[Alcalde, C., Burusco, A., Díaz-Moreno, J.C. and Medina, J. (2017). Fuzzy concept lattices and fuzzy relation equations in the retrieval processing of images and signals, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems25(Supplement-1): 99–120.10.1142/s0218488517400050]Search in Google Scholar
[Benítez-Caballero, M.J., Medina, J., Ramírez-Poussa, E. and Ślęzak, D. (2020). A computational procedure for variable selection preserving different initial conditions, International Journal of Computer Mathematics97(1–2): 387–404.10.1080/00207160.2019.1613530]Search in Google Scholar
[Birkhoff, G. (1967). Lattice Theory, 3rd Edn, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloch, I. (2000). On links between mathematical morphology and rough sets, Pattern Recognition33(9): 1487–1496.10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00129-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Bustince, H., Madrid, N. and Ojeda-Aciego, M. (2015). The notion of weak-contradiction: Definition and measures, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems23(4): 1057–1069.10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2337934]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornejo, M.E., Díaz-Moreno, J.C. and Medina, J. (2017a). Multi-adjoint relation equations: A decision support system for fuzzy logic, International Journal of Intelligent Systems32(8): 778–800.10.1002/int.21889]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornejo, M.E., Lobo, D. and Medina, J. (2018a). Syntax and semantics of multi-adjoint normal logic programming, Fuzzy Sets and Systems345: 41–62, DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2017.12.009.10.1016/j.fss.2017.12.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornejo, M.E., Medina, J. and Ramírez-Poussa, E. (2017b). Attribute and size reduction mechanisms in multi-adjoint concept lattices, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics318: 388–402.10.1016/j.cam.2016.07.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornejo, M.E., Medina, J. and Ramírez-Poussa, E. (2018b). Characterizing reducts in multi-adjoint concept lattices, Information Sciences422: 364–376.10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.099]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornelis, C., Medina, J. and Verbiest, N. (2014). Multi-adjoint fuzzy rough sets: Definition, properties and attribute selection, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning55(1): 412–426.10.1016/j.ijar.2013.09.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Couso, I. and Dubois, D. (2011). Rough sets, coverings and incomplete information, Fundamenta Informaticae108(3–4): 223–247.10.3233/FI-2011-421]Search in Google Scholar
[Davey, B. and Priestley, H. (2002). Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd Edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511809088]Search in Google Scholar
[Denecke, K., Erné, M. and Wismath, S.L. (Eds) (2004). Galois Connections and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-1-4020-1898-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Nola, A., Sanchez, E., Pedrycz, W. and Sessa, S. (1989). Fuzzy Relation Equations and Their Applications to Knowledge Engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.10.1007/978-94-017-1650-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Díaz-Moreno, J.C. and Medina, J. (2013). Multi-adjoint relation equations: Definition, properties and solutions using concept lattices, Information Sciences253: 100–109.10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Díaz-Moreno, J.C., Medina, J. and Turunen, E. (2017). Minimal solutions of general fuzzy relation equations on linear carriers. An algebraic characterization, Fuzzy Sets and Systems311: 112–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ganter, B. and Wille, R. (1999). Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundation, Springer Verlag, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-59830-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Grant, J. and Hunter, A. (2006). Measuring inconsistency in knowledge bases, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems27(2): 159–184.10.1007/s10844-006-2974-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajek, P. (1998). Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-011-5300-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Han, S.-E. (2019). Roughness measures of locally finite covering rough sets, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning105: 368–385.10.1016/j.ijar.2018.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassanien, A.E., Abraham, A., Peters, J.F., Schaefer, G. and Henry, C. (2009). Rough sets and near sets in medical imaging: A review, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine13(6): 955–968.10.1109/TITB.2009.201701719304490]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassanien, A.E., Schaefer, G. and Darwish, A. (2010). Computational intelligence in speech and audio processing: Recent advances, in X.-Z. Gao et al. (Eds), Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 303–311.10.1007/978-3-642-11282-9_32]Search in Google Scholar
[Järvinen, J., Radeleczki, S. and Veres, L. (2009). Rough sets determined by quasiorders, Order26(4): 337–355.10.1007/s11083-009-9130-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Kortelainen, J. (1994). On relationship between modified sets, topological spaces and rough sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems61(1): 91–95.10.1016/0165-0114(94)90288-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Luo, C., Li, T., Chen, H., Fujita, H. and Yi, Z. (2018). Incremental rough set approach for hierarchical multicriteria classification, Information Sciences429: 72–87.10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Madrid, N. (2017). An extension of f-transforms to more general data: Potential applications, Soft Computing21(13): 3551–3565.10.1007/s00500-017-2622-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Madrid, N. and Ojeda-Aciego, M. (2011a). Measuring inconsistency in fuzzy answer set semantics, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems19(4): 605–622.10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2114669]Search in Google Scholar
[Madrid, N. and Ojeda-Aciego, M. (2011b). On the existence and unicity of stable models in normal residuated logic programs, International Journal of Computer Mathematics89(3): 310–324.10.1080/00207160.2011.580842]Search in Google Scholar
[Madrid, N. and Ojeda-Aciego, M. (2017). A view of f-indexes of inclusion under different axiomatic definitions of fuzzy inclusion, in S. Moral et al. (Eds), Scalable Uncertainty Management, Springer, Cham, pp. 307–318.10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_22]Search in Google Scholar
[Madrid, N., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Medina, J. and Perfilieva, I. (2019). L-fuzzy relational mathematical morphology based on adjoint triples, Information Sciences474: 75–89.10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.028]Search in Google Scholar
[Medina, J. (2012a). Multi-adjoint property-oriented and object-oriented concept lattices, Information Sciences190: 95–106.10.1016/j.ins.2011.11.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Medina, J. (2012b). Relating attribute reduction in formal, object-oriented and property-oriented concept lattices, Computers & Mathematics with Applications64(6): 1992–2002.10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.087]Search in Google Scholar
[Medina, J. (2017). Minimal solutions of generalized fuzzy relational equations: Clarifications and corrections towards a more flexible setting, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning84: 33–38.10.1016/j.ijar.2017.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M. and Ruiz-Calviño, J. (2009). Formal concept analysis via multi-adjoint concept lattices, Fuzzy Sets and Systems160(2): 130–144.10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M. and Vojtáš, P. (2004). Similarity-based unification: A multi-adjoint approach, Fuzzy Sets and Systems146(1): 43–62.10.1016/j.fss.2003.11.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Novák, V., Mockor, J. and Perfilieva, I. (1999). Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer, Boston, MA.10.1007/978-1-4615-5217-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Pagliani, P. (2014). The relational construction of conceptual patterns—Tools, implementation and theory, in M. Kryszkiewicz et al. (Eds), Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 14–27.10.1007/978-3-319-08729-0_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Pagliani, P. (2016). Covering Rough Sets and Formal Topology—A Uniform Approach Through Intensional and Extensional Constructors, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 109–145.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pagliani, P. and Chakraborty, M. (2008). A Geometry of Approximation: Rough Set Theory Logic, Algebra and Topology of Conceptual Patterns (Trends in Logic), 1st Edn, Springer Publishing Company, Berlin/Heidelberg.10.1007/978-1-4020-8622-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets, International Journal of Computer and Information Science11: 341–356.10.1007/BF01001956]Search in Google Scholar
[Pawlak, Z. (1991). Rough Sets—Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Perfilieva, I. (2006). Fuzzy transforms: Theory and applications, Fuzzy Sets and Systems157(8): 993–1023.10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Perfilieva, I., Singh, A.P. and Tiwari, S.P. (2017). On the relationship among f-transform, fuzzy rough set and fuzzy topology, Soft Computing21(13): 3513–3523.10.1007/s00500-017-2559-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ronse, C. and Heijmans, H.J.A.M. (1991). The algebraic basis of mathematical morphology. II: Openings and closings, CVGIP: Image Understanding54(1): 74–97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanchez, E. (1976). Resolution of composite fuzzy relation equations, Information and Control30(1): 38–48.10.1016/S0019-9958(76)90446-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Shao, M.-W., Liu, M. and Zhang, W.-X. (2007). Set approximations in fuzzy formal concept analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems158(23): 2627–2640.10.1016/j.fss.2007.05.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Skowron, A., Swiniarski, R. and Synak, P. (2004). Approximation spaces and information granulation, in S. Tsumoto et al. (Eds), Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 116–126.10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_13]Search in Google Scholar
[Slowinski, R. and Vanderpooten, D. (1997). Similarity relation as a basis for rough approximations, in P.P.Wang (Ed.), Advances in Machine Intelligence and Soft Computing, Duke University, Durham, NC, pp. 17–33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stell, J.G. (2007). Relations in mathematical morphology with applications to graphs and rough sets, in S. Winter et al. (Eds), Spatial Information Theory, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 438–454.10.1007/978-3-540-74788-8_27]Search in Google Scholar
[Tan, A., Wu, W.-Z. and Tao, Y. (2018). A unified framework for characterizing rough sets with evidence theory in various approximation spaces, Information Sciences454–455: 144–160.10.1016/j.ins.2018.04.073]Search in Google Scholar
[Varma, P.R.K., Kumari, V.V. and Kumar, S.S. (2015). A novel rough set attribute reduction based on ant colony optimisation, International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications14(3–4): 330–353.10.1504/IJISTA.2015.074333]Search in Google Scholar
[Wille, R. (1982). Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts, in I. Rival (Ed.), Ordered Sets, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 445–470.10.1007/978-94-009-7798-3_15]Search in Google Scholar
[Wille, R. (2005). Formal concept analysis as mathematical theory of concepts and concept hierarchies, in B. Ganter et al. (Eds), Formal Concept Analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3626, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 1–33.10.1007/11528784_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Zakowski, W. (1983). Approximations in the space (u, π), Demonstratio Mathematica16(3): 761–769.10.1515/dema-1983-0319]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, X., Li, T., Fujita, H., Liu, D. and Yao, Y. (2017). A unified model of sequential three-way decisions and multilevel incremental processing, Knowledge-Based Systems134: 172–188.10.1016/j.knosys.2017.07.031]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y. (1998a). A comparative study of fuzzy sets and rough sets, Information Sciences109(1): 227–242.10.1016/S0020-0255(98)10023-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y. (1998b). Relational interpretations of neighborhood operators and rough set approximation operators, Information Sciences111(1): 239–259.10.1016/S0020-0255(98)10006-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y. (2018). Three-way decision and granular computing, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning103: 107–123.10.1016/j.ijar.2018.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y. and Chen, Y. (2006). Rough set approximations in formal concept analysis, in J.F. Peters and A. Skowron (Eds), Transactions on Rough Sets V, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 285–305.10.1007/11847465_14]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y. and Lingras, P. (1998). Interpretations of belief functions in the theory of rough sets, Information Sciences104(1): 81–106.10.1016/S0020-0255(97)00076-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y.Y. (1996). Two views of the theory of rough sets in finite universes, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning15(4): 291–317.10.1016/S0888-613X(96)00071-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y.Y. (2004). A comparative study of formal concept analysis and rough set theory in data analysis, in S. Tsumoto et al. (Eds), Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 59–68.10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, Y. and Yao, B. (2012). Covering based rough set approximations, Information Sciences200: 91–107.10.1016/j.ins.2012.02.065]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Q., Xie, Q. and Wang, G. (2016). A survey on rough set theory and its applications, CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology1(4): 323–333.10.1016/j.trit.2016.11.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhu, W. (2007). Generalized rough sets based on relations, Information Sciences177(22): 4997–5011.10.1016/j.ins.2007.05.037]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziarko,W. (2008). Probabilistic approach to rough sets, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning49(2): 272–284.10.1016/j.ijar.2007.06.014]Search in Google Scholar