This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP & Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ global health, 6(6), e005671, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671BetranAPYeJMollerABSouzaJP&ZhangJ.Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimatesBMJ global health,66e0056712021https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671Search in Google Scholar
Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155): 1349-1357. https://doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5SandallJTribeRMAveryLMolaGVisserGHHomerCSet alShort-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and childrenLancet20183921015513491357https://doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5Search in Google Scholar
Linton A, Peterson MR, Williams TV. Effects of maternal characteristics on caesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002. Birth. 2004;1:3-11. https://doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0268LintonAPetersonMRWilliamsTVEffects of maternal characteristics on caesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002Birth20041311https://doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0268Search in Google Scholar
Ionescu CA, Dimitriu M, Poenaru E, Bănacu M, Furău GO, Navolan D & Ples L. Defensive caesarean section: A reality and a recommended health care improvement for Romanian obstetrics. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2019;25(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13025IonescuCADimitriuMPoenaruEBănacuMFurăuGONavolanD&PlesL.Defensive caesarean section: A reality and a recommended health care improvement for Romanian obstetricsJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2019251111116https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13025Search in Google Scholar
Yang YT, Mello MM, Subramanian SV & Studdert DM. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of caesarean section and vaginal birth after caesarean section. Medical care. 2009;47(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818475deYangYTMelloMMSubramanianSV&StuddertDM.Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of caesarean section and vaginal birth after caesarean sectionMedical care2009472234242https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818475deSearch in Google Scholar
Cavallaro FL, Cresswell JA & Ronsmans C. Obstetricians’ Opinions of the Optimal Caesarean Rate: A Global Survey. PloS one. 2016;11(3), e0152779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152779CavallaroFLCresswellJA&RonsmansC.Obstetricians’ Opinions of the Optimal Caesarean Rate: A Global SurveyPloS one2016113e0152779https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152779Search in Google Scholar
Antoniou E, Orovou E, Iliadou M, Sarella A, Palaska E, Sarantaki A, et al. Factors Associated with the Type of Caesarean Section in Greece and Their Correlation with International Guidelines. Acta informatica medica: AIM: journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina: casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH. 2021;29(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2021.29.38-44AntoniouEOrovouEIliadouMSarellaAPalaskaESarantakiAet alFactors Associated with the Type of Caesarean Section in Greece and Their Correlation with International GuidelinesActa informatica medica: AIM: journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina: casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH20212913844https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2021.29.38-44Search in Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations: Non-clinical Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Caesarean Sections. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGOWorld Health OrganizationWHO Recommendations: Non-clinical Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Caesarean SectionsGenevaWorld Health Organization2018Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGOSearch in Google Scholar
Haines H, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF & Hildingsson I. Womens’ attitudes and beliefs of childbirth and association with birth preference: a comparison of a Swedish and an Australian sample in mid-pregnancy. Midwifery. 2012;28(6), e850–e856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.011HainesHRubertssonCPallantJF&HildingssonI.Womens’ attitudes and beliefs of childbirth and association with birth preference: a comparison of a Swedish and an Australian sample in mid-pregnancyMidwifery2012286e850e856https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.011Search in Google Scholar
Salomonsson B, Gullberg MT, Alehagen S & Wijma K. Self-efficacy beliefs and fear of childbirth in nulliparous women. Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology. 2013;34(3), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2013.824418SalomonssonBGullbergMTAlehagenS&WijmaK.Self-efficacy beliefs and fear of childbirth in nulliparous womenJournal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology2013343116121https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2013.824418Search in Google Scholar
Wiklund I, Edman G & Andolf E. Caesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2007;86(4), 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340701217913WiklundIEdmanG&AndolfE.Caesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothersActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica,2007864451456https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340701217913Search in Google Scholar
Hall WA, Stoll K, Hutton EK & Brown H. A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2012;12, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-78HallWAStollKHuttonEK&BrownH.A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian womenBMC pregnancy and childbirth,20121278https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-78Search in Google Scholar
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020;2(4). https://doi:org/10.1002/hbe2.195AjzenIThe theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questionsHum. Behav. Emerg. Technol202024https://doi:org/10.1002/hbe2.195Search in Google Scholar
Varnakioti D, Gourounti K, Sarantaki A, Tzavara C, Lykeridou A. The development and the psychometric evaluation of the Adolescents Intentions towards the Birth Options Scale in Greek. European Journal of Midwifery. 2020;6 (March), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/145968VarnakiotiDGourountiKSarantakiATzavaraCLykeridouAThe development and the psychometric evaluation of the Adolescents Intentions towards the Birth Options Scale in GreekEuropean Journal of Midwifery20206March19https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/145968Search in Google Scholar
McKay A, & Holowaty P. Sexual health education: a study of adolescents’ opinions, self-perceived needs, and current and preferred sources of information. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 1997;6(1), 29-38.McKayA&HolowatyP.Sexual health education: a study of adolescents’ opinions, self-perceived needs, and current and preferred sources of informationThe Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality1997612938Search in Google Scholar
McKay A. Sexual health education in the schools: Questions and answers. The Canadian journal of human sexuality. 2004;13(3):129-141McKayA.Sexual health education in the schools: Questions and answersThe Canadian journal of human sexuality2004133129141Search in Google Scholar
Stoll K, Fairbrother N, Carty E, Jordan N, Miceli C, Vostrcil Y & Willihnganz L. “It’s all the rage these days”: University students’ attitudes toward vaginal and caesarean birth. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.). 2009;36(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00310.xStollKFairbrotherNCartyEJordanNMiceliCVostrcilY&WillihnganzL.“It’s all the rage these days”: University students’ attitudes toward vaginal and caesarean birthBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2009362133140https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00310.xSearch in Google Scholar
Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Hearps S, Tomkinson J, Baradaran N, Hall WA, et al. (2011). Birth technology and maternal roles in birth: knowledge and attitudes of canadian women approaching childbirth for the first time. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC. 2009;33(6), 598–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34908-8KleinMCKaczorowskiJHearpsSTomkinsonJBaradaranNHallWAet al2011Birth technology and maternal roles in birth: knowledge and attitudes of canadian women approaching childbirth for the first timeJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada: JOGC2009336598608https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34908-8Search in Google Scholar
Handan O, Gulay R. University students’ attitudes toward natural birth. J. Gynecol. Womens Health. 2017;7(4). https://doi:10.19080/JGWH.2017.07.555717HandanOGulayRUniversity students’ attitudes toward natural birthJ. Gynecol. Womens Health201774https://doi:10.19080/JGWH.2017.07.555717Search in Google Scholar
Antić LZ, Radoš SN, Jokić-Begić N. Are non-pregnant women afraid of childbirth? Prevalence and predictors of fear of childbirth in students. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019;40(3):226231. https://doi:10.1080/0167482X.2018.1470162AntićLZRadošSNJokić-BegićNAre non-pregnant women afraid of childbirth? Prevalence and predictors of fear of childbirth in studentsJ. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol2019403226231https://doi:10.1080/0167482X.2018.1470162Search in Google Scholar
Stoll KH, Downe S, Edmonds J, Gross MM, Malott A, McAra-Couper J et al. A Survey of University Students’ Preferences for Midwifery Care and Community Birth Options in 8 High-Income Countries. Journal of midwifery & women’s health. 2020;65(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13069StollKHDowneSEdmondsJGrossMMMalottAMcAra-CouperJet alA Survey of University Students’ Preferences for Midwifery Care and Community Birth Options in 8 High-Income CountriesJournal of midwifery & women’s health2020651131141https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13069Search in Google Scholar
Thomson G, Stoll K, Downe S & Hall WA. Negative impressions of childbirth in a North-West England student population. Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology. 2017;38(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1216960ThomsonGStollKDowneS&HallWA.Negative impressions of childbirth in a North-West England student populationJournal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology20173813744https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1216960Search in Google Scholar
Tilden EL, Caughey AB, Lee CS & Emeis C. The Effect of Childbirth Self-Efficacy on Perinatal Outcomes. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing: JOGNN. 2016;45(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.06.003TildenELCaugheyABLeeCS&EmeisC.The Effect of Childbirth Self-Efficacy on Perinatal OutcomesJournal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing: JOGNN2016454465480https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.06.003Search in Google Scholar
Kingdon C, Downe S, Betran AP. Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies. PLoS One. 2018;13(9): e0203274. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203274https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A30023891/AONE?u=anon~86867a4b&sid=googleScholar&xid=aa0cda7cKingdonCDowneSBetranAPNon-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studiesPLoS One2018139e0203274https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203274https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A30023891/AONE?u=anon~86867a4b&sid=googleScholar&xid=aa0cda7cSearch in Google Scholar