[
1. AJP-5 – Allied Joint Doctrine for the Planning of Operations, 2019. https://www.coemed.org/files/stanags/01_AJP/AJP-5_EDA_V2_E_2526.pdf, 25. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Angstrom, J., in Widen, J. J., 2015. Contemporary Military Theory: The Dynamics of War. London; New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Axe, D., 2022. The Russian Army Is Running Out Of Trucks For Its War In Ukraine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2022/03/18/as-predicted-the-russian-army-is-running-out-of-trucks-for-its-war-in-ukraine/?sh=5d8be8c2577c, 24. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Barfoed, J., 2018. A COG Concept for Winning More Than Just Battles. Joint Force Quarterly. Issue 88, str. 116–123. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Publications/Article/1413045/a-cog-concept-for-winning-more-than-just-battles/, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. BBC, 2022. How hard will it be to defend Ukraine from Russian invasion? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60492860, 11. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Booth, A., Sutton, A., Papaioannou, D., 2016. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Božič, D., 2022. Gostovanje v oddaji Odmevi 10. 3. 2022. https://www.rtvslo.si/rtv365/arhiv/174855251?s=tv, 21. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Clark, M., Barros, G., in Stepanenko, K., 2022. Russia-Ukraine Warning Update: Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment [poročila za 24., 25., 26., 27. in 28. februar ter 2., 3., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., 16., 17. in 18. marec]. https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/ukraine-conflict-updates, 20. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Clausewitz, C., 1832. Vom Kriege [e-izdaja]. https://www.clausewitz.com/readings/VomKriege1832/_VKwholetext.htm, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Clausewitz, C., 2004. O vojni. Ljubljana: Studia humanitatis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. COPD – Allied Command Operations Comprehensive Operations Planning Directive COPD Interim v 2.0, 2013. https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/events/2016/sfpdpe/copd_v20.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Echevarria II, A. J., 2002. Clausewitz’s Center of Gravity: Changing Our Warfighting Doctrine--Again! Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute. https://www.clausewitz.com/readings/Echevarria/gravity.pdf, 28. 6. 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Echevarria II, A. J., 2004. Center of Gravity: Recommendations for Joint Doctrine. Joint Force Quarterly. Issue 35, str. 10–17. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a520978.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Echevarria II, A. J., 2012. Clausewitz’s Center of Gravity Legacy. Infinity Journal. Special Edition, str. 4–7. https://www.infinityjournal.com/article/45/Clausewitzs_Center_of_Gravity_Legacy/, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Eikmeier, D. C., 2004. Center of Gravity Analysis. Military Review. 84-4, str. 2–5. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/87ac/bf7de2fa3c8f63f462bc4 a9da4b104afd01e.pdf, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Eikmeier, D. C., 2007. A Logical Method for Center-of-Gravity Analysis. Military Review. 87-5, str. 62–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Eikmeier, D. C., 2012. Modernizing the Center of Gravity Concept – So It Works. C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 133–168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Eikmeier, D. C., 2015. Operational Art, Design and the Center of Gravity, Pt. 4 of 4 [video predavanje]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RYbtyzfB1w, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Evans, M., 2012. Centre of Gravity Analysis in Joint Military Planning and Design: Implications and Recommendations for the Australian Defence Force. Security Challenges. 8-2, str. 81–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26468953, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Fiore, N., 2017. Defeating the Battalion Tactical Group. Armor. 128-2, str. 917. https://www.benning.army.mil/Armor/eARMOR/content/issues/2017/Spring/ARMOR%20Spring%202017%20edition.pdf, 23. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Fox, A., in Kopsch, T., 2017. Moving Beyond Mechanical Metaphors: Debunking the Applicability of Centers of Gravity in 21st Century Warfare. https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2017/6/2/moving-beyond-mechanical-metaphors-debunking-the-applicability-of-centers-of-gravity-in-21st-century-warfare, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Freedman, L., 2014. Stop looking for the Center of Gravity. https://warontherocks.com/2014/06/stop-looking-for-the-center-of-gravity/, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Friedman, G., 2022. Evaluating Russia’s Performance in Ukraine. https://geopoliticalfutures.com/evaluating-russias-performance-in-ukraine/, 23. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. FM 100-5 Tentative Field Service Regulations Operations, 1939. https://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p4013coll9/id/975/, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. FM 100-5 Operations, 1986. http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm/ref/collection/p4013coll9/id/893, 27. 6. 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Furlan, B., 2021. Vojaška strategija: teorija in praksa strategije. Ljubljana: Center vojaških šol.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Gibney, E., 2022. Where is Russia’s cyberwar? Researchers decipher its strategy? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00753-9, 20. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Holloway, D., 2022. Read the fine print: Russia’s nuclear weapon use policy. https://thebulletin.org/2022/03/read-the-fine-print-russias-nuclear-weapon-use-policy/, 15. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Holmes, Jr., F. S., 1972. The Schlieffen Plan: Case History of the Relation of Military Strategy to National Security Policy. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0760506, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Independent, 2022. Denied easy victory, Russia presses reduced goals in Ukraine. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/russia-ap-vladimir-putin-michael-clarke-royal-united-services-institute-b2039476.html, 22. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Interfax, 2022. Na territorii DNR zamečeny kolonny bronetehniki. https://www.interfax.ru/world/823559, 13. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Isserson, G. S., 2013. The evolution of operational art. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Jones, S. G., in Wasielewski, P. G., 2022. Russia’s Possible Invasion of Ukraine. https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-possible-invasion-ukraine, 12. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. JP 5-0 Joint Planning, 2020. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp5_0.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Kagan, F. W., Bugayova, N., Barros, G., Stepanenko, K., Clark, M., 2021. Putin’s Likely Course of Action in Ukraine. https://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Ukraine%20Invasion%20Forecast%20Series%20Part%202%20ISW%20CT%20December%202021.pdf, 12. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Kagan, F. W., Barros, G., Stepanenko, K., 2022. Russia-Ukraine Warning Update: Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment [poročila za 1., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8. in 19. marec]. https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-march-1, 16. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Kaufman, E., 2022. US defense official: Ukrainian forces have „effectively struck“ Russian logistics and sustainment capabilities. https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-news/ukraine-russia-putin-news-03-14-22/h_0fbddb9157f8805297268c5c4587dcf9, 27. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 2021. Socio-political moods of the population of Ukraine: the results of a survey conducted on October 25-29, 2021 by the method of personal (»face-to-face«) interviews. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1069&page=1, 12. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 2022. Socio-political moods of the population of Ukraine: perception of the threat of military invasion by Russia and the case against P. Poroshenko according to data of a telephone survey conducted on January 20-21, 2022. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1091&page=1, 12. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Mattelaer, A., 2009. The Crisis in Operational Art. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Security/1109esdf_mattelaer.pdf, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Mavropoulos, P., 2017. Can the Clausewitzian paradoxical trinity help us understand better the center of gravity concept? http://www.warandstrategy.gr/2-uncategorised/63-the-clausewitzian-concepts-of-paradoxical-trinity-and-center-of-gravity-interdependence, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. McKinney, R., 2022. Vladimir Putin made ‚terrible mistake‘ invading Ukraine, University of Missouri prof says. https://eu.columbiatribune.com/story/news/education/campus/2022/03/04/vladimir-putin-russia-ukraine-war-unifies-nato-sanctions-oligarchs-missouri-professor/9345090002/, 23. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Melton, S. L., 2012. Center of Gravity Analysis—the Black Hole of Army Doctrine. C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 81–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Meyer, E. L., 2022. The centre of gravity concept: contemporary theories, comparison, and implications. Defence Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2030715, 25. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. MMC RTV, 2022. Doneck in Lugansk zaprosila Rusijo za pomoč pri spopadu z ukrajinsko vojsko. https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/s-in-j-amerika/doneck-in-lugansk-zaprosila-rusijo-zapomoc-pri-spopadu-z-ukrajinsko-vojsko/613403, 11. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. NATOTerm, 2020. https://nso.nato.int/natoterm/Web.mvc, 23. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Oryx, 2022. Attack On Europe: Documenting Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html, 24. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Palmgren, A., 2006. Centre of Gravity: Application and Utility of the Concept in the Modern Art of War. Tiede ja ase. Nro 64, str. 63–83. https://journal.fi/ta/article/view/47917/13791, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Paparone, C. R., in Davis, Jr., W. J., 2012. Exploring Outside the Tropics of Clausewitz: Our Slavish Anchoring to an Archaic Metaphor. C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 65–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Pravila za štabno delo, 2019. http://dk.mors.si/Dokument.php?id=1358&lang=slv, 2. 7. 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty, 2022. How Long Could Ukraine Hold Out Against A New Russian Invasion? https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-ukraine-invasion-scenarios/31614428.html, 11. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Reddit, 2022. https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/t7zdoe/it_appears_the_invading_russian_force_in_ukraine/?sort=new, 24. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Sandford, A., in Brezar, A., 2022. Ukraine war: UN overwhelmingly condemns invasion as Russia and Ukraine dispute who controls Kherson. https://www.euronews.com/2022/03/02/ukraine-war-biden-vows-putin-will-pay-a-price-as-russia-targets-urban-areas, 24. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. SCM Globe, 2022. Russian Logistics for the Invasion of Ukraine. https://www.scmglobe.com/russian-logistics-for-the-invasion-of-ukraine/, 26. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Stewart, P., in Ali, I., 2022. 80 % of Russia‘s forces around Ukraine in attack positions, U.S. official says. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/80-russias-forces-around-ukraine-attack-positions-us-official-says-2022-02-23/, 18. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Schneider, J. J., in Izzo, L. J., 1987. Clausewitz’s Elusive Center of Gravity. Parameters. 17-september, str. 46–57. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9383/fd2a8abd0d614b3a52dd1038a1f7db86fb77.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Strange, J., 1996. Centers of Gravity & Critical Vulnerabilities: Building on the Clausewitzian Foundation So That We Can All Speak the Same Language. Quantico: Marine Corps University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Strange, J., 2005. Centers of Gravity & Critical Vulnerabilities: Building on the Clausewitzian Foundation So That We Can All Speak the Same Language. Quantico: Marine Corps University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Strange, J., in Iron, R., b. d. Understanding Centers of Gravity and Critical Vulnerabilities: Part 2. https://theforge.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/adfwtc04_centres_of_gravity_and_critical_vulnerabilities_by_strange_and_iron.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Summers, H. G., 1981. On Strategy: The Vietnam War in Context. Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. TASS, 2022. Decision taken on denazification, demilitarization of Ukraine — Putin. https://tass.com/politics/1409189, 11. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2022. The Military Balance 2022. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tmib20/122/1?nav=tocList, 14. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Truppenführung, 1936. Berlin: Verlag E.S. Mittler & Sohn.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. UK Ministry of Defence, 2022. Intelligence Update (24. marec 2022). https://tinyurl.com/34ps4k3z, 27. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Ukrzaliznytsia, 2022. Aktual’na informacija ščodo zaliznyčnoho spolučennja ta funkcionuvannja vokzaliv. https://www.facebook.com/Ukrzaliznytsia/photos/a.1090644594302661/5298386753528403/, 23. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Vandersteen, K. P., 2012. Center of Gravity: A Quest for Certainty or Tilting at Windmills? C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 33–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Vego, M., 2000. Center of Gravity. Military Review. 80-2, str. 23–29. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-51912017/center-of-gravity, 28. 6. 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Vego, M., 2007. Clausewitz’s Schwerpunkt: Mistranslated from German – Misunderstood in English. Military Review. 87-1, str. 101–109. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-51912017/center-of-gravity, 28. 6. 2019. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20070228_art014.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Vego, M., 2009. Joint Operational Warfare: Theory and Practice. Newport: Naval War College.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. Vego, M., 2017. Operational Warfare at Sea: Theory and Practice. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. Vershinin, A., 2021. Feeding the Bear: A Closer Look at Russian Army Logistics and the Fait Accompli. https://warontherocks.com/2021/11/feeding-the-bear-a-closer-look-at-russian-army-logistics/, 15. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. Vremennyj Polevoj Ustav RKKA (PU-36), 1936. http://modelfan.ru/17966-vremennyypolevoy-ustav-rkka-pu-36.html, 9. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
73. Wall, M., 2022. 40-mile-long Russian invasion convoy visible from space in new 3D satellite view (video). https://www.space.com/russia-ukraine-invasion-convoy-3d-satellite-video, 24. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
74. War on the Rocks, 2022. In the Fourth Week, is Russia Revising its War Aims Amidst Attrition? https://warontherocks.com/2022/03/in-the-fourth-week-is-russia-revising-itswar-aims-amidst-attrition/, 22. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
75. Warden III, J. A., 1992. Employing Air Power in the Twenty-first Century. R. H. Shultz, Jr. in R. L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr., ur. The Future of Air Power in the Aftermath of the Gulf War. Maxwell Air Force Base: Air University Press, str. 57–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
76. Warden III, J. A., 1994. Air Theory for the Twenty-first Century. K. P. Magyar, ur. Challenge and Response: Anticipating US Military Security Concerns. Maxwell Air Force Base: Air University Press, str. 351–376.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
77. Warden III, J. A., 1995. The Enemy as a System. Airpower Journal. IX-1, str. 40–55. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/ASPJ/journals/Volume-09_Issue-1-Se/1995_Vol9_No1.pdf, 28. 6. 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
78. Yin, R. K., 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
79. Zweibelson, B., 2015. Gravity-free Decision-making: Avoiding Clausewitz’s Strategic Pull. Canberra: Directorate of Future Land Warfare. https://researchcentre.army.gov.au/sites/default/files/160427_msp_arp_zweibelson_web_final_b5.pdf, 7. 3. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
