Effects of skeletal muscle denervation on potency of rocuronium

1. Hogue CW Jr, Itani MS, Martyn JA. Resistance to d-tubocurarine in lower motor neuron injury is related to increased acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73: 703-9.10.1097/00000542-199010000-00016Search in Google Scholar

2. Ibebunjo C, Martyn JA. Thermal injury induces greater resistance to d-Tubocurarine in local rather than in distant muscles in the rat. Anesth Analg . 2000; 91:1243-9.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gu Y, Hall ZW. Characterization of acetylcholine receptor subunits in developing and in denervated mammalian muscle. J Biol Chem. 1988; 263:12878-85.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37643-9Search in Google Scholar

4. Ma J, Shen J, Garrett JP, Lee CA, Li Z, Elsaidi GA, Ritting A, et al. Gene expression of myogenic regulatory factors, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits, and GAP-43 in skeletal muscle following denervation in a rat model. J Orthop Res. 2007; 25: 1498-505.10.1002/jor.20414Search in Google Scholar

5. Nosek MT, Martyn JA. Na+ channel and acetylcholine receptor changes in muscle at sites distant from burns do not simulate denervation. J Appl Physiol. 1997; 82: 1333-9.10.1152/jappl.1997.82.4.1333Search in Google Scholar

6. Ibebunjo C, Martyn JA. Thermal injury induces greater resistance to d-Tubocurarine in local rather than in distant muscles in the rat. Anesth Analg. 2000; 91:1243-9.Search in Google Scholar

7. Adams L, Carlson BM, Henderson L, Goldman D. Adaptation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, myogenin, and MRF4 gene expression to long-term muscle denervation. J Cell Biol. 1995; 131:1341-9.10.1083/jcb.131.5.1341Search in Google Scholar

8. Wagatsuma A, Osawa T. Time course of changes in angiogenesis-related factors in denervated muscle. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2006; 187: 503-9.10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01594.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Magnusson C, Hogklint L, Libelius R, Tagerud S. Expression of mRNA for plasminogen activators and protease nexin-1 in innervated and denervated mouse skeletal muscle. J Neurosci Res 2001; 66: 457-6310.1002/jnr.10000Search in Google Scholar

10. Kuffler SW, Yoshikami D. The number of transmitter molecules in a quantum: an estimate from iontophoretic application of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular synapse. J Physiol. 1975; 251:465-82.10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011103Search in Google Scholar

11. Paul M, Kindler CH, Fokt RM, Dresser MJ, Dipp NC, Yost CS. The potency of new muscle relaxants on recombinant muscle-type acetylcholine receptors. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94:597-603.10.1097/00000539-200203000-00022Search in Google Scholar

12. Sine SM, Claudio T. Gamma- and delta-subunits regulate the affinity and the cooperativity of ligand binding to the acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem. 1991; 266:19369-77.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55007-9Search in Google Scholar

13. Garland CM, Foreman RC, Chad JE, Hold-Dye L, Walker RJ. The actions of muscle relaxants at nicotinic acetylcholine receptor isoforms. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988; 357:83-92.10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00542-1Search in Google Scholar

14. Fletcher GH, Steinbach JH. Ability of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs to act as partial agonists at fetal and adult mouse muscle nicotinic receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1996; 49:938-47.Search in Google Scholar

15. Han T, Kim H, Bae J, Kim K, Martyn JA. Neuromuscular pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in patients with major burns. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99:386-92.10.1213/01.ANE.0000129992.07527.4B15271712Search in Google Scholar

16. Martyn JA, White DA, Gronert GA, Jaffe RS, Ward JM. Up-and-down regulation of skeletal muscle acetylcholine receptors: effects on neuromuscular blockers. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76:822-43.10.1097/00000542-199205000-000221575351Search in Google Scholar

17. Ibebunjo C, Martyn J. Disparate dysfunction of skeletal muscles located near and distant from burn site in the rat. Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24:1283-94.10.1002/mus.114611562907Search in Google Scholar

18. Tsay HJ, Schmidt J. Skeletal muscle denervation activates acetylcholine receptor genes. J Cell Biol. 1989; 108:1523-6.10.1083/jcb.108.4.152321155062925794Search in Google Scholar