Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in acute pancreatitis

1. Steinberg W, Tenner S. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:1198-210.10.1056/NEJM199404283301706Search in Google Scholar

2. Casas JD, Diaz R, Valderas G, Mariscal A, Cuadras P. Prognostic value of CT in the early assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182:569-74.10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820569Search in Google Scholar

3. Piironen A. Severe acute pancreatitis: contrastenhanced CT and MRI features. Abdom Imaging. 2001; 26:225-33.10.1007/s002610000153Search in Google Scholar

4. Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW. Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg. 1990; 77:1260-4.10.1002/bjs.1800771120Search in Google Scholar

5. Corfield AP, Cooper MJ, Williamson RC, Mayer AD, McMahon MJ, Dickson AP, et al. Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices. Lancet. 1985; 2:403-7.10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92733-3Search in Google Scholar

6. Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, Megibow AJ, Caccavale R, Cooper MM. Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology. 1985; 156:767-72.10.1148/radiology.156.3.4023241Search in Google Scholar

7. Larvin M, Chalmers AG, McMahon MJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography: a precise technique for identifying and localising pancreatic necrosis. BMJ. 1990; 300:1425-8.10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1425Search in Google Scholar

8. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990; 174:331-6.10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296641Search in Google Scholar

9. Simchuk EJ, Traverso LW, Nukui Y, Kozarek RA. Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 2000; 179:352-5.10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00375-5Search in Google Scholar

10. Leung TK, Lee CM, Lin SY, Chen HC, Wang HJ, Shen LK, et al. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:6049-52.10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049Search in Google Scholar

11. De Sanctis JT, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, Halpern EF, Saini S, et al. Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs APACHE II. Clin Radiol. 1997; 52:842-8.10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80079-7Search in Google Scholar

12. van den Biezenbos AR, Kruyt PM, Bosscha K, van Leeuwen MS, Feldberg MA, van der Schouw YT, et al. Added value of CT criteria compared to the clinical SAP score in patients with acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging. 1998; 23:622-6.10.1007/s002619900417Search in Google Scholar

13. Hwang TL, Chang KY, Ho YP. Contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography does not aggravate the clinical severity of patients with severe acute pancreatitis: reevaluation of the effect of intravenous contrast medium on the severity of acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 2000; 135:287-90.10.1001/archsurg.135.3.287Search in Google Scholar

14. Wang YX, Chen S, Morcos SK. Contrast-enhanced CT in acute pancreatitis. Br J Radiol. 1999; 72:1029.10.1259/bjr.72.862.10673959Search in Google Scholar

15. Bradley EL, 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993; 128:586-90. 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170122019Search in Google Scholar