[Assefa, G., Frostell, B., 2007. Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies, Technology in Society, 29, 63-78.10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayan, M.B., 2013. Fuzzy TOPSIS application for supplier selection problem, International Journal of Information. Business and Management, 4(3), 11-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., 2005a. An integrated sustainability decision-support framework Part I: Problem structuring, The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12(2), 98-111.10.1080/13504500509469622]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., 2005b. An integrated sustainability decision-support framework Part II: Problem analysis, The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12(2), 112-131.10.1080/13504500509469623]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bakouros, Y., 2000. Technology evaluation, , available at: http://www.adi.pt/docs/innoregio_techn_evaluation.pdf, (20.09.2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertoni, M., Hallstedt, S., Ola, I., 2015. A model-based approach for sustainability and value assessment in the aerospace value chain, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7, 2015, 1-19.10.1177/1687814015590215]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 17(1), 233-247.10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Coates, J., 1976. Technology Assessment - A Tool Kit. Chemtech, p. 372.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chou, S-W., Chang, Y-C., 2008. The implementation factors that influence the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Benefits, Decision Support System, 46(1), 149-157.10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Daim, T., Yates, D., Peng, Y., Jimenez, B., 2009. Technology assessment for clean energy technologies: The case of the Pacific Northwest, Technology in Society, 31, 232-243.10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Davies, M.A.P., 1994. A Multicriteria Decision Model Application for Managing Group Decisions, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(1), 47-58.10.1057/jors.1994.6]Search in Google Scholar
[Dąbrowski, K, Skrzypek, K., 2016. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to building research teams, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 1(21), 7-11.10.2478/mspe-01-01-2016]Search in Google Scholar
[Ely A., Zwanenberg, Stirling, A., 2011. Technology Assessment New Models of Technology Assessment for Development, available at: http://www.academia.edu/21400513/Technology_Assessment_New_Models_of_Technology_Assessment_for_Development (10.03.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, A., Strezov V., Evans T.J., 2009. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1082-1088.10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Garg, H., 2017. Some Picture Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Multicriteria Decision-Making, Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering, 42, 5275-5290.10.1007/s13369-017-2625-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Gładysz, B., Kluczek, A., 2017. A framework for strategic assessment of far-reaching technologies: A case study of Combined Heat and Power technology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 242-252.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.175]Search in Google Scholar
[González, P del Río, 2005. Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: a study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry, Business strategy and the environment, 14(1), 20-37.10.1002/bse.426]Search in Google Scholar
[Grundwald, A., Rösch, C., 2011. Sustainability assessment of energy technologies: towards an integrative framework, Energy, Sustainability and Society 1, 2011, 3. doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-1-3.10.1186/2192-0567-1-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harris, J.M., Wise T., Goodwin N.R., 2001. A survey of sustainable development: social and economic dimensions, frontier issues in economic thought, Island Press,. Washington, DC, 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hrovatin, N., Dolšak, N., Zorić, J., 2016. Factors impacting investments in energy efficiency and clean technologies: empirical evidence from Slovenian manufacturing firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 475-486.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.039]Search in Google Scholar
[IEA, 2006. Energy Technology Perspectives, OECD/IEA, Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jang, J.-S.R, 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665 – 685.10.1109/21.256541]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Karschin, I., Geldermann, J, 2015. Efficient cogeneration and district heating systems in bioenergy villages: an optimization approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 305-314.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.086]Search in Google Scholar
[Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.10.1017/CBO9781139174084]Search in Google Scholar
[Klevas, V., Streimikienea D., Kleviene, A., 2009. Sustainability assessment of the energy projects implementation in regional scale, Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(1), 155-166.10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kluczek, A., 2016. Application of multi-criteria approach for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes, Management and Production Engineering Review, 7, 62-78.10.1515/mper-2016-0026]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kluczek, A., Gładysz, B., 2015. Analytical Hierarchy Process/Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution-based approach to the generation of environmental improvement options, Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 360-367.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.079]Search in Google Scholar
[Kong, L., Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L., 2016. Assessment of emerging energy-efficiency technologies for the pulp and paper industry: A technical review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 5-28.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.116]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, P., 2009. Multi-attribute decision making method research based on interval vague set and TOPSIS method, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 15(3), 453-463.10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.453-463]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Meixner, O., 2013. Fuzzy AHP Group Decision Analysis and its Application for the Evaluation of Energy Sources, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 896-905.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oteng-Seifah, S.A.E., Adjei-Kumi T.A., 2007. Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Methodologies. In: Horner, M., Hardcastle, C., Price, A., Bebbington, J. (eds.), International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment Glasgow.]Search in Google Scholar
[Achs I., 1999. Social sustainability and whole development: exploring the dimensions of sustainable development. In: Egon, B, Thomas, J., (eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: a cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation, Zed Books, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schot, J.W., 1992. Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(1), 36-56.10.1177/016224399201700103]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Singh, R.K., Murty H.R., Gupta S.K., Dikshit A.K., 2012. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15, 281–299.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Singh, S., Olugu E.U., Fallahpour A., 2014. Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs. Clean Technology Environment Polic, 16, 847–860.10.1007/s10098-013-0676-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Varela, L.R., Ribeiro, R.A., 2003. Evaluation of simulated annealing to solve fuzzy optimization problems, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 14(2), 59–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar