: A police survey. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865814524583 Search in Google Scholar

Wegener, D. T., Fabrigar, L. R., Pek, J., & Hoisington-Shaw, K. (2022). Evaluating research in personality and social psychology: Considerations of statistical power and concerns about false findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(7), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211030811 Search in Google Scholar

Wells, G. L., Kovera, M. B., Douglass, A. B., Brewer, N., Meissner, C. A., & Wixted, J. T. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000359 Search in Google Scholar

Zeigler, K., & Camarota, S. A. (2019, October 29). 67.3 million in the United States spoke a foreign language at home in 2018. Center for Immigration Studies. https://cis.org/Report/673-Million-United-States-Spoke-Foreign-Language-Home-2018 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology