Study on friction behavior at the interface between prosthetic socket and liner

[1] Baars E.C.T., Geertzen J.H., Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in transtibial prostheses, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 2005, 29 (1), 27–37. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bourell D., Montgomery J.T., Vaughan M.R., Crawford R.H., Design of an actively actuated prosthetic socket, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2010, 16 (3), 194–201. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cagle J.C., Reinhall P.G., Allyn K.J., McLean J., Hinrichs P., Hafner B.J., Sanders J.E., A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 2018, 56, 1227–1240. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cavaco A., Durães L., Pais S., Ramalho A., Friction of prosthetic interfaces used by transtibial amputees, Biotribology, 2016, 6, 36–41. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Emrich R., Slater K., Comparative analysis of below-knee prosthetic socket liner materials, Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 1998, 22 (2), 94–98. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Feng Q.P., Li W., Liu X.D., Ji W., Zhou Z.R., Investigation of reciprocating friction characteristics between different bionic surfaces of prosthesis materials and skin, Biosurface and Biotribology, 2019, 5 (2), 57–66. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Florence M.M., Andrew J.C., Joshua W.S., Dickinson A.S., Predictive control for an active prosthetic socket informed by FEA-based tissue damage risk estimation, 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Jia X.H., Zhang M., Li X.B., Lee W.C.C., A quasi-dynamic nonlinear finite element model to investigate prosthetic interface stresses during walking for trans-tibial amputees, Clinical Biomechanics, 2005, 20, 630–635. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kejlaa G.H., Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 2009, 17 (3), 157–163. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kong M., Li W., Li H.L., Liu X.D., Zhou Z.R., The skin frictional properties of 4 kinds of commonly used prosthetic materials, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2008, 25 (5), 1107–1111, 1125. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lee W.C.C., Zhang M., Jia X.H., Cheunga J.T.M., Finite element modeling of the contact interface between transtibial residual limb and prosthetic socket, Medical Engineering and Physics, 2004, 26 (8), 655–662. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Li W., Kong M., Liu X.D., Zhou Z.R., Tribological behavior of scar skin and prosthetic skin in vivo, Tribology International, 2008, 41 (7), 640–647. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Li W., Liu X.D., Cai Z.B., Zheng J., Zhou Z.R., Effect of prosthetic socks on the frictional properties of residual limb skin, Wear, 2011, 271 (11–12), 2804–2811. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Li W., Qu S.X., Zhou Z.R., Reciprocating sliding behaviour of human skinin vivoat lower number of cycles, Tribology Letters, 2006, 23 (2), 165–170. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Li W., Shi L., Deng H.Y., Zhou Z.R., Investigation on friction trauma of small intestine in vivo under reciprocal sliding conditions, Tribology Letters, 2014, 55 (2), 261–270. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lin C.C., Chang C.H., Wu C.L., Chung K.C., Liao I.C., Effects of liner stiffness for trans-tibial prosthesis: a finite element contact model, 2004, 26 (1), 1–9. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Millstein S.G., Heger H., Hunter G.A., Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: A comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 2009, 10 (1), 27–34. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Omasta M., David P., Návrat T., Rosický J., Finite element analysis for the evaluation of the structural behaviour, of a prosthesis for trans-tibial amputees, Medical Engineering and Physics, 2012, 34 (1), 38–45. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Pohjolainen T., Alaranta H., Kärkkäinen M., Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 1990, 14 (2), 75–79. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Wang A., Lin R., Stark C., Dumbleton J.H., Suitability and limitations of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites as bearing surfaces for total joint replacements, Wear, 1999, 225–229 (4), 724–727. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zhang M., Lord M., Turner-Smith A.R., Roberts V.C., Development of a non-linear finite element modelling of the below-knee prosthetic socket interface, Medical Engineering & Physics, 1995, 17 (8), 559–566. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zhang M., Roberts C., Comparison of computational analysis with clinical measurement of stresses on below-knee residual limb in a prosthetic socket, Medical Engineering and Physics, 2000, 22 (9), 607–612. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhang M., Turner-Smith A.R., Roberts V.C., Tanner A., Frictional action at lower limb/prosthetic socket interface, Medical Engineering & Physics, 1996, 18 (3), 207–214. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zhao G., Hussainova I., Antonov M., Wang Q.H., Wang T.M., Friction and wear of fiber reinforced polyimide composites, Wear, 2013, 301 (1–2), 122–129. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Zheng S.X., Zhao W., Lu B., Three dimensional finite dynamic analysis of the residual limb and prosthetic socket, Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2006, 40 (7), 807. Search in Google Scholar